| Literature DB >> 29240255 |
Kathrin Buchberger1, Martin Walenta1, Klaus Zangger1.
Abstract
The measurement of small homonuclear coupling constants is often prevented by either their small size and/or overlap with other signal splittings. Here, we present a real-time method to extract such couplings without interference from other splittings, with a resolution that is beyond conventional NMR spectra. In this real-time J-upscaled SERF experiment, homonuclear coupling is removed by slice-selective pure shift NMR, whereas scalar coupling to only one selected signal is reintroduced by selective refocusing. The remaining couplings are enhanced by real-time J-upscaling during interruptions of the FID data acquisition. The resulting spectrum is not only simplified by the restriction of the scalar coupling but also its resolution enhanced. This improved resolution results from a reduction of signal broadening due to magnetic field inhomogeneities from 2 different sources: slice-selective excitation and the spin-echo type J-upscaling element.Entities:
Keywords: NMR spectroscopy; homonuclear broadband decoupling; interrupted acquisition; real-time J-upscaling; scalar coupling; selective refocusing; spatially selective excitation; structure analysis
Year: 2018 PMID: 29240255 PMCID: PMC6175170 DOI: 10.1002/mrc.4699
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Magn Reson Chem ISSN: 0749-1581 Impact factor: 2.447
Figure 1Pulse‐sequence of the J‐upscaled real‐time SERF experiment. Selective pulses are represented by half‐ellipsoids. During the acquisition interruption, a combination of slice‐selective pure shift NMR (red pulses) is combined with selective refocusing (green pulse) and real‐time J‐upscaling (during 2τ). The total acquisition time is aq and the pulse phases are ϕ1 = ϕR = x,‐x,‐x,x,y,‐y,‐y,y; ϕ2 = x,‐x; ϕ3 = x,x,‐x,‐x; ϕ4 = ‐x,x. The relative gradient strengths are G2:G3:G4 = ‐1:1:2. The strength of G1, which is the gradient for slice‐selective excitation, depends on the spectral width. It is typically ~1–2 G/cm
Figure 2A conventional one‐dimensional 1H NMR spectrum of n‐propanol is shown in (a) and expanded in (b), together with a real‐time SERF spectrum of the H1 proton after selective refocusing of proton 2 in (c). A real‐time J‐upscaled SERF of the same proton with a scaling factor of six is shown in (d). From the apparent splitting of 39.2 and the scaling factor λ = 6, a coupling constants of 6.5 Hz is calculated. The signal at 3.43 ppm is from residual HDO (partly deuterated water). Eighty milligrams of propanol were dissolved in 500 μl DMSO‐d6. Thirty‐two scans were acquired for each of the spectra. The FID chunking time was 27 ms. A 40 ms E‐BURP pulse was used for excitation and 7 ms 180° Gaussian pulses were used for both homonuclear decoupling and selective refocusing. A 1 ms CHIRP 180° pulse was used for nonselective inversion during the interruption
Figure 3A conventional one‐dimensional 1H NMR spectrum of 1‐ethynyl‐cyclohexene is shown in (a) and the H2 proton signal expanded in (b). This signal shows a complicated multiplet due to couplings to other protons in the cyclohexene moiety and rather broad lines. A threefold upscaled real‐time SERF spectrum is shown in (c) after selective refocusing of the side‐chain methine proton. From the apparent splitting of 1.8 Hz and the scaling factor λ = 3, a J value of 0.6 Hz is calculated for this five‐bond coupling. In the conventional spectrum, this splitting is not visible and only leads to relatively broad lines of the multiplet. Eighty milligrams of 1‐ethynyl‐cyclohexene were dissolved in 500 μl DMSO‐d6. Thirty‐two scans were acquired for each of the spectra. The FID chunking time was 27 ms. A 40 ms E‐BURP pulse was used for excitation and 7 ms 180° Gaussian pulses were used both for homonuclear decoupling and selective refocusing. A 1 ms CHIRP 180° pulse was used for nonselective inversion during the interruption