Shu Wang, Xiaoqun Liu, Tiankui Qiao, Qi Zhang1. 1. Department of Oncology, Jinshan Hospital, Medical Centre of Fudan University, Jinshan District, Shanghai, China.
Abstract
Objective To evaluate the radiosensitivity effect of CpG oligodeoxyribonucleotide (ODN) 7909 on human epidermoid cancer strain-2 (Hep-2) cells in vitro and discuss the potential for improved radiotherapy treatment in patients with laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma. Methods Toll-like receptor ( TLR) 9 expression was assessed in Hep-2 cells using Western blots and reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction. Cell Counting Kit-8 was used to detect Hep-2 cell viability at 24 and 48 h following treatment with different CpG ODN7909 concentrations. Cellular colonization was evaluated using microscopy. Cell cycle distribution and apoptosis rate was determined with flow cytometry. Interleukin (IL)-12 and tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-α concentrations were detected by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Results Hep-2 cells were found to express TLR9, and CpG ODN7909 treatment suppressed Hep-2 cell viability in a dose- and time-dependent manner. Cell survival curve analyses revealed a sensitivity enhancement ratio of the mean death dose of 1.225 for CpG ODN7909 plus irradiation versus irradiation alone. Furthermore, the population of Gap 2/mitotic-phase cells, apoptosis rate and secreted IL-12 and TNF-α levels were significantly increased in Hep-2 cells treated with CpG ODN7909 plus irradiation versus IR alone. Conclusion CpG ODN7909 enhanced the radiosensitivity of Hep-2 cells in vitro.
Objective To evaluate the radiosensitivity effect of CpG oligodeoxyribonucleotide (ODN) 7909 on humanepidermoid cancer strain-2 (Hep-2) cells in vitro and discuss the potential for improved radiotherapy treatment in patients with laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma. Methods Toll-like receptor ( TLR) 9 expression was assessed in Hep-2 cells using Western blots and reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction. Cell Counting Kit-8 was used to detect Hep-2 cell viability at 24 and 48 h following treatment with different CpG ODN7909 concentrations. Cellular colonization was evaluated using microscopy. Cell cycle distribution and apoptosis rate was determined with flow cytometry. Interleukin (IL)-12 and tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-α concentrations were detected by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Results Hep-2 cells were found to express TLR9, and CpG ODN7909 treatment suppressed Hep-2 cell viability in a dose- and time-dependent manner. Cell survival curve analyses revealed a sensitivity enhancement ratio of the mean death dose of 1.225 for CpG ODN7909 plus irradiation versus irradiation alone. Furthermore, the population of Gap 2/mitotic-phase cells, apoptosis rate and secreted IL-12 and TNF-α levels were significantly increased in Hep-2 cells treated with CpG ODN7909 plus irradiation versus IR alone. Conclusion CpG ODN7909 enhanced the radiosensitivity of Hep-2 cells in vitro.
Laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma (LSCC), a highly aggressive malignancy with 5-year
overall survival of approximately 61%, is one of the most common malignant
otolaryngology tumours and ranks second among cancers derived from epithelial cells
in the head and neck.[1-3] Radiotherapy is
a clinically important treatment method for patients with LSCC, however, the mode of
LSCC treatment is changing and increasing numbers of clinicians focus on how to
preserve the function and original structure of the larynx. Recent years have seen a
trend toward improved post-treatment voice quality in patients with early-stage LSCC
treated with external radiation.[4-7]Radiotherapy is not only an adjuvant treatment following surgery, but also an
important treatment for patients with locally advanced LSCC who can’t undergo
surgical resection or who have a strong desire to protect the larynx.[8,9] Various studies have shown that
irradiation (IR) combined with conventional chemotherapeutic drugs, such as
cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (5-Fu), may achieve better results compared with IR
alone.[10-13] Nevertheless, there remains a
risk of recurrence and metastasis in some patients with LSCC, for whom the efficacy
of re-irradiation is poor and radiation resistance is prone to occur, resulting in
reduced quality of life and shorter life span.[14] Hence, there is an urgent need to explore an effective radiosensitizer in the
treatment of the patients with LSCC.Recent studies have indicated that synthetic oligodeoxyribonucleotides containing
unmethylated cytosine-phosphate-guanine motifs (CpG ODNs) may induce anti-tumour
responses as immunoadjuvants in combination with other therapies, via interacting
with toll-like receptors (TLRs) that play a fundamental role in the innate immune
system.[15-17] Moreover, a
previous study by the present authors suggested that TLR9,
recognized by CpG ODN7909, is also expressed in humannon-small cell lung cancer
(A549) cells, and CpG ODN7909 was shown to potentiate X-ray-induced inhibition of
proliferation in this cell line.[18] Nevertheless, the role of CpG ODN7909 on the radiosensitivity of humanepidermoid cancer strain 2 (Hep-2) cells, a humanlaryngeal carcinoma-derived cell
line, remains unclear.In the present study, TLR9 expression, and the role of CpG ODN7909
on Hep-2 cell radiosensitivity, was assessed. The effects of CpG ODN7909 on cytokine
secretion, cellular proliferation, cell cycle distribution and apoptosis was also
investigated in the Hep-2 cells.
Materials and methods
Cell culture and CpG ODN7909
Hep-2 cells purchased from the Chinese Type Culture Collection (CTCC; Wuhan,
China) were maintained in the following culture medium: Minimum essential medium
(MEM; BioWest, Loire Valley, France) supplemented with 10% foetal bovine serum
(FBS; Gibco, ThermoFisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), 100 U/ml penicillin G,
and 100 μg/ml streptomycin at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere of 95% air and 5%
CO2. CpG ODN7909 (5′-TCGTCGTTTTGTCGTTTTGTCGTT-3′) was obtained
from Shanghai Sangon Biological Engineering Technology and Services Limited
Company (Sangon, Shanghai, China), dissolved in phosphate buffer saline (PBS;
0.01 M, pH 7.4) and maintained at –20°C until use.
Western blotting
Whole cells were lysed in protein lysis buffer with 1 mM phenylmethylsulphonyl
fluoride. Total proteins were harvested by centrifugation (14 000
g for 15 min at 4°C), and protein concentrations were
determined by the Bradford Assay. Briefly, equal amounts of proteins (50 μg)
were separated by sodium dodecyl sulphate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and
transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane (EMD Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA).
Membranes were blocked with 2% bovine serum albumin (BSA) and then incubated
overnight at 4°C with monoclonal mouse anti-TLR9 antibody (1:1 000 dilution;
Cell Signalling Technology, Beverly, MA, USA) and glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate
dehydrogenase primary antibody (GAPDH;1:5 000 dilution; Cell Signalling
Technology, Beverly, MA, USA). After three washes with Tris-buffered saline
Tween-20 (TBS-T; pH 7.6; 20 mM Tris-HCl, 150 mM NaCl and 0.1 % Tween 20), the
membrane was incubated with horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated goat
anti-rabbit IgG (1:5 000 dilution; Kaiji, Jiangsu China) at room temperature for
1 h. The membrane was finally washed three times with TBS-T. TLR9 protein levels
were expressed as the optical density value of the target protein/GAPDH using a
G:BOX ChemiXR5 gel doc system with Gel-Pro32 software (Syngene, Cambridge,
UK).
Total RNA was extracted from 5 × 106 Hep-2 cells using TRIzol® Reagent
(Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA), then reverse transcribed to cDNA using a
PrimeScript™ RT Master Mix (TaKaRa, Dalian, China) according to the
manufacturers' instructions. The cDNA was then amplified using the following
TLR9 primer sequences: 5′-GCAAAGTGGGCG AGATGAGGAT-3′ (forward) and 5′-GA
GTGAGCGGAAG AAGATGC-3′ (reverse), with AccuPower® 2X Greenstar™ qPCR
Master Mix (Bioneer Corporation, Daejeon, South Korea). PCR was preformed using
the LightCycler® 480 system (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany)
with the following thermal-cycling conditions: 5 min at 95°C for
pre-denaturation, followed by 32 cycles of 30 s at 95°C for denaturation, 30 s
at 56°C for annealing, 45 s at 72°C for elongation, and a final extension at
72°C for 10 min. The 578 bp reaction product was resolved by electrophoresis
using a 1.5% agarose gel, stained with ethidium bromide, and photographed using
an ultraviolet transilluminator.
Radiation exposure
Hep-2 cells were exposed to 6 MV X-rays using a linear accelerator (Varian
Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA, USA) under the source-to-skin distance of 100
cm, with a dose rate of 2.0 Gy/min. Graded irradiated doses, ranging from 0 to
10 Gy, were used in Hep-2 clonogenic survival assays. For all other experiments,
10 Gy radiation was employed.
Detection of cell viability via cell counting kit-8 (CCK-8)
Each well of 96-well plates were seeded with 6 × 103 Hep-2 cells in
100 μl of culture medium. Various concentrations of CpG ODN7909 (0, 5, 10, 20,
40 and 60 μg/ml) were added, and the cells incubated for 24 or 48 h at 37°C.
Following CpG ODN7909 treatment, 10 μl of CCK-8 reagent (Dojindo Laboratories,
Kami Mashiki-gun, Japan) was added to each well, and the cells incubated for a
further 3 h at 37°C in the dark. Optical densities were then measured at 450 nm,
and cell viability of CpG-treated cells was calculated as a proportion of the
untreated cells, as follows: absorbance of CpG-treated cells/absorbance of
untreated cells (0 μg/ml CpG ODN7909) × 100. Hep-2 cells were then seeded as
before, and equally randomized into four groups, comprising: control group, CpG
ODN7909-treated group (CpG group), irradiation group (IR group), and CpG
ODN7909 + irradiation group (CpG + IR group). Based on the initial cell
viability results, Hep-2 cells in the CpG and CpG + IR groups were treated with
CpG ODN7909 at a final concentration of 10 μg/ml, and cells in all groups were
cultured for 24 h. Following 24 h culture at 37°C, cells in the IR and CpG + IR
groups were then exposed to 10 Gy radiation. A further 24 or 48 h following
irradiation, cell viability was determined in all cells using the CCK-8 assay.
All experiments were performed three times for each condition.
Clonogenic survival assay
Hep-2 cells were divided into two treatment groups and incubated for 24 h with or
without CpG ODN7909 at a final concentration of 10 μg/ml. Cells were then
irradiated with varying IR doses of 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10 Gy, and harvested
using 0.05% trypsin-EDTA solution for 1–2 min at 37°C. Cells were then re-seeded
into 60 mm dishes at 500–3 000 cells per dish, as previously described,[19] in triplicate. Following incubation for 14 days, colonies were stained
with crystal violet and fixed in methanol. The number of stained colonies (not
less than 50 cells) was imaged and counted manually under a microscope. The
clonogenic survival fraction (%) was calculated as follows: (irradiated cell
colony numbers/unirradiated cell colony numbers) × 100. The radiobiological
parameters (D0, N, Dq) were analysed with a single-hit
multi-target model. D0 is the radiation dose that can reduce survival
by a factor of 1/e in the exponential region of the curve, N is the
extrapolation number or zero-dose extrapolate, Dq is the
quasithreshold dose, Dq = D0 × ln N.[20]
Cell cycle and apoptosis analysed by flow cytometry
Hep-2 cells, growing in logarithmic phase in six-well plates, were divided into
four treatment groups (control group, CpG group, IR group, and CpG + IR group)
as above. After 24 and 48 h exposure to 10 Gy radiation (IR groups only), cells
of each group were harvested. The cell cycle distribution (proportion of cells
in Gap 2/Mitotic phase [G2/M]) was detected by measuring the DNA content stained
with propidium iodide (PI; BD Biosciences, San Jose, USA) in the presence of
RNase, according to the manufacturer's instructions. Briefly, at 24 or 48 h post
irradiation, Hep-2 cells were harvested using 0.05% trypsin-EDTA and centrifuged
at 233 g at room temperature for 5 min. The cells were then
fixed with 70% cold ethanol overnight at –20°C, then incubated with 500 μl of
staining solution (containing 200 μl of RNase/PI) at room temperature for 15 min
in the dark prior to flow cytometry. The proportion of apoptotic cells was
determined using an annexin V fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC) apoptosis
detection kit (BD Biosciences, San Jose, USA). Briefly, harvested cell pellets
were resuspended in 190 μl binding buffer and stained with 5 μl of annexin V
FITC and 5 μl of PI staining solution for 30 min at room temperature in the
dark. Cell cycle and apoptosis were evaluated by flow cytometry using a FACScan™
system with CellQuest™ software, version 3.3 (Becton Dickinson, Mountain View,
CA, USA), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The proportion of cells
in G2/M phase was calculated as: (number of cells in G2/M phase/total number of
cells) × 100. Apoptosis rate (%) was calculated as previously described:[21] (number of apoptotic cells/total number of cells) × 100.
Measurement of interleukin (IL)-12 and tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-α
release
Hep-2 cells divided into four treatment groups were cultured in six-well plates
and treated as above. At 24 or 48 h post-radiation, the cell culture
supernatants were collected and stored at –80°C. Human IL-12 Valukine™
enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kit and HumanTNF-alpha Valukine™
ELISA Kit (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA) were used to measure secreted
IL-12 and TNF-α levels, respectively.
Statistical analyses
GraphPad Prism software, version 5.0 (GraphPad Software, La Jolla, CA, USA) was
used for data analyses and graph production. All data are presented as mean ± SD
of at least three independent experiments. A single-hit multi-target model was
used to fit colony counts to a clonogenic survival curve. Differences in cell
viability, flow cytometric analyses or secreted cytokine levels between the
treatment groups were determined by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) using
Tukey’s honest significant difference (HSD) multiple comparisons test. The two
treatment groups in the clonogenic survival assay were analysed using Student’s
t-test. A P-value <0.05 was considered
statistically significant.
Results
Expression of TLR9 in Hep-2 cells
Western blots and RT-PCR results showed that TLR9 was expressed
in Hep-2 cells. The optical density value of TLR9/GAPDH was 0.55 (Figure 1a), and RT-PCR
revealed a product of 578 bp, which corresponded to the expected TLR9 fragment
size (Figure 1b).
Figure 1.
Expression of TLR9 in Hep-2 cells. (a) Representative
image showing positive Western blot signal for TLR9 protein, with GAPDH
as the loading control; and (b) Representative agarose gel image showing
the TLR9 DNA fragment (approximately 578 bp) amplified using
reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction. TLR9, toll-like
receptor 9; GAPDH, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase
Expression of TLR9 in Hep-2 cells. (a) Representative
image showing positive Western blot signal for TLR9 protein, with GAPDH
as the loading control; and (b) Representative agarose gel image showing
the TLR9 DNA fragment (approximately 578 bp) amplified using
reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction. TLR9, toll-like
receptor 9; GAPDH, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase
Cell viability
In Hep-2 cells treated with CpG ODN7909 at 0, 5, 10, 20, 40 and 60 μg/ml, cell
viability was shown to be inhibited in a dose-and time-dependent manner
(P <0.01), displayed by a gradually increasing
inhibitory effect with increasing CpG ODN7909 concentrations and lower cell
viability at the higher concentrations between 24 and 48 h (Figure 2a). In Hep-2 cells with or
without CpG ODN7909 treatment at 10 μg/ml, and with or without 10 Gy
irradiation, cell viability decreased progressively with a statistically
significant difference between the groups (F = 60.980,
P <0.01 at 24 h and F = 80.159,
P <0.01 at 48 h; Figure 2b). Compared with the control
group, cell viability in the IR group was significantly lower
(P <0.01 at both 24 and 48 h). Cell viability was also
significantly lower in the CpG + IR group compared with IR alone
(P <0.01 at both 24 and 48 h). There was no
statistically significant difference in cell viability between the control group
and Hep-2 cells treated with CpG ODN7909 alone (P = 0.205 at 24
h and P = 0.061 at 48 h; Figure 2b).
Figure 2.
Effects of CpG ODN7909 (CpG) and irradiation (IR) on cell viability of
Hep-2 cells quantified using cell counting kit-8 assays. (a) Cells were
treated with CpG ODN7909 at concentrations of 0, 5, 10, 20, 40 and
60µg/ml and CCK-8 was added at 24 and 48 h following treatment; and (b)
cell viability in different treatment groups (control, 10 µg/ml CpG
ODN7909 only, 10 Gy irradiation at only, or 10 µg/ml CpG ODN7909 with 10
Gy irradiation). Data presented as mean ± SD; ★P
<0.01, control group versus IR group; ♦P <0.01,
IR group versus CpG + IR group (one-way analysis of variance using
Tukey’s HSD multiple comparisons test); CpG ODN, unmethylated
cytosine-phosphate-guanine motif oligodeoxyribonucleotides
Effects of CpG ODN7909 (CpG) and irradiation (IR) on cell viability of
Hep-2 cells quantified using cell counting kit-8 assays. (a) Cells were
treated with CpG ODN7909 at concentrations of 0, 5, 10, 20, 40 and
60µg/ml and CCK-8 was added at 24 and 48 h following treatment; and (b)
cell viability in different treatment groups (control, 10 µg/ml CpG
ODN7909 only, 10 Gy irradiation at only, or 10 µg/ml CpG ODN7909 with 10
Gy irradiation). Data presented as mean ± SD; ★P
<0.01, control group versus IR group; ♦P <0.01,
IR group versus CpG + IR group (one-way analysis of variance using
Tukey’s HSD multiple comparisons test); CpG ODN, unmethylated
cytosine-phosphate-guanine motif oligodeoxyribonucleotides
Clonogenic survival analysis
Hep-2 cell dose-survival curves were fitted using a single-hit multi-target model
(Figure 3). In Hep-2
cells treated with CpG ODN7909 plus IR, there were markedly lower values
(P <0.05) for mean death dose (D0), quasi
field dose (Dq), extrapolation number (N) and a narrower initial
shoulder than in cells treated with IR alone, and the sensitivity enhancement
ratio (SER)D0 was 1.225. These results suggest that CpG ODN7909 has
radiation-enhancing effects in Hep-2 cells (Figure 3 and Table 1).
Figure 3.
Dose-survival curves fitted using a multi-target single-hitting model to
demonstrate the impact of CpG ODN 7909 on irradiation (IR) of Hep-2
cells. Hep-2 cells were irradiated with 6 MV X-rays at 0, 2, 4, 6, 8,
and 10 Gy with or without CpG ODN 7909 at 10 µg/ml (CpG + IR group).
CpG + IR showed decreased clonogenic survival compared with IR alone
(P <0.05; Student’s t-test).
CpG ODN, unmethylated cytosine-phosphate-guanine motif
oligodeoxyribonucleotides
Table 1.
Comparison of radiosensitivity in Hep-2 cells treated with irradiation
(IR) alone (6 MV X-rays at 10 Gy; IR group), or with irradiation plus
unmethylated cytosine-phosphate-guanine motif oligodeoxyribonucleotides
(CpG ODN)7909 (CpG + IR group)
Group
N
D0
Dq
SERD0
IR
4.394
1.892
2.801
–
CpG + IR
2.112
1.545
1.155
1.225
Statistical significance
P <0.001
P = 0.026
P <0.001
–
The N, D0, and Dq values were
significantly decreased relative in the CpG + IR group than in the
IR group (all P <0.05; Student’s
t-test).
N, extrapolation number; D0, mean death dose;
Dq, quasi field dose; SER, sensitivity enhancement
ratio.
Dose-survival curves fitted using a multi-target single-hitting model to
demonstrate the impact of CpG ODN 7909 on irradiation (IR) of Hep-2
cells. Hep-2 cells were irradiated with 6 MV X-rays at 0, 2, 4, 6, 8,
and 10 Gy with or without CpG ODN 7909 at 10 µg/ml (CpG + IR group).
CpG + IR showed decreased clonogenic survival compared with IR alone
(P <0.05; Student’s t-test).
CpG ODN, unmethylated cytosine-phosphate-guanine motif
oligodeoxyribonucleotidesComparison of radiosensitivity in Hep-2 cells treated with irradiation
(IR) alone (6 MV X-rays at 10 Gy; IR group), or with irradiation plus
unmethylated cytosine-phosphate-guanine motif oligodeoxyribonucleotides
(CpG ODN)7909 (CpG + IR group)The N, D0, and Dq values were
significantly decreased relative in the CpG + IR group than in the
IR group (all P <0.05; Student’s
t-test).N, extrapolation number; D0, mean death dose;
Dq, quasi field dose; SER, sensitivity enhancement
ratio.
Cell cycle arrest at G2/M phase
Proportions of Hep-2 cells in G2/M phase cell cycle arrest were significantly
different between the four treatment groups (untreated control, CpG ODN 7909
only, IR only, or CpG ODN 7909 plus IR; F = 55.211,
P <0.01 at 24 h and F = 191.341,
P <0.01 at 48 h; Figure 4a and b). Compared with the
control group, a significant increase in the percentage of Hep-2 cells in the
G2/M phase was observed in the CpG group (P <0.05 at both 24
and 48 h) and the IR group (P <0.05 and P <0.01 at both
24 and 48 h). Moreover, at 24 and 48 h following IR, the percentage of cells in
G2/M phase was significantly higher in the CpG + IR group than in the IR alone
group (P <0.01 at both 24 and 48 h; Figure 4a and b).
Figure 4.
Hep-2 cell cycle assessment by flow cytometry, showing: (a)
Representative flow cytometry results at 24 and 48 h following no
treatment (control) or treatment with CpG ODN7909 alone (CpG group),
irradiation alone (IR group) or CpG plus IR; (b) The proportion of cells
in G2/M phase in the four treatment groups. Data represent the mean of
three independent experiments, and are presented as mean ± SD;
aP >0.05, control group versus CpG
group; bP <0.01, control group versus IR
group; cP <0.01, IR group versus CpG + IR
group (one-way analysis of variance using Tukey’s HSD multiple
comparisons test); G0, stationary phase; G1, first gap; M, mitosis; G2,
second gap; IR, irradiation; CpG ODN, unmethylated
cytosine-phosphate-guanine motif oligodeoxyribonucleotides
Hep-2 cell cycle assessment by flow cytometry, showing: (a)
Representative flow cytometry results at 24 and 48 h following no
treatment (control) or treatment with CpG ODN7909 alone (CpG group),
irradiation alone (IR group) or CpG plus IR; (b) The proportion of cells
in G2/M phase in the four treatment groups. Data represent the mean of
three independent experiments, and are presented as mean ± SD;
aP >0.05, control group versus CpG
group; bP <0.01, control group versus IR
group; cP <0.01, IR group versus CpG + IR
group (one-way analysis of variance using Tukey’s HSD multiple
comparisons test); G0, stationary phase; G1, first gap; M, mitosis; G2,
second gap; IR, irradiation; CpG ODN, unmethylated
cytosine-phosphate-guanine motif oligodeoxyribonucleotides
Increase of IR-induced cellular apoptosis
Significant differences were observed in Hep-2 cell apoptosis index between the
four treatment groups (F = 454.198, P <0.01
at 24 h and F = 301.354, P <0.01 at 48 h;
Figure 5a and b).
Compared with the control group, the Hep-2 cell apoptosis index was
significantly increased in the IR group (P <0.01 at 24 and
48 h) and the CpG + IR group (P <0.01 at 24 and 48 h).
Moreover, the proportion of apoptotic cells was significantly higher in Hep-2
cells treated with CpG ODN 7909 plus IR versus IR alone (P
<0.01 at 24 and 48 h). The cellular apoptosis index remained similar between
the control group and cells treated with CpG ODN 7909 alone
(P = 0.468 at 24 h and P = 0.847 at 48 h;
Figure 5a and
b).
Figure 5.
Analysis of apoptotic Hep-2 cells using annexin V/PI and flow cytometry:
(a) Representative flow cytometry results at 24 and 48 h following no
treatment (control) or treatment with CpG ODN7909 alone (CpG group),
irradiation alone (IR group) or CpG plus IR showing B1, dead cells; B2,
late apoptosis; B3, viable cells; and B4, early apoptotic cells; (b)
Apoptotic fraction of cells in the four different treatment groups; Data
presented as mean ± SD; ano statistically significant
difference (P >0.05), control group versus CpG
group; bP <0.01, control group versus IR
group; cP <0.01, IR group versus CpG + IR
group (one-way analysis of variance using Tukey’s HSD multiple
comparisons test); PI, propidium iodide; CpG ODN, unmethylated
cytosine-phosphate-guanine motif oligodeoxyribonucleotides
Analysis of apoptotic Hep-2 cells using annexin V/PI and flow cytometry:
(a) Representative flow cytometry results at 24 and 48 h following no
treatment (control) or treatment with CpG ODN7909 alone (CpG group),
irradiation alone (IR group) or CpG plus IR showing B1, dead cells; B2,
late apoptosis; B3, viable cells; and B4, early apoptotic cells; (b)
Apoptotic fraction of cells in the four different treatment groups; Data
presented as mean ± SD; ano statistically significant
difference (P >0.05), control group versus CpG
group; bP <0.01, control group versus IR
group; cP <0.01, IR group versus CpG + IR
group (one-way analysis of variance using Tukey’s HSD multiple
comparisons test); PI, propidium iodide; CpG ODN, unmethylated
cytosine-phosphate-guanine motif oligodeoxyribonucleotides
Release of IL-12 and TNF-α
A significant difference was observed in IL-12 concentration between the four
treatment groups (F = 13.166, P <0.01 at
24 h and F = 16.047, P<0.01 at 48 h).
Compared with the control group, secreted IL-12 concentration was higher in the
CpG group (21.181 ± 0.647 pg/ml versus 18.842±0.981 pg/ml at 24 h,
P <0.05; and 19.420 ± 1.165 pg/ml versus 16.165 ± 0.931
pg/ml at 48 h, P <0.05). In addition, IL-12 concentration
was significantly higher in the CpG + IR group verses IR alone (24.501 ± 1.490
pg/ml versus 18.936 ± 1.394 pg/ml at 24 h, P <0.01; and
21.616 ± 0.780 pg/ml versus 17.557 ± 1.218 pg/ml at 48 h, P
<0.01; Figure 6a). A
significant difference was also observed in the TNF-α concentration between the
four treatment groups (F = 18,843, P <0.01
at 24 h and F = 21.574, P <0.01 at 48 h).
Compared with the control group, secreted TNF-α concentration was higher in the
CpG group (28.340 ± 0.993 pg/ml versus 24.456 ± 1.440 pg/ml at 24 h,
P <0.05; and 23.303 ± 0.975 pg/ml versus 20.079 ± 0.927
pg/ml at 48 h, P <0.05). Secreted TNF-α concentration was
also significantly higher in the CpG + IR group versus IR alone (32.035 ± 1.714
pg/ml versus 25.638 ± 1.109 pg/ml at 24 h, P <0.01; and
25.923 ± 1.011 pg/ml versus 20.667 ± 1.081 pg/ml at 48 h,
P<0.01; Figure 6b).
Figure 6.
Interleukin (IL)-12 and tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-α release by Hep-2
cells measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay: (a) Cell culture
supernatant IL-12 concentrations in four groups at 24 and 48 h following
no treatment (control) or treatment with CpG ODN7909 alone (CpG group),
irradiation alone (IR group) or CpG plus IR; (b) Cell culture
supernatant TNF-α concentrations in the four treatment groups; Data
presented as mean ± SD; ⋆P <0.05, control group
versus CpG group; ⋄P <0.01, IR group versus CpG + IR
group (one-way analysis of variance using Tukey’s HSD multiple
comparisons test); CpG ODN, unmethylated cytosine-phosphate-guanine
motif oligodeoxyribonucleotides
Interleukin (IL)-12 and tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-α release by Hep-2
cells measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay: (a) Cell culture
supernatant IL-12 concentrations in four groups at 24 and 48 h following
no treatment (control) or treatment with CpG ODN7909 alone (CpG group),
irradiation alone (IR group) or CpG plus IR; (b) Cell culture
supernatant TNF-α concentrations in the four treatment groups; Data
presented as mean ± SD; ⋆P <0.05, control group
versus CpG group; ⋄P <0.01, IR group versus CpG + IR
group (one-way analysis of variance using Tukey’s HSD multiple
comparisons test); CpG ODN, unmethylated cytosine-phosphate-guanine
motif oligodeoxyribonucleotides
Discussion
The application of CpG ODNs, which recognize TLR9, has shown a remarkable degree of
synergy with conventional remedies for malignant tumours.[22-25] In the past,
TLR9 was mainly reported to be expressed in various immune
cells, including dendritic cells.[26] More recently, increasing evidence has shown that TLR9 is
also expressed in tumour tissues, which display higher levels of TLR9 than normal
tissues.[27,28] For example, TLR9 mRNA expression was found to
be higher in non-small cell lung carcinoma than in normal lung tissue,[29] and TLR9 expression was higher in laryngeal squamous cell
carcinomatumour tissue compared with adjacent normal tissues at the gene and
protein level.[30] Furthermore, this change in TLR9 was positively correlated with clinical stage.[30] The presence of TLR9 has also been reported at the mRNA and protein level in
Hep-2 cell lines by means of RT-PCR and immunohistochemistry.[31] Similarly, the present study also showed that TLR9 was
expressed in Hep-2 cells, which might be involved in enhancing the radiosensitivity
shown in the present study, possibly via mediation of CpG ODN7909 intracellular
signal transduction.The occurrence, infiltration and metastases of tumours is related to cell
proliferation, and CCK-8 can be used to evaluate cell proliferation dynamics.[32] The present results showed a decrease in CCK-8 after Hep-2 cells were exposed
to CpG ODN7909 for 24 and 48 h, indicating that cellular viability was inhibited,
and this inhibition was shown to be in a dose-dependent with increasing CpG ODN7909
concentrations. In addition, the subtoxic dose of CpG ODN7909 (at 10 μg/ml) combined
with 10 Gy X-ray radiation was shown to significantly enhance the decrease in cell
viability compared with 10 Gy X-ray radiation alone. Consistent with the present
results, the authors previously published study demonstrated that CpG ODN1826 alone
could delay the growth of Lewis lung carcinoma in mice, and the combined inhibitory
effect of CpG ODN1826 and X-ray on Lewis lung cancer was greater than X-ray
radiation alone.[33] The present study also employed clonogenic survival analysis to investigate
the role of CpG ODN7909 on radiation sensitivity in Hep-2 cells, and showed that CpG
ODN7909 combined with radiation was able to significantly inhibit Hep-2 cell colony
formation. Compared with the IR group, D0 of the combined treatment group
was 1.545 Gy versus 1.892 Gy, the N value was 2.112 versus 4.394, and Dq value was
1.155 versus 2.801, indicating that CpG ODN7909 could enhance the in
vitro sensitivity of Hep-2 cells to X-rays.Cell cycle distribution is well documented to relate to radiosensitivity, with cells
being the most sensitive to radiation during the G2/M phase and the least sensitive
at the end of S phase.[34] Therefore, mediating cell cycle progression into G2/M phase would be an
effective approach to increase the radiosensitivity of tumours. CpG ODN has been
reported to directly act on the humanlung carcinoma cell line 95D by promoting
cancer cells to move into the G2/M phase, and the signalling pathway was shown to be
mediated by TLR9.[35] Consistent with these results, the present study showed that CpG ODN7909
significantly potentiated X-ray induced cell-cycle arrest, and the number of cells
arrested at G2/M phase was significantly increased in cells treated with
CpG ODN7909 and X-ray combined, compared with X-ray alone.Apoptosis induced by irradiation is vital in the use of X-rays to eliminate tumour
cells, and it is widely recognized that irradiation-induced apoptosis may be used
for assessing the sensitivity of tumour cells to irradiation, with an increased
apoptotic rate indicating higher tumour cell radiosensitivity.[36] In the present study, CpG ODN7909 alone at 10 μg/ml could not directly induce
cellular apoptosis, but the apoptotic index was significantly increased when CpG
ODN7909 was combined with radiation. The mechanism may be that CpG ODN7909 combined
with radiation altered the cell cycle distribution, with cell arrest at G2/M phase,
in which the cells were more sensitive to radiation and were more likely to enter
the apoptotic pathway.Furthermore, the present study showed that at 24 and 48 h following irradiation,
IL-12 and TNF-α secretion by Hep-2 cells was significantly increased in cells
treated with CpG ODN7909 and X-rays combined compared with X-rays alone. IL-12 is
known to play a significant role in inhibiting tumour development and metastasis,[37] and TNF-α is a cell factor with strong direct antitumour activity, that is
reported to be closely involved with radiation sensitivity.[38] TNF-α has been shown to inhibit the proliferation of various tumour cells,
and to induce apoptosis.[39,40] One study showed that IL-12 and TNF-α could be up-regulated in
the humanglioma cell line (CHG-5) when these cells were treated with a combination
of CpG ODN and ß-rays, which apparently inhibited cell clonogenic survival.[41] Similarly, the present results showed that secretion of IL-12 and TNF-α had
an increasing trend following treatment with CpG ODN7909. The secretion of IL-12 and
TNF-α was increased more significantly following treatment with CpG ODN7909 and
X-rays combined. The present authors hypothesize that Hep-2 cells can secrete these
factors through autocrine mechanisms, and these factors may participate in improving
the roles of CpG ODN7909 on radiosensitivity of tumour cells.In conclusion, the present results showed that CpG ODN7909 combined with X-ray
radiation decreased cellular clonogenic survival and increased cellular apoptosis,
percentage of cells at G2/M phase and secretion of specific cytokines, compared with
X-ray radiation alone, suggesting that CpG ODN7909 could enhance the
radiosensitivity of Hep-2 cells in vitro. These results may provide
a clinical perspective for improvement of radiotherapy treatment effects in patients
with LSCC. However, the precise mechanisms by which TLR9 may mediate signal
transduction pathways related to radiosensitivity remain unclear, and require
further studies.
Authors: Yumin Xia; Gaurav K Gupta; Ana P Castano; Pawel Mroz; Pinar Avci; Michael R Hamblin Journal: J Biophotonics Date: 2013-08-07 Impact factor: 3.207
Authors: Kathryn A Mason; Hisanori Ariga; Robert Neal; David Valdecanas; Nancy Hunter; Arthur M Krieg; John K Whisnant; Luka Milas Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2005-01-01 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Susan C Short; Silvia Giampieri; Mulugeta Worku; Marisa Alcaide-German; George Sioftanos; Sara Bourne; Ka Ian Lio; Maya Shaked-Rabi; Christine Martindale Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2011-03-01 Impact factor: 12.300
Authors: Yang Song; Ming Yang; Hongjian Zhang; Yan Sun; Ye Tao; Huihui Li; Jing Zhang; Yuncheng Li; Jianming Yang Journal: J Immunol Res Date: 2020-12-18 Impact factor: 4.818