Literature DB >> 29238995

Test Dose Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients Receiving Once-Daily IV Busulfan Conditioning for Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant: A Reliable Approach?

Kristina M Brooks1, Paul Jarosinski2, Thomas Hughes2, Elizabeth Kang3, Nirali N Shah4, John B Le Gall4, Dennis D Hickstein5, Suk See De Ravin3, Jomy M George1, Parag Kumar1.   

Abstract

Intravenous (IV) busulfan test dose pharmacokinetics (PK) has been shown to accurately predict once-daily dose requirements and improve outcomes in adult transplant patients, but there are limited data to support this approach in children. Test doses of busulfan ∼0.8 mg/kg were infused over 2 to 3 hours, followed by serial sampling to 4-6 hours postinfusion in pediatric hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients (n = 5). Once-daily busulfan doses were calculated based on a myelosuppressive area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) target of ∼3700 to 4000 μmol·min/L and assumed dose-proportionality to the test dose. PK analysis was then repeated at full daily doses within 6-8 days of test dose administration. Plasma PK samples collected under test and full-dose conditions were analyzed using validated commercial assays and noncompartmental methods. In 4 out of 5 patients, PK estimates after once-daily IV busulfan administration differed in comparison to test dose estimates (AUC range -38.2% to +49.7%, clearance range -34.3% to +61.8%). Patients 1, 2, and 3 required increases in remaining daily busulfan doses to achieve AUC targets, and no adjustment was required in patient 4. Patient 5's AUC was 49.7% higher than expected, and he subsequently developed fatal sinusoidal obstruction syndrome. In our experience with pediatric patients, test dose PK failed to reliably predict daily dosing requirements with large discrepancies from predicted AUC targets. This article highlights the necessity for therapeutic drug monitoring of IV busulfan and inadvisability of relying solely on test-dose busulfan PK in pediatric patients. Furthermore, clinicians should consider strategies to expedite dose adjustments in real time.
© 2017, The American College of Clinical Pharmacology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  busulfan; pediatrics; pharmacokinetics; test dose; therapeutic drug monitoring

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29238995      PMCID: PMC6002873          DOI: 10.1002/jcph.1049

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Pharmacol        ISSN: 0091-2700            Impact factor:   3.126


  37 in total

1.  The pharmacokinetics and safety of twice daily i.v. BU during conditioning in pediatric allo-SCT recipients.

Authors:  J B Le Gall; M C Milone; I M Waxman; L M Shaw; L Harrison; D Duffy; C van de Ven; O Militano; M B Geyer; E Morris; M Bhatia; P Satwani; D George; J H Garvin; M B Bradley; J Schwartz; L A Baxter-Lowe; M S Cairo
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2012-06-11       Impact factor: 5.483

2.  Population pharmacokinetic-based dosing of intravenous busulfan in pediatric patients.

Authors:  Brian P Booth; Atiqur Rahman; Ramzi Dagher; Donna Griebel; Shari Lennon; David Fuller; Chandra Sahajwalla; Mehul Mehta; Jogarao V S Gobburu
Journal:  J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 3.126

3.  Up-regulation of glutathione S-transferase activity in enterocytes of young children.

Authors:  J P Gibbs; C A Liacouras; R N Baldassano; J T Slattery
Journal:  Drug Metab Dispos       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 3.922

4.  Maximally tolerated busulfan systemic exposure in combination with fludarabine as conditioning before allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation.

Authors:  Janelle B Perkins; Jongphil Kim; Claudio Anasetti; Hugo F Fernandez; Lia E Perez; Ernesto Ayala; Mohamed A Kharfan-Dabaja; Marcie R Tomblyn; Daniel M Sullivan; Joseph A Pidala; Teresa L Field
Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant       Date:  2011-12-23       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  In vivo and in vitro induction of human cytochrome P4503A4 by dexamethasone.

Authors:  J S McCune; R L Hawke; E L LeCluyse; H H Gillenwater; G Hamilton; J Ritchie; C Lindley
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 6.875

6.  Linearity and stability of intravenous busulfan pharmacokinetics and the role of glutathione in busulfan elimination.

Authors:  Shlomo Almog; Daniel Kurnik; Avichai Shimoni; Ronen Loebstein; Eyal Hassoun; Asher Gopher; Hillel Halkin; Arnon Nagler
Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant       Date:  2010-06-30       Impact factor: 5.742

7.  Busulfan in infant to adult hematopoietic cell transplant recipients: a population pharmacokinetic model for initial and Bayesian dose personalization.

Authors:  Jeannine S McCune; Meagan J Bemer; Jeffrey S Barrett; K Scott Baker; Alan S Gamis; Nicholas H G Holford
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2013-11-11       Impact factor: 12.531

8.  Age-dependent pharmacokinetic profile of single daily dose i.v. busulfan in children undergoing reduced-intensity conditioning stem cell transplant.

Authors:  W T Tse; R Duerst; J Schneiderman; S Chaudhury; D Jacobsohn; M Kletzel
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2009-02-02       Impact factor: 5.483

9.  Accurately Achieving Target Busulfan Exposure in Children and Adolescents With Very Limited Sampling and the BestDose Software.

Authors:  Michael Neely; Michael Philippe; Teresa Rushing; Xiaowei Fu; Michael van Guilder; David Bayard; Alan Schumitzky; Nathalie Bleyzac; Sylvain Goutelle
Journal:  Ther Drug Monit       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 3.681

10.  Fludarabine with pharmacokinetically guided IV busulfan is superior to fixed-dose delivery in pretransplant conditioning of AML/MDS patients.

Authors:  B S Andersson; P F Thall; B C Valdez; D R Milton; G Al-Atrash; J Chen; A Gulbis; D Chu; C Martinez; S Parmar; U Popat; Y Nieto; P Kebriaei; A Alousi; M de Lima; G Rondon; Q H Meng; A Myers; J Kawedia; L L Worth; M Fernandez-Vina; T Madden; E J Shpall; R B Jones; R E Champlin
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2016-12-19       Impact factor: 5.483

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Review of the Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Intravenous Busulfan in Paediatric Patients.

Authors:  Rachael Lawson; Christine E Staatz; Christopher J Fraser; Stefanie Hennig
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2020-10-30       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 2.  Total Body Irradiation Forever? Optimising Chemotherapeutic Options for Irradiation-Free Conditioning for Paediatric Acute Lymphoblastic Leukaemia.

Authors:  Khalil Ben Hassine; Madeleine Powys; Peter Svec; Miroslava Pozdechova; Birgitta Versluys; Marc Ansari; Peter J Shaw
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2021-12-10       Impact factor: 3.418

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.