Literature DB >> 22198540

Maximally tolerated busulfan systemic exposure in combination with fludarabine as conditioning before allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation.

Janelle B Perkins1, Jongphil Kim, Claudio Anasetti, Hugo F Fernandez, Lia E Perez, Ernesto Ayala, Mohamed A Kharfan-Dabaja, Marcie R Tomblyn, Daniel M Sullivan, Joseph A Pidala, Teresa L Field.   

Abstract

Systemic exposure to high-dose busulfan has been correlated with efficacy and toxicity after hematopoietic cell transplantation for malignancy. We used the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) to prospectively determine the maximally tolerated systemic exposure to i.v. busulfan when given once daily after fludarabine administered at 40 mg/m(2) for 4 days. Three target AUC levels were planned: 6,000, 7,500, and 9,000 μM-min. Included were patients 16 to 65 years old, with a hematologic malignancy, an HLA A, B, or C, DRB1 8/8 or 7/8 matched donor, Karnofsky performance status ≥70%, and adequate organ function. For level 1 patients, i.v. busulfan doses 1 and 2 were 170 mg/m(2)/day, then doses 3 and 4 were adjusted based on first-dose pharmacokinetic modeling to achieve an average daily AUC of 6,000 μM-min. Doses 1 and 2 for the subsequent cohorts were based on the level 1 data: 180 mg/m(2)/day for AUC 7,500 μM-min (level 2) and 220 mg/m(2)/day for AUC 9,000 μM-min (level 3), with pharmacokinetic targeting for doses 3 and 4. Pharmacokinetic analysis after the last dose showed that 88% of the patients had been exposed to a mean AUC within 10% of the target. Forty patients were treated at level 1, 29 patients at level 2, and three patients at level 3. DLT was veno-occlusive disease of the liver, which occurred in none of 40 patients (0%) at level 1, two of 29 patients (7%) at level 2, and three of three patients (100%) at level 3. Dermatitis (P < .01) and pulmonary toxicity (P = .01) were also increased at higher AUC levels. Level 2 (7,500 μM-min × 4 days) was the maximally tolerated AUC. Within the confines of the trial's small sample size, there was no suggestion that escalating busulfan AUC from 6,000 to 7,500 μM-min × 4 days increased nonrelapse mortality. Assessment of the higher busulfan AUC on relapse prevention requires trials in patients with a homogeneous risk of relapse.
Copyright © 2012 American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22198540     DOI: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2011.12.584

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant        ISSN: 1083-8791            Impact factor:   5.742


  20 in total

1.  Harmonization of Busulfan Plasma Exposure Unit (BPEU): A Community-Initiated Consensus Statement.

Authors:  Jeannine S McCune; Christine M Quinones; James Ritchie; Paul A Carpenter; Erik van Maarseveen; Rosa F Yeh; Claudio Anasetti; Jaap J Boelens; Nelson Hamerschlak; Moustapha Hassan; Hyoung Jin Kang; Yoshinobu Kanda; Angelo Paci; Miguel-Angel Perales; Peter J Shaw; Victoria L Seewaldt; Bipin N Savani; Angela Hsieh; Betsy Poon; Mohamad Mohty; Michael A Pulsipher; Marcelo Pasquini; L Lee Dupuis
Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant       Date:  2019-05-25       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Pharmacokinetically-targeted BU and fludarabine as conditioning before allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for adults with ALL in first remission.

Authors:  G Kunter; J B Perkins; J Pidala; T Nishihori; M A Kharfan-Dabaja; T Field; H Fernandez; L Perez; F Locke; E Ayala; M Tomblyn; J L Ochoa-Bayona; B Betts; M Nieder; C Anasetti
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2013-09-02       Impact factor: 5.483

3.  Pharmacometabonomic Prediction of Busulfan Clearance in Hematopoetic Cell Transplant Recipients.

Authors:  Sandi L Navarro; Timothy W Randolph; Laura M Shireman; Daniel Raftery; Jeannine S McCune
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2016-07-20       Impact factor: 4.466

4.  Prolonged sirolimus administration after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation is associated with decreased risk for moderate-severe chronic graft-versus-host disease.

Authors:  Joseph Pidala; Jongphil Kim; Melissa Alsina; Ernesto Ayala; Brian C Betts; Hugo F Fernandez; Teresa Field; Heather Jim; Mohamed A Kharfan-Dabaja; Frederick L Locke; Asmita Mishra; Taiga Nishihori; Leonel Ochoa-Bayona; Lia Perez; Marcie Riches; Claudio Anasetti
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2015-04-03       Impact factor: 9.941

5.  Therapeutic drug monitoring for either oral or intravenous busulfan when combined with pre- and post-transplantation cyclophosphamide.

Authors:  Lindsey R Lombardi; Christopher G Kanakry; Marianna Zahurak; Nadira Durakovic; Javier Bolaños-Meade; Yvette L Kasamon; Douglas E Gladstone; William Matsui; Ivan Borrello; Carol Ann Huff; Lode J Swinnen; Robert A Brodsky; Richard F Ambinder; Ephraim J Fuchs; Gary L Rosner; Richard J Jones; Leo Luznik
Journal:  Leuk Lymphoma       Date:  2015-10-12

6.  Comparing i.v. BU dose intensity between two regimens (FB2 vs FB4) for allogeneic HCT for AML in CR1: a report from the Acute Leukemia Working Party of EBMT.

Authors:  M A Kharfan-Dabaja; M Labopin; A Bazarbachi; R M Hamladji; D Blaise; G Socié; B Lioure; A Bermudez; L Lopez-Corral; R Or; W Arcese; N Fegueux; A Nagler; M Mohty
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2014-06-30       Impact factor: 5.483

7.  Predictors of overall survival among patients treated with sirolimus/tacrolimus vs methotrexate/tacrolimus for GvHD prevention.

Authors:  F Khimani; J Kim; L Chen; E Dean; V Rizk; B Betts; T Nishihori; F Locke; A Mishra; L Perez; E Ayala; M Kharfan-Dabaja; M Nieder; H Fernandez; C Anasetti; J Pidala
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2017-04-03       Impact factor: 5.483

8.  Test Dose Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients Receiving Once-Daily IV Busulfan Conditioning for Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant: A Reliable Approach?

Authors:  Kristina M Brooks; Paul Jarosinski; Thomas Hughes; Elizabeth Kang; Nirali N Shah; John B Le Gall; Dennis D Hickstein; Suk See De Ravin; Jomy M George; Parag Kumar
Journal:  J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2017-12-14       Impact factor: 3.126

9.  Incorporation of GSTA1 genetic variations into a population pharmacokinetic model for IV busulfan in paediatric hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

Authors:  Tiago Nava; Nastya Kassir; Mohamed Aziz Rezgui; Chakradhara Rao Satyanarayana Uppugunduri; Patricia Huezo-Diaz Curtis; Michel Duval; Yves Théoret; Liane E Daudt; Catherine Litalien; Marc Ansari; Maja Krajinovic; Henrique Bittencourt
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2018-04-27       Impact factor: 4.335

10.  Cyclophosphamide followed by intravenous targeted busulfan for allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation: pharmacokinetics and clinical outcomes.

Authors:  Andrew R Rezvani; Jeannine S McCune; Barry E Storer; Ami Batchelder; Aiko Kida; H Joachim Deeg; George B McDonald
Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant       Date:  2013-04-10       Impact factor: 5.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.