Literature DB >> 29238563

A biogeographical study on tropical flora of southern China.

Hua Zhu1.   

Abstract

The tropical climate in China exists in southeastern Xizang (Tibet), southwestern to southeastern Yunnan, southwestern Guangxi, southern Guangdon, southern Taiwan, and Hainan, and these southern Chinese areas contain tropical floras. I checked and synonymized native seed plants from these tropical areas in China and recognized 12,844 species of seed plants included in 2,181 genera and 227 families. In the tropical flora of southern China, the families are mainly distributed in tropical areas and extend into temperate zones and contribute to the majority of the taxa present. The genera with tropical distributions also make up the most of the total flora. In terms of geographical elements, the genera with tropical Asian distribution constitute the highest proportion, which implies tropical Asian or Indo-Malaysia affinity. Floristic composition and geographical elements are conspicuous from region to region due to different geological history and ecological environments, although floristic similarities from these regions are more than 90% and 64% at the family and generic levels, respectively, but lower than 50% at specific level. These differences in the regional floras could be influenced by historical events associated with the uplift of the Himalayas, such as the southeastward extrusion of the Indochina geoblock, clockwise rotation and southeastward movement of Lanping-Simao geoblock, and southeastward movement of Hainan Island. The similarity coefficients between the flora of southern China and those of Indochina countries are more than 96% and 80% at family and generic levels, indicating their close floristic affinity and inclusion in the same biogeographically floristic unit.

Entities:  

Keywords:  floristic affinity; floristic composition; geographical elements; geological histories; southern China; tropical flora

Year:  2017        PMID: 29238563      PMCID: PMC5723605          DOI: 10.1002/ece3.3561

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecol Evol        ISSN: 2045-7758            Impact factor:   2.912


INTRODUCTION

The existence of tropical flora and distinct tropical rain forest vegetation in the biogeography of southwestern China was first pointed out by Fedorov (1957, 1958); however, Chinese botanist Wu (1965) clarified the tropical affinity of the flora of China based on the analysis of the geographical elements associated with Chinese seed plants at the generic level. Whitmore (1982, 1990) confirmed the presence of the Southeast Asian rain forest in southern China with a short visit in 1980. Species‐rich tropical forests, which exist along much of China's southern border, were found to share conspicuous ecological and floristic similarity to forests in SE Asia (Zhu, 1997, 2008a,b, 2017a; Zhu, Cao, & Hu, 2006). The earliest compiled local flora for the tropical areas of China was made for Hainan Island (South China Botanical Institute, 1964–1977), but there is a need for a panoramic work to fully understand the biodiversity of the tropical flora of China, especially for conservation efforts. In this article, the floristic composition, geographical elements, floristic variation, and possible evolution of the tropical flora of China are investigated, and the possible influences by geohistorical events associated with the uplift of the Himalayas have been also discussed.

GEOGRAPHY

Areas with a tropical climate in China include southeastern Xizang (Tibet), southwestern to southeastern Yunnan, southwestern Guangxi, southern Guangdon, southern Taiwan, and Hainan. Both climatic and physical zonation indicate that the tropical zone is generally south of the Tropic of Cancer, with the exception of parts of southwest China (National Committee of Atlas Compilations, 1999), although the precise demarcation line for the tropical area has been debatable and varyingly applied. A line at c. 22°30′N was tentatively suggested as the northern boundary of the tropical zone in south and southeastern China based on the biogeographical patterns of Chinese seed plants, such as the dominance of tropical genera in this area (Zhu, 2013a; Zhu, Ma, Yan, & Hu, 2007). This line corresponds well with the currently recognized northern boundary of the tropical monsoon and rain forests of China (Wu, 1980; Zhang, 2007; Zhu, 2017a). Despite a slightly lower annual cumulative temperature in the region of southern China surrounding c. 22°30′N, tropical genera account for more than 80% of the total genera in the lowland floras and exhibit a Southeast Asian floristic affinity (Zhu, 2008a,b, 2013a; Zhu & Roos, 2004; Zhu et al., 2007). This line also coincides with the demarcation between two established floristic regions in China, the East Asiatic Kingdom (Wu & Wu, 1996) or Holarctic Kingdom, and the Paleotropical Kingdom (Takhtajan, 1978). The location of a boundary at c. 22°30′N is additionally supported by a similar periphery line drawn by Ashton (2014) to distinguish major zonal forest formations of lowland tropical Asia based on herbarium specimens and personal experience. I suggest that using the 22°30′N borderline is a suitable biogeographical boundary for the tropical areas in south and southeastern China, see Figure 1.
Figure 1

Borderline suggested as the biogeographically northern boundary for the tropical area in south and southeastern China. (The figure was made by the Landscape Ecology Lab., Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanical Garden, CAS)

Borderline suggested as the biogeographically northern boundary for the tropical area in south and southeastern China. (The figure was made by the Landscape Ecology Lab., Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanical Garden, CAS)

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Based on the biogeographical boundary for the tropical areas in south and southeastern China, data on the respective tropical floras from these southern China provinces were collected: Motuo of Xizang (Yang & Zhou, 2015), southern Yunnan (Zhu & Yan, 2012), southeastern Yunnan (Zhu & Yan, 2009), southwestern Guangxi (Qin & Liu, 2010), and Hainan (Xing, Zhou, Wang, Zeng, & Liu, 2012). I checked and synonymized the native seed plants from these tropical areas in China, and was able to recognize 12,844 species of seed plants comprising of 2,181 genera in 227 families (not including Taiwan due to the lack of a tropical plant checklist) (see Appendix S1 and S2). The circumscriptions of families followed the APG III and APG IV technique (APG, 2009, 2016; Chase & Reveal, 2009), and I followed w3TROPICOS ( http://mobot.mobot.org/W3T/Search/vast.html) for species nomenclature. Patterns of seed plant distribution were quantified at the generic and the family levels following Wu (1991) and Wu, Zhou, Sun, Li, and Peng (2006) and placed in the following categories: cosmopolitan, pantropic, tropical Asia and tropical America disjuncted, Old World tropics, tropical Asia to tropical Australia, tropical Asia to tropical Africa, tropical Asia, north temperate, East Asia and North America disjuncted, Old World temperate, temperate Asia, Mediterranean region, West to Central Asia, Central Asia, East Asia, and Endemic to China. The biogeographical affinity of the flora was investigated using geographical elements at the family and generic levels. For further understanding, both the tropical Asian affinity of the Chinese tropical flora and comparisons between the tropical flora of China and Indochina peninsula countries are made using the data from the floras of Laos (Zhu, 2017b), Myanmar (Kress, DePilipps, Farr, & Kyi, 2003), Thailand (Smitinand, 2001), and Vietnam (Chan, 1999; Zhu, Yan, & Qin, 2003). As the usual, I use the similarity coefficients at family and generic levels to clarify the affinity between these regional floras in this article.

RESULTS

Floristic composition

I was able to recognize 12,844 species of seed plants comprising of 2,181 genera and 227 families from the tropical areas of southern China. Among them were 14 families, which comprised of more than 200 species each, such as Ochidaceae (823 species/153 genera), Fabaceae (692 species/118 genera), Poaceae (630/170), Rubiaceae (534/81), Asteraceae (484/114), Lamiaceae (398/75), Lauraceae (345/18), and Euphorbiaceae (335/62); 23 families with 100–200 species, such as Gesneriaceae (186/34), Moraceae (183/10), Asclepiadaceae (179/41), Theaceae (169/13), Zingiberaceae (167/20), Araliaceae (145/21), Vitaceae (142/9), and Rutaceae (136/20) (Table 1).
Table 1

Dominant (top 30) families in species richness with their distribution

Family ranking by their species richnessNumber of genusNumber of speciesDistribution typea
Orchidaceae1538321
Fabaceae1186922
Poaceae1706301
Rubiaceae815341
Asteraceae1144841
Lamiaceae753981
Lauraceae183452
Euphorbiaceae623352
Rosaceae363291
Cyperaceae333011
Urticaceae242742
Ericaceae142571
Fagaceae82488
Acanthaceae562212
Gesneriaceae341863
Moraceae101831
Asclepiadaceae411792
Theaceae131692
Zingiberaceae201675
Araliaceae211453
Vitaceae91422
Rutaceae201362
Celastraceae121332
Scrophulariaceae351311
Cucurbitaceae261282
Ranunculaceae201281
Apocynaceae311272
Araceae281242
Melastomataceae191242
Myrsinaceae51222

Distribution type: 1: cosmopolitan, 2: pantropic, 3 tropical Asia and tropical America disjuncted, 5: tropical Asia to tropical Australia, 8: north temperate.

Dominant (top 30) families in species richness with their distribution Distribution type: 1: cosmopolitan, 2: pantropic, 3 tropical Asia and tropical America disjuncted, 5: tropical Asia to tropical Australia, 8: north temperate. The majority of the families with more than 200 species were determined to have a cosmopolitan distribution, but families with 100–200 species generally showed a pantropic distribution. I found that less species‐rich families were dominant and characteristic in the tree canopy layers of the southern China tropical forests, and exhibited a strict tropical distribution. These families were as follows: Sapingdaceae, Anacardiaceae, Burseraceae, Elaeocarpaceae, Ebenaceae, Combretaceae, Myrtaceae, Clusiaceae, Dilleniaceae, Dipterocarpaceae, Myristicaceae, Icacinaceae, Ixonanthaceae, Sapotaceae, Sterculiaceae. The species‐rich genera in Chinese tropical floras are Ficus (131 species), Rhododendron (112 species, mainly in southeastern Xizang and southeastern Yunnan), Rubus (102), Elatostema (100 species), Lithocarpus (99), Ilex (95), Bulbophyllum (74), Litsea (70), Dendrobium (67), Syzygium (66), Ardisia (62), Camellia (62), Piper (62), and Tetrastigma (61). Similar to the geographical patterns of families, I found that the majority of species‐rich genera presented a pantropic distribution, but did extend into temperate areas.

Biogeographical elements

The pantropic distribution at the family level makes up the highest ratio, with 86 families representing 37.89% of the total. Further, we found that cosmopolitan families make up 20.70%, and the north temperate families make up 13.66% (Table 2). The total tropical distributions (Type 2‐7) consisted of 132 families, contributing to 58.15%, whereas the temperate distributions totaled (Type 8‐15) 48 families, contributing only 21.15%.
Table 2

Areal types at family level in the tropical flora of southern China

Areal types of familyNo. of family%
1 Cosmopolitan4720.70
2 Pantropic8637.89
3 Tropical Asia and tropical America disjuncted146.17
4 Old World tropics104.41
5 Tropical Asia to tropical Australasia93.96
6 Tropical Asia to tropical Africa31.32
7 Tropical Asia (Indo‐Malaysia)104.41
2–7 (Total tropical elements)(132)(58.15)
8 North temperate3113.66
9 E. Asia and N. America disjuncted93.96
10 Old World temperate10.44
11 Temperate Asia00.00
12 Mediterranean, West Asia to Central Asia00.00
13 Central Asia00.00
14 East Asia73.08
15 Endemic to China00.00
8–15 (Total temperate elements)(48)(21.15)
Total227100.00
Areal types at family level in the tropical flora of southern China At the generic level, tropical distributions (Type 2‐7) contribute to 67.22% (Table 3); among them, the tropical Asian distribution had the highest ratio, making up 26.04% of the total genera. These include Aganosma, Alphonsea, Ammora, Aphanamixis, Chukrasia, Crypteronia, Gynostemma, Knema, Mitrephora, Pterospermum. The second highest distributional class was the pantropic distribution, which made up 15.82%, and included Beilschmiedia, Capparis, Cleidion, Cryptocarya, Dioscorea, Gnetum, Lasianthus, Marsdenia, Millettia, Morinda. Old World tropical distributions were 7.66% and included Fissistigma, Dracaena, Pandanus, Polyalthia, Stephania, Syzigium, Thunbergia, Ventilago. For the tropical Asia to tropical Australasia distribution, they included Argyreia, Dischidia, Dillenia, Hoya, Lagerstroemia, Loeseneriella, Murraya, Wendlandia and made up 9.08%. Lastly, the distributions of tropical Asia to tropical Africa comprised of 6.01%, and included the following: Anogeissus, Bombax, Flacourtia, Garcinia, Ixora, Mitragyna, Premna, Quisqualis, Toddalia.
Table 3

Areal types at generic level in the tropical flora of southern China

Areal types of generaNo. of genus%
1 Cosmopolitan924.22
2 Pantropic34515.82
3 Tropical Asia and tropical America disjuncted572.61
4 Old World tropics1677.66
5 Tropical Asia to tropical Australasia1989.08
6 Tropical Asia to tropical Africa1316.01
7 Tropical Asia (Indo‐Malaysia)56826.04
2–7 (Total tropical elements)(1,466)(67.22)
8 North temperate1908.71
9 East Asia and North America disjuncted793.62
10 Old World temperate733.35
11 Temperate Asia160.73
12 Mediterranean, West Asia to Central Asia60.28
13 Central Asia50.23
14 East Asia1788.16
15 Endemic to China763.48
8–15 (Total temperate elements)(623)(28.56)
Total2,181100.00
Areal types at generic level in the tropical flora of southern China Temperate distributions in total (Types 8‐15) made up 28.56% of the total genera, of which the north temperate distribution contributed 8.71%. Genera in this distribution included Betula, Carpinus, Cornus, Pinus, Salix, Sorbus. I found that 8.16% of the genera belonged to the East Asian distribution and included Actinidia, Belamcanda, Cephalotaxus, Gardneria, Hovenia, Pegia, Skimmia, Stachyurus. Further, the East Asia and North America disjuncted distribution made up 3.62% of the total; genera in this distribution were Castanopsis, Illicium, Magnolia, Mahonia, Nyssa, Photinia, Schisandra. I found 76 Chinese endemic genera, contributed 3.48%; examples included Camptotheca, Parakmeria, Sargentodoxa, Tapiscia, Tetrapanax, Tutcheria. The flora of southern China consisted mostly of tropical genera; however, it has 48 families of temperate distribution, contributing to 21.15% of the total families, and 623 temperate genera, making up 28.56% of the total. While the flora of southern China has some features of marginal tropical distribution, it clearly shows the tropical Asian affinity.

Variation in floristic composition and geographical elements of the tropical flora

The flora of southern China shows conspicuous variations in floristic composition from region to region. Despite this, I found that the floristic similarities at the family and generic levels were more than 90% and 64%, respectively, but at the specific level, there is less than 50% similarity among the compared regional floras from southwestern China to southeastern China (Table 5). More similar dominant families and genera exist between southeastern Xizang (Tibet) and southeastern Yunnan, especially the families Ericaceae and Aralicaceae (Zhu, 2017c).
Table 5

Comparison of floristic similarities at the family, generic, and specific levels between the tropical floras across southern China

Compared florasFlora of Motuo, Xizang (159 families, 737 genera, 1,790 species)b Flora of southern Yunnan (192 families, 1,240 genera, 4,150 species)c Flora of southeastern Yunnan (191 families, 1,350 genera, 4,987 species)d Flora of southwestern Guangxi (182 families, 1,006 genera, 2,681 species)e Flora of Hainan (196 families, 1,282 genera, 3,893 species)f
Similarity coefficients at family levela
Flora of Motuo, Xizang100
Flora of southern Yunnan93.71100
Flora of southeastern Yunnan99.3793.19100
Flora of southwestern Guangxi94.9793.4195.05100
Flora of Hainan91.1992.718990.66100
Similarity coefficients at generic levela
Flora of Motuo, Xizang100
Flora of southern Yunnan72.86100
Flora of southeastern Yunnan83.3180.81100
Flora of southwestern Guangxi64.9975.4584.59100
Flora of Hainan64.3172.0267.4771.47100
Similarity coefficients at specific levela
Flora of Motuo, Xizang100
Flora of southern Yunnan32.74100
Flora of southeastern Yunnan39.9453.33100
Flora of southwestern Guangxi18.9940.148.71100
Flora of Hainan17.9936.432.634.13100

aSimilarity coefficient between A and B = the number of taxa shared by both A and B divided by the lowest number of taxa of A or B, multiplied by 100%.

b,c,d,e,fData from references as Table 4.

Comparison of areal types of genera between the tropical floras across southern China aData from Yang and Zhou (2015); bdata from Zhu and Yan (2012); cdata from Zhu and Yan (2009); ddata from Qin and Liu (2010), the native plants of tropical southwestern Guangxi were abstracted from this reference; edata from Xing et al. (2012). In comparing floras, the tropical element is the most consistent regional geographical element. However, I found that the floras of southern and southeastern Yunnan possessed higher portions of tropical Asian elements, whereas the flora of Hainan has the highest ratio of the pantropic element. Additionally, the tropical flora of southeastern Tibet (Xizang) contained the lowest tropical elements of all investigated genera, while the Hainan flora has the highest ratio of the tropical elements (Table 4).
Table 4

Comparison of areal types of genera between the tropical floras across southern China

Areal types of generaFlora of Motuo, Xizang %a Flora of southern Yunnan %b Flora of southeastern Yunnan %c Flora of southwestern Guangxi %d Flora of Hainan %e
1 Cosmopolitan7.604.674.575.435.07
2 Pantropic16.4220.4717.6920.0623.07
3 Tropical Asia and tropical America disjuncted2.852.502.212.962.88
4 Old World tropics6.389.918.559.1911.46
5 Tropical Asia to tropical Australasia8.1410.726.049.9813.18
6 Tropical Asia to tropical Africa4.755.727.004.456.24
7 Tropical Asia (Indo‐Malaysia)16.2827.7227.3423.2223.77
2–7 (Total tropical elements)(54.82)(77.03)(69.00)(69.86)(80.5)
8 North temperate15.065.488.187.714.60
9 East Asia and North America disjuncted5.162.583.463.952.49
10 Old World temperate3.662.342.362.961.56
11 Temperate Asia0.680.400.440.490.31
12 Mediterranean, West Asia to Central Asia0.540.240.220.300.16
13 Central Asia0.140.160.070.000.00
14 East Asia11.945.888.847.113.74
15 Endemic to China0.411.213.022.171.48
8–15 (Total temperate elements)(37.58)(18.29)(26.59)(24.7)(14.34)
Total100100100100100.00

aData from Yang and Zhou (2015); bdata from Zhu and Yan (2012); cdata from Zhu and Yan (2009); ddata from Qin and Liu (2010), the native plants of tropical southwestern Guangxi were abstracted from this reference; edata from Xing et al. (2012).

Comparison of floristic similarities at the family, generic, and specific levels between the tropical floras across southern China aSimilarity coefficient between A and B = the number of taxa shared by both A and B divided by the lowest number of taxa of A or B, multiplied by 100%. b,c,d,e,fData from references as Table 4.

Comparison to the floras of Indochina countries

The flora of southern China has distinct similarities at both the family and generic levels with the floras of Indochina countries (Table 6). They have similar coefficients at the family level and share more than 96%, and at generic level more than 80%. The family level coefficients between southern China and across Indochina countries are nearly identical; however, at the generic level, the highest similarity exists between southern China and Laos, up to 85.22%. The tropical flora of southern China undoubtedly belongs to the same biogeographical unit as those of Indochina countries.
Table 6

Comparison of floristic similarities at the family and generic levels between the tropical flora of southern China and Indochina countries

Compared floraVietnam (231 families, 2,018 genera)Laos (188 families, 1,373 genera)Thailand (201 families, 1,475 genera)Myanmar (220 families, 1,903 genera)
Similarity coefficients at family level (%)a
Tropical flora of China96.4897.8797.0196.36
Similarity coefficients at generic level (%)a
Tropical flora of China80.4885.2280.7580.35

Similarity coefficient between A and B = the number of taxa shared by both A and B divided by the lowest number of taxa of A or B, multiplied by 100%.

Comparison of floristic similarities at the family and generic levels between the tropical flora of southern China and Indochina countries Similarity coefficient between A and B = the number of taxa shared by both A and B divided by the lowest number of taxa of A or B, multiplied by 100%.

DISCUSSION

The differences seen between the characteristics and evolution of tropical floras of southern China could be influenced in large part by geohistorical events associated with the uplift of the Himalayas, such as the southeastward extrusion of the Indochina geoblock, the clockwise rotation and southeastward movement of Lanping–Simao geoblock, the divergent geological histories between southern and southeastern Yunnan during the Tertiary, as well as the southeastward movement of Hainan Island. The Indian continent collided with Asia around 50 Ma (Rowley, 1996) causing the uplift of the Himalayas, resulting in the continuous deformation of southwestern China, a large clockwise rotation, and southeastward extrusion of Indochina (Chen, Dobson, Heller, & Hao, 1995; Funahara, Nishiwaki, Murata, Otofuji, & Wang, 1993; Harrison, Chen, Leloup, Ryerson, & Tapponnier, 1992; Leloup et al., 1995; Morley, 2002) (Figure 2). The Simao Terrane, which forms the present western and southern parts of Yunnan in southwestern China, has been suggested as one of the prominent fragments of the extruded Indochina block (Sato, Liu, Zhu, Yang, & Otofuji, 1999, 2001; Sato et al., 2007). As a whole, the Simao Terrane was displaced southward by 800 km and rotated clockwise 30° (Figure 3). The rotation processes are believed to have remained active until at least the Miocene (Chen et al., 1995; Schärer et al., 1990). Such geological events may have directly affected the evolution of the flora of southwestern China (Zhu, 2012, 2013b, 2015).
Figure 2

Tectonic model for the Tertiary evolution of strike–slip faults and Indochina excursion in SE Asia. (The figure was redrawn from Morley, 2002; Figure 2, by the Landscape Ecology Lab., Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanical Garden, CAS)

Figure 3

Clockwise rotation and southeastward extrusion of Langping–Simao and Indochina geoblocks during late Eocene (Redrawn from Sato et al., 2001, Figure 7)

Tectonic model for the Tertiary evolution of strike–slip faults and Indochina excursion in SE Asia. (The figure was redrawn from Morley, 2002; Figure 2, by the Landscape Ecology Lab., Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanical Garden, CAS) Clockwise rotation and southeastward extrusion of Langping–Simao and Indochina geoblocks during late Eocene (Redrawn from Sato et al., 2001, Figure 7) Paleomagnetic studies indicate that during the Mesozoic, Hainan Island was in effect connected to North Vietnam and Guangxi (Mo & Shi, 1987). Blocks reconstruction of Asia reveals that Hainan Island was in a position adjacent to North Vietnam and Guangxi at 40 Ma (Replumaz & Tapponnier, 2003). From the late Mesozoic to early Cenozoic, the Beibu Gulf lithosphere was drawn away, and Hainan moved southeast along the Red River fault and revolved clockwise to its present location (Ma et al., 2014). The Red River fault system also gave rise to the Tonkin Gulf in a widespread extension across a 100‐km‐wide zone prior to 30 Ma (Rangin, Klein, Roques, Le Pichon, & Van Trong, 1995). This evidence suggests the geological evolution of the Tonkin‐Beibu Gulf may have caused Hainan Island's southeast moment. Rock magnetism and paleomagnetism show that Hainan was 5–6° north of its present geographic position in the late Cretaceous (Fu et al., 2010; Liu & Morinaga, 1999). However, it has also been suggested that the rotation of Hainan Island may have occurred during the mid‐Tertiary, when large‐scale left‐lateral motion occurred along the Red River fault as a result of the collision of the Indian Plate into Eurasia, causing extrusion of the Indochina block and the opening of the South China Sea (Li, Metcalfe, & Wang, 1995). Recent biogeographical evidence suggests that Hainan Island may have been in contact with northern Vietnam and Guangxi during the Eocene and drifted to its present location by moving southeast due to the extrusion of the Indochina block (Zhu, 2016a). In this study, dominant families and genera shared higher similarities between southeastern Tibet (Xizang) and southeastern Yunnan could be explained by the geological history in southwestern China. In the late Eocene India collided with northern Myanmar and Tibet and since the late Cretaceous, northern Myanmar and Tibet have moved northward relative to the Asian plate to the east (Mitchell, 1993). With the southeastward extrusion of the Indochina geoblock, the Lanping–Simao geoblock experienced clockwise rotation and southeastward movement (Chen et al., 1995; Funahara et al., 1993; Harrison et al., 1992; Leloup et al., 1995; Sato et al., 1999, 2001, 2007) causing southeastern Yunnan to move further southward related to the northwestern Yunnan. These events may have shaped the distribution pattern along the so‐called Tanaka line (Tanaka, 1954; Zhu & Yan, 2003) and may have resulted in more similar dominant families and genera, especially between southeastern Xizang (Tibet) (contacting with northwestern Yunnan) and southeastern Yunnan. The floras of southern and southeastern Yunnan have higher portions of the tropical Asian elements compared with other tropical floras in China, which could be the influence of the southeastward extrusion of the Indochina geoblock. Although the two regions share 80% of their genera, 237 genera are restricted to southern Yunnan, and 349 genera to tropical southeastern Yunnan. Furthermore, 57 genera exhibit an East Asian distribution, 53 genera show a north temperate distribution, 22 genera are endemic to China, and 17 genera display an East Asia and North American disjuncted distribution and are found only in tropical southeastern Yunnan (Zhu, 2013b). The flora of southeastern Yunnan is more closely related to eastern Asian flora, while the flora of southern Yunnan is more closely related to Indo‐Malaysian flora. Despite the proximity of the southern and southeastern Yunnan flora, they display distinct differences suggesting they originated from different geoblocks and perhaps a biogeographical boundary should exist between them (Figure 4). This biogeographical line between the tropical floras of southern and southeastern Yunnan was suggested as the “Hua line” (Zhu, 2011, 2013b). Evidence for this biogeographical line is presented by Zhang et al. (2012) using a cluster analysis of species’ presence/absence in Yunnan and their phylogenetic relatedness, taxonomic composition, and regional phylogenetic structure (Li, Kraft, Yang, & Wang, 2015).
Figure 4

Main geoblocks in Southeast Asia (from Fortey & Cocks, 1998)

Main geoblocks in Southeast Asia (from Fortey & Cocks, 1998) After the southeast movement resulting from the uplift of the Himalayas and the extrusion of the Indochina block from its location near Vietnam and Guangxi during the Eocene, the present Hainan Island has a typical tropical climate at 18°10′04″–20°9′40″N in the southernmost of China, which results in the highest number of tropical elements in its flora (Zhu, 2016a). The flora of Taiwan appears to mainly derive from the East Asian flora due to the uplifting of the island after the Late Tertiary, although tropical flora is found in the southernmost part of Taiwan with its tropical climate (Zhu, 2016b). The uplift of the Himalayas influenced global climate and other environmental changes (Raymo & Ruddimen, 1992; Shi, Li, & Li, 1998; Shi et al., 1999). The uplift of the Himalayas 2.4 Ma occurred quickly with an increase in elevation of 6000 m. This increase in elevation is believed to have created the eastern Asian monsoon climate leading to the tropical and subtropical climate currently occurring on the southwestern China lowland, and thus initiating the evolution of the tropical flora and vegetation in these southern regions of China (Liu, Zhang, & Yuan, 1998). Therefore, the origin and evolution of the tropical flora and vegetation in southern China are related to the geological events and climate changes associated with the uplift of the Himalayas in the southern regions of China. Due to the clear similarities at the family and generic levels between the tropical flora of southern China and those of the Indochina countries, it appears the tropical flora of southern China has a close affinity with these countries and biogeographically belongs to the same floristic unit in the viewpoint.

CONCLUSION

The tropical region in China has generally been recognized as the area on the northern edge of tropical Asia, and includes southeastern Xizang (Tibet), southern Yunnan, southwestern Guangxi, southern Guangdong, southern Taiwan, and Hainan Island. Based on present floristic records and data from these tropical areas of China, 12,844 species of seed plants included in 2,181 genera and 227 families are recognized. The families are mainly distributed in tropical areas and extend into temperate zones and contribute to the majority of the flora of southern China. Genera with tropical distributions also make up a greater part of the total flora indicating that the flora of southern China is of marginal tropics. In geographical elements, the genera with tropical Asian distributions comprise the highest proportion among the various distribution types, supporting a tropical Asian or Indo‐Malaysia affinity of the tropical flora of China. Additionally, the tropical flora of China shows conspicuous variations in floristic composition and geographical elements from region to region due to different geological history and ecological environments. Despite this, the floristic similarities at the family and generic levels are more than 90% and 64%, respectively, but lower than 50% at specific level among the compared regional floras from southwestern China to southeastern China. I found that there are more similar dominant families and genera, and also higher similarities at these levels between southeastern Xizang (Tibet) and southeastern Yunnan. The floras of southern and southeastern Yunnan have higher portions of the tropical Asian elements compared with other tropical floras in China, although they have the highest similarity at the specific level. The dominant families and genera have noticeable differences between them; specifically, the flora of Hainan has the highest ratio of tropical elements, of which the pantropic element has the highest portion. Evidently, the differences in characteristics and evolution of these regional tropical floras could very well be influenced by geohistorical events associated with the uplift of the Himalayas, such as the southeastward extrusion of the Indochina geoblock, clockwise rotation, and southeastward movement of Lanping–Simao geoblock, divergent geological histories between southern and southeastern Yunnan, and southeastward movement of Hainan Island. The comparison of the similarity coefficients between the flora of southern China and Indochina countries shows 96% and 80% similarity at the family and generic levels, respectively, indicating their close floristic affinity and inclusion in the same biogeographical floristic unit.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This project was funded by The National Natural Science Foundation of China (41471051, 31170195, 41071040). The database was made by Yan Lichun from Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences. English editing was completed by TopEdit (www.topedit.cn). The author would like to the thank reviewers’ constructive suggestions on this article.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

None declared.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

HZ contributed to the conceptualization, data curation, formal analysis, funding acquisition, investigation, methodology, project administration, resources, validation visualization, writing‐original draft, and writing‐review and editing. Click here for additional data file. Click here for additional data file.
  6 in total

1.  Biogeographical divergence of the flora of Yunnan, southwestern China initiated by the uplift of Himalaya and extrusion of Indochina block.

Authors:  Zhu Hua
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-09-24       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  A phylogenetically informed delineation of floristic regions within a biodiversity hotspot in Yunnan, China.

Authors:  Rong Li; Nathan J B Kraft; Jie Yang; Yuhua Wang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-03-30       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Biogeographical Evidences Help Revealing the Origin of Hainan Island.

Authors:  Hua Zhu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-04-07       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  A biogeographical study on tropical flora of southern China.

Authors:  Hua Zhu
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-10-30       Impact factor: 2.912

5.  Floristic characteristics and affinities in Lao PDR, with a reference to the biogeography of the Indochina peninsula.

Authors:  Hua Zhu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-06-23       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  The floras of southern and tropical southeastern Yunnan have been shaped by divergent geological histories.

Authors:  Zhu Hua
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-05-28       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total
  2 in total

1.  A biogeographical study on tropical flora of southern China.

Authors:  Hua Zhu
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-10-30       Impact factor: 2.912

2.  Genetic diversity and population structure in the endangered tree Hopea hainanensis (Dipterocarpaceae) on Hainan Island, China.

Authors:  Chen Wang; Xiang Ma; Mingxun Ren; Liang Tang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-11-30       Impact factor: 3.240

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.