| Literature DB >> 29238533 |
Matúš Hrivnák1, Ladislav Paule1, Diana Krajmerová1, Şemsettin Kulaç2, Hakan Şevik3, İbrahim Turna4, Irina Tvauri5,6, Dušan Gömöry1.
Abstract
The eastern-Mediterranean Abies taxa, which include both widely distributed species and taxa with minuscule ranges, represent a good model to study the impacts of range size and fragmentation on the levels of genetic diversity and differentiation. To assess the patterns of genetic diversity and phylogenetic relationships among eastern-Mediterranean Abies taxa, genetic variation was assessed by eight nuclear microsatellite loci in 52 populations of Abies taxa with a focus on those distributed in Turkey and the Caucasus. Both at the population and the taxon level, the subspecies or regional populations of Abies nordmanniana s.l. exhibited generally higher allelic richness, private allelic richness, and expected heterozygosity compared with Abies cilicica s.l. Results of both the structure analysis and distance-based approaches showed a strong differentiation of the two A. cilicica subspecies from the rest as well as from each other, whereas the subspecies of A. nordmanniana were distinct but less differentiated. ABC simulations were run for a set of scenarios of phylogeny and past demographic changes. For A. ×olcayana, the simulation gave a poor support for the hypothesis of being a taxon resulting from a past hybridization, the same is true for Abies equi-trojani: both they represent evolutionary branches of Abies bornmuelleriana.Entities:
Keywords: Abies bornmuelleriana; Abies cilicica; Abies equi‐trojani; Abies nordmanniana; Approximate Bayesian Computation; diversity; phylogeny
Year: 2017 PMID: 29238533 PMCID: PMC5723589 DOI: 10.1002/ece3.3519
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ecol Evol ISSN: 2045-7758 Impact factor: 2.912
Figure 1Scheme of speciation sequence in eastern‐Mediterranean Abies based on Linares (2011) with modification
Figure 2Results of the whole‐dataset structure analysis superimposed over the map of the eastern‐Mediterranean. Charts represent inferred membership proportions of the studied populations. Distribution ranges of individual taxa (www.euforgen.org/species) are displayed in colors corresponding to the predominant structure cluster
Genetic variation characteristics of the studied Mediterranean fir taxa (mean ± standard deviation)
| Taxon | Population level | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 31.0 ± 1.4 | 6.15 ± 1.26 | 0.02 ± 0.01 | 0.750 ± 0.063 | 0.0564 |
|
| 31.0 ± 1.0 | 7.10 ± 0.35 | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 0.751 ± 0.016 | 0.0446 |
|
| 29.5 ± 2.5 | 7.63 ± 0.94 | 0.05 ± 0.05 | 0.743 ± 0.042 | 0.0359 |
|
| 26.6 ± 7.9 | 7.22 ± 0.41 | 0.05 ± 0.04 | 0.716 ± 0.049 | 0.0280 |
|
| 29.4 ± 3.7 | 7.98 ± 0.82 | 0.05 ± 0.05 | 0.751 ± 0.024 | 0.0267 |
| subsp. | 29.7 ± 0.5 | 7.62 ± 1.31 | 0.04 ± 0.05 | 0.748 ± 0.055 | 0.0313 |
| subsp. | 30.0 ± 0.0 | 7.40 ± 0.08 | 0.02 ± 0.01 | 0.761 ± 0.008 | −0.0027 |
| × | 34.0 | 7.09 | 0.11 | 0.722 | — |
|
| 29.6 ± 0.7 | 6.16 ± 0.87 | 0.06 ± 0.06 | 0.666 ± 0.055 | 0.1371 |
| subsp. | 29.6 ± 0.8 | 6.68 ± 0.36 | 0.08 ± 0.06 | 0.693 ± 0.045 | 0.0378 |
| subsp. | 29.7 ± 0.5 | 5.24 ± 0.71 | 0.02 ± 0.02 | 0.636 ± 0.052 | 0.0562 |
|
| 0.0035 | 0.2113 | 0.0015 | ||
|
| 0.0002 | 0.8226 | <0.0001 | ||
N, number of sampled individuals; H e, expected heterozygosity; A[x], allelic richness after rarefaction to x gene copies; P[x], private allelic richness after rarefaction to x gene copies; F ST, coefficient of differentiation within taxon/region; P 1 and P 2, significance of the Kruskal–Wallis test of the differences among subspecies and among species, respectively; NA, not applied.
Analysis of molecular variance among Mediterranean fir taxa at the species and subspecies/taxon level
| Source of variation |
| Variance component |
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Abs. | % |
| ||||
| Subspecies/taxa | 8 | 0.0451 | 5.25 | <.0001 | 0.0525 |
|
| Populations | 43 | 0.0252 | 2.94 | <.0001 | 0.0310 |
|
| Within populations | 3006 | 0.7888 | 91.81 | <.0001 | ||
| Total | 3057 | 0.8591 | 100 | 0.0819 |
| |
| Species | 3 | 0.0473 | 5.40 | <.0001 | 0.0540 |
|
| Populations | 48 | 0.0394 | 4.50 | <.0001 | 0.0475 |
|
| Within populations | 3006 | 0.7888 | 90.10 | <.0001 | ||
| Total | 3057 | 0.8755 | 100 | 0.0990 |
| |
Figure 3Discriminant analysis of principal components of the Abies nordmanniana populations. Only centroids and inertia ellipses are shown. Ann, A. nordmanniana s.s.; Anb, A. nordmanniana subsp. bornmuelleriana; Ane, A. nordmanniana subsp. equi‐trojani; Axo, Abies ×olcayana
Figure 4Neighbor‐net chart of the studied populations based on pairwise genetic distances (; Weir & Cockerham, 1984)
Posterior estimates of the parameters of the demographic inference based on the Approximate Bayesian Computation for the best‐supported scenarios in different constellations of Mediterranean fir taxa or regional populations
| Parameter | Mode | 95% Confidence interval |
|---|---|---|
|
| ||
| Posterior probability | 0.7547 | 0.7427–0.7666 |
|
| 32,300 | 12,100–57,200 |
|
| 63,200 | 28,700–93,800 |
|
| 10,400 | 2,960–19,400 |
|
| 5212 (78 ± 26 ky | 152–2,000 |
|
| 2,790 (419 ± 139 ky) | 931–8,720 |
|
| ||
| Posterior probability of scenario 2 | 0.9156 | 0.9089–0.9224 |
|
| 4,260 | 950–84,400 |
|
| 26,200 | 9,470–57,300 |
|
| 84,500 | 45,400–98,900 |
|
| 25,800 | 8,620–75,900 |
|
| 2,010 (301 ± 101 ky) | 490–7,650 |
|
| 24,900 (3.73 ± 1.25My) | 18,600–110,000 |
|
| ||
| Posterior probability of scenario 1 | 0.6080 | 0.5945–6,215 |
|
| 1,690 | 1,180–35,100 |
|
| 26,700 | 8,060–56,700 |
|
| 72,500 | 35,500–97,000 |
|
| 82,400 | 48,300–98,200 |
|
| 37,900 | 13,500–93,400 |
|
| 4,610 (692 ± 231 ky) | 924–9,390 |
|
| 4,140 (621 ± 207 ky) | 723–9,220 |
|
| 20,500 (3.08 ± 1.03 My) | 7,510–58,700 |
|
| ||
| Posterior probability of scenario 1 | 0.8247 | 0.8148–0.8345 |
|
| 16,400 | 6,290–74,700 |
|
| 83,200 | 26,000–98,200 |
|
| 4,630 (695 ± 232 ky) | 1,070–61,200 |
N e, effective population size; t, time of divergence.
Aa, A. alba; Ane, A. nordmanniana subsp. equi‐trojani; Axo, A. ×olcayana; Anb, A. nordmanniana subsp. bornmuelleriana; Ann, A. nordmanniana s.s. (S and N for the southern and northern part, respectively); Aci, A. cilicica subsp. isaurica; Acc, A. cilicica subsp. cilicica.
Posterior probabilities for the scenarios with the highest posterior probability of 10,000 sets of summary statistics most similar to the observed data through logistic regression.
Generations.
1 generation = 150 ± 50 years.