| Literature DB >> 29238303 |
Bumseok Namgung1,2, Yan Cheng Ng1,3, Hwa Liang Leo1, Joseph M Rifkind4, Sangho Kim1,2,3.
Abstract
Red blood cell (RBC) deformability has a significant impact on microcirculation by affecting cell dynamics. Despite previous studies that have demonstrated the margination of rigid cells and particles in vitro, little information is available on the in vivo margination of deformability-impaired RBCs under physiological flow and hematocrit conditions. Thus, in this study, we examined how the deformability-dependent, RBC migration alters the cell distribution under physiological conditions, particularly in arteriolar network flows. The hardened RBCs (hRBCs) were found to preferentially flow near the vessel walls of small arterioles (diameter = 47.1-93.3 μm). The majority of the hRBCs (63%) were marginated within the range of 0.7R-0.9R (R: radial position normalized by vessel radius), indicating that the hRBCs preferentially accumulated near the vessel walls. The laterally marginated hRBCs maintained their lateral positions near the walls while traversing downstream with attenuated radial dispersion. In addition, the immediate displacement of RBCs while traversing a bifurcation also contributes to the near-wall accumulation of hRBCs. The notable difference in the inward migration between the marginated nRBCs and hRBCs after bifurcations further supports the potential role of bifurcations in the accumulation of hRBCs near the walls.Entities:
Keywords: RBC deformability; RBC margination; bifurcation flow; hemodynamics; microcirculation
Year: 2017 PMID: 29238303 PMCID: PMC5712576 DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2017.00963
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Physiol ISSN: 1664-042X Impact factor: 4.566
Figure 1Determination of radial position of cells. (A) Microscopic images of a labeled hRBC in stasis condition and corresponding line intensity profiles with 2-μm vertical shifts of the microscope stage. (B) Typical light intensity profile across the vessel with a RBC flowing near the vessel wall. Radial position of the cell was determined at the center of the cell width (marked as *).
Systemic parameters.
| Before | 94 ± 17 | 76 ± 16 | 63 ± 17 | 42 ± 1.0 | 13.8 ± 2.5 |
| After | 93 ± 19 | 75 ± 17 | 52 ± 9 | 41 ± 1.0 | 13.2 ± 1.8 |
Values are in mean ± SD. MAP, mean arterial pressure; ID, inner diameter of vessel; PSR, pseudoshear rate (mean velocity / ID); Hct, hematocrit; M-value, aggregation index.
Figure 2Deformability of nRBCs and hRBCs. EI is defined by major (α) and minor (β) axes of ellipsoid diffraction pattern from the ekatacytometer. Standard deviation was too small to be noticed (n = 4).
Figure 3Radial distribution of hRBCs in vivo. (A) Fluorescent image of two labeled hRBCs flowing near the vessel walls in an arteriole (ID = 55.1 ± 2.9 μm, averaged along longitudinal direction). The overlaid cell trajectory image was obtained by continuously taking the maximum intensity of the consecutive images of cell flow (cumulative maximum intensity image). Scale bar = 50 μm. (B) Probability distribution for the radial position of hRBCs (A total of 112 cells were analyzed from six different vessels). A solid line represent a hyperbolic regression fit for experimental data (y = a·tanh(1 – x)·sech (x – c) where a = 1.443, b = 62.23, c = 0.8431; R2 = 0.4). (C) Dispersion coefficient of hRBCs at R0 = 0.81 and R0 = 0.58 (n = 7); *p < 0.05.
Figure 4Immediate margination of hRBC. (A) Consecutive in vivo images of hRBC (white dotted circle) flowing over 65 ms in an arteriole (ID = 50.2 ± 1.5 μm). Scale bar = 50 μm. (B) Normalized radial position (R) (left) and trajectory (right) of hRBC in (A).
Figure 5Difference in migration dynamics between nRBCs and hRBCs across the bifurcation (BF) in the in vitro system. (A) Normalized lateral position (L) of the target RBCs in the main channel before the bifurcation. The lateral position (L) and travel distance (Dm) of the target RBCs were normalized by the half width (w/2) and the full width (w) of the channel, respectively. Each line (solid and dashed) represents a linear regression fit of the data. (y = −2.8 × 10−4x + 0.86; R2 = 0.61 for nRBCs, y = −0.44 × 10−4x + 0.87; R2 = 0.17 for hRBCs). (B) Normalized lateral position (L) of the target RBCs at 0Dm and 0Dd across the bifurcation. The dashed line with an arrow indicates the transit of RBC (*p < 0.0001). (C) Normalized lateral position (L) of the target RBCs in the daughter channel after the bifurcation. Each line (solid and dashed) represents a linear regression fit of the data. (y = −5.51 × 10−3x + 0.79; R2 = 0.90 for nRBCs, y = −0.30 × 10−3x + 0.83; R2 = 0.91 for hRBCs; *p < 0.0001; significant difference between two slopes). A total of 300 cells (150 nRBCs and 150 hRBCs) were analyzed for each data point.
Figure 6Potential role of bifurcation in radial migration of nRBCs (N) and hRBCs (H). The dashed lines with arrows indicated the trajectories of each RBC. N′ and H′ represent the nRBCs and hRBCs after the 1st bifurcating point (BF1) while N″ and H″ represent the nRBCs and hRBCs after the 2nd bifurcating point (BF2), respectively. OW and IW stand for the outer and inner walls, respectively.