| Literature DB >> 29238110 |
Tetsuro Hida1, Kei Ando1, Kazuyoshi Kobayashi1, Kenyu Ito1, Mikito Tsushima1, Akiyuki Matsumoto1, Masayoshi Morozumi1, Satoshi Tanaka1, Masaaki Machino1, Kyotaro Ota1, Shunsuke Kanbara1, Sadayuki Ito1, Yoshihiro Nishida1, Naoki Ishiguro1, Shiro Imagama1.
Abstract
Surgical site infections (SSIs) are one of the most serious complications in spine surgery. We investigated the efficacy of locally administered vancomycin (VCM) powder for prophylaxis on SSI after invasive spine surgery. We retrospectively studied 174 consecutive patients who underwent spine surgery. In patients of the VCM group (n = 81), VCM powder was administered in the wound before closing wound. Patients who did not receive VCM treatment were set as a control group (n = 93). We compared the patients' background, operation time, intraoperative blood loss, usage of implants, presence of deep SSI, and side effects between the two groups. There were no significant differences between the groups in age, gender, and BMI. The operation time and the intraoperative blood loss were longer and greater in the VCM group than in the control group (P < 0.005, P < 0.001, respectively). Implants were used in 85% of the VCM group, and in 31% of the control group (P < 0.001). Deep SSI was not observed in the VCM group, whereas it was observed in 4 patients in the control group. No side effects were observed in any of the cases. In conclusion, surgeons applied VCM for cases which were invasive or had a high risk of infection. However, deep SSI was not observed in anyone in the VCM group. The intrawound administration of VCM might be effective to prevent SSI in cases with high risks of infection.Entities:
Keywords: intrawound administration; local administration; spine surgery; surgical site infection; vancomycin hydrochloride
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29238110 PMCID: PMC5719213 DOI: 10.18999/nagjms.79.4.545
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nagoya J Med Sci ISSN: 0027-7622 Impact factor: 1.131