| Literature DB >> 29237395 |
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Temnothorax (Formicidae: Myrmicinae) is a diverse genus of ants found in a broad spectrum of ecosystems across the northern hemisphere. These diminutive ants have long served as models for social insect behavior, leading to discoveries about social learning and inspiring hypotheses about the process of speciation and the evolution of social parasitism. This genus is highly morphologically and behaviorally diverse, and this has caused a great deal of taxonomic confusion in recent years. Past efforts to estimate the phylogeny of this genus have been limited in taxonomic scope, leaving the broader evolutionary patterns in Temnothorax unclear. To establish the monophyly of Temnothorax, resolve the evolutionary relationships, reconstruct the historical biogeography and investigate trends in the evolution of key traits, I generated, assembled, and analyzed two molecular datasets: a traditional multi-locus Sanger sequencing dataset, and an ultra-conserved element (UCE) dataset. Using maximum likelihood, Bayesian, and summary-coalescent based approaches, I analyzed 22 data subsets consisting of 103 ingroup taxa and a maximum of 1.8 million base pairs in 2485 loci.Entities:
Keywords: Ants; Leptothorax; Phylogenomics; Rapid radiations; Social parasite; Ultraconserved elements
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29237395 PMCID: PMC5729518 DOI: 10.1186/s12862-017-1095-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Evol Biol ISSN: 1471-2148 Impact factor: 3.260
Fig. 1Approximate global distribution of the ant genus Temnothorax, indicated in black. Red triangles represent collection localities of specimens used in this study for gene sequencing
Fig. 2Bayesian inference (BI) phylogeny of the ant genus Temnothorax, including myrmicine outgroups, estimated with the ‘rcluster’ partitioned analysis of a concatenated 2098-locus ultra-conserved element (UCE) dataset. Cladogram with support values from 25 distinct analyses represented at each node (left) contrasted with a phylogram from the same analysis (right). Yellow highlighted cells indicate that the corresponding analysis diverged topologically from the result depicted in the cladogram. Nodes that were subject to topology experiments are indicated with lowercase roman numerals
Fig. 3a Bayesian inference (BI) phylogeny of the ant genus Temnothorax, including myrmicine outgroups, estimated with a constrained, partitioned analysis of a concatenated 10-gene dataset. Node support values are given in Bayesian posterior probability (PP) and maximum likelihood bootstraps (BS); the latter were generated in a separate maximum likelihood (ML) analysis. A node support key is provided in the figure. For all nodes that do not conform to the three categories given, actual support values are noted as PP/BS. The topology of two nodes in the Palearctic III clade were divergent between BI and ML analyses; these nodes are indicated by asterisks. Node constraints used in the BI and ML analyses are indicated by numbers in black boxes. Clade and species group designations suggested by this study or which were supported are shown in black to the right of the phylogram, while species groups from the literature that were found to be paraphyletic are in grey. (b-k) Images of exemplar species of the clades and subclades designated in this study, from antweb.org (b) Leptothorax acervorum Fabricius 1793, worker, profile view, CASENT0173138, photo: April Nobile. c Temnothorax paiute Snelling et al. 2014, worker, profile view, CASENT0005932, photo: Marek Borowiec. d T. poeyi Wheeler 1913, worker, profile view, CASENT0106241, photo: Michael Branstetter. e T. semiruber André 1881, worker, profile view, CASENT0281557, photo: Estella Ortega. f T. rugatulus Emery 1895, worker, profile view, CASENT0102843, photo: Jen Fogarty. g T. obturator Wheeler 1903, worker, profile view, CASENT0104756, photo: April Nobile. h T. pergandei Emery 1895, worker, profile view, CASENT0172989, photo: April Nobile. i T. ravouxi André 1896, worker, profile view, CASENT0173641, photo: April Nobile. j T. unifasciatus Latrielle 1798, worker, profile view, CASENT0173188, photo: April Nobile. k T. muellerianus Finzi 1922, worker, profile view, CASENT0270722, photo: Shannon Hartman
Fig. 4Chronogram of the core formicoxenines, sensu Ward et al. [2], from a BEAST analysis, with Temnothorax praecreolus and the myrmicine outgroups not shown. Bars depict the 95% HPD (highest posterior density). Biogeographical history as inferred from an average of six models tested in BioGeoBEARS is superimposed on the chronogram. Nodes with two areas indicate taxon occupancy of both realms
Results of the stepping-stone topology tests on the Sanger sequencing dataset at nodes indicated in Fig. 2
| node | hypothesis | run 1 | run 2 | run 3 | run 4 | mean | 2lnBF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| i | [rottenbergi clade[salvini clade, obturator clade, Palearctic clade]] (H0) | −79,370.44 | −79,369.39 | −79,371.1 | −79,376.09 | −79,370.35 | −6.96 |
| [rugatulus clade[salvini clade, obturator clade, Palearctic clade]] (H1) | −79,368.98 | −79,365.99 | −79,366.52 | −79,369.67 | −79,366.87 | ||
| ii | [obturator clade, salvini clade] (H0) | −79,366.2 | −79,367.15 | −79,371.6 | −79,368.39 | −79,367.18 | −0.62 |
| [obturator clade, Palearctic clade] (H1) | −79,368.98 | −79,365.99 | −79,366.52 | −79,369.67 | −79,366.87 | ||
| iii | [iris subclade, tricarinatus group] (H0) | −79,368.98 | −79,365.99 | −79,366.52 | −79,369.67 | −79,366.87 | −6.94 |
| [iris subclade, mmp11 group] (H1) | −79,368.52 | −79,362.01 | −79,371.47 | −79,369.57 | −79,363.4 | ||
| [iris subclade, tricarinatus group] (H0) | −79,368.98 | −79,365.99 | −79,366.52 | −79,369.67 | −79,366.87 | 2.26 | |
| [tricarinatus group, mmp11 group] (H1) | −79,373.33 | −79,366.63 | −79,371.94 | −79,371.57 | −79,368 | ||
| [iris subclade, mmp11 group] (H0) | −79,368.52 | −79,362.01 | −79,371.47 | −79,369.57 | −79,363.4 | 9.2 | |
| [tricarinatus group, mmp11 group] (H1) | −79,373.33 | −79,366.63 | −79,371.94 | −79,371.57 | −79,368 | ||
| iv | [Gauromyrmex, Vombisidris] (H0) | −79,370.23 | −79,372.61 | – | – | −79,370.83 | −5.76 |
| [Gauromyrmex[Vombisidris, LGG, Temnothorax]] (H1) | −79,367.86 | −79,368.04 | – | – | −79,367.95 | ||
| [Gauromyrmex, Vombisidris] (H0) | −79,370.23 | −79,372.61 | – | – | −79,370.83 | 7.48 | |
| [Vombisidris[Gauromyrmex, LGG, Temnothorax]] (H1) | −79,375.57 | −79,374.08 | – | – | −79,374.57 | ||
| [Gauromyrmex[Vombisidris, LGG, Temnothorax]] (H0) | −79,367.86 | −79,368.04 | – | – | −79,367.95 | 13.24 | |
| [Vombisidris[Gauromyrmex, LGG, Temnothorax]] (H1) | −79,375.57 | −79,374.08 | – | – | −79,374.57 |
Fig. 5Results from ancestral state estimation of nesting habit and social parasitism in the core formicoxenines sensu Ward et al. [2], as inferred from an average of all models tested with HiSSE. Branches are painted according to transitions between arboreal (white) and terrestrial (black) nesting habitat. Pie diagrams at nodes indicate the likelihood of arboreal vs. terrestrial nesting habitat. Symbols on branches indicate transitions between states, as indicated in the key. Arrows between species indicate parasite/host relationships