Literature DB >> 36137088

Color, activity period, and eye structure in four lineages of ants: Pale, nocturnal species have evolved larger eyes and larger facets than their dark, diurnal congeners.

Robert A Johnson1, Ronald L Rutowski1.   

Abstract

The eyes of insects display an incredible diversity of adaptations to enhance vision across the gamut of light levels that they experience. One commonly studied contrast is the difference in eye structure between nocturnal and diurnal species, with nocturnal species typically having features that enhance eye sensitivity such as larger eyes, larger eye facets, and larger ocelli. In this study, we compared eye structure between workers of closely related nocturnal and diurnal above ground foraging ant species (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in four genera (Myrmecocystus, Aphaenogaster, Temnothorax, Veromessor). In all four genera, nocturnal species tend to have little cuticular pigment (pale), while diurnal species are heavily pigmented (dark), hence we could use cuticle coloration as a surrogate for activity pattern. Across three genera (Myrmecocystus, Aphaenogaster, Temnothorax), pale species, as expected for nocturnally active animals, had larger eyes, larger facet diameters, and larger visual spans compared to their dark, more day active congeners. This same pattern occurred for one pale species of Veromessor, but not the other. There were no consistent differences between nocturnal and diurnal species in interommatidial angles and eye parameters both within and among genera. Hence, the evolution of eye features that enhance sensitivity in low light levels do not appear to have consistent correlated effects on features related to visual acuity. A survey across several additional ant genera found numerous other pale species with enlarged eyes, suggesting these traits evolved multiple times within and across genera. We also compared the size of the anterior ocellus in workers of pale versus dark species of Myrmecocystus. In species with larger workers, the anterior ocellus was smaller in pale than in dark species, but this difference mostly disappeared for species with smaller workers. Presence of the anterior ocellus also was size-dependent in the two largest pale species.

Entities:  

Year:  2022        PMID: 36137088      PMCID: PMC9499225          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0257779

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.752


  42 in total

1.  Evolution and ecology of spider coloration.

Authors:  G S Oxford; R G Gillespie
Journal:  Annu Rev Entomol       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 19.686

Review 2.  Adaptations for nocturnal vision in insect apposition eyes.

Authors:  Birgit Greiner
Journal:  Int Rev Cytol       Date:  2006

Review 3.  Behavioural environments and niche construction: the evolution of dim-light foraging in bees.

Authors:  William T Wcislo; Simon M Tierney
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  2008-11-22

4.  Oceili: a celestial compass in the desert ant cataglyphis.

Authors:  K Fent; R Wehner
Journal:  Science       Date:  1985-04-12       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 5.  Moving in Dim Light: Behavioral and Visual Adaptations in Nocturnal Ants.

Authors:  Ajay Narendra; J Frances Kamhi; Yuri Ogawa
Journal:  Integr Comp Biol       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 3.326

6.  Ocellar structure is driven by the mode of locomotion and activity time in Myrmecia ants.

Authors:  Ajay Narendra; Willi A Ribi
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 3.312

Review 7.  Evolution and development in cave animals: from fish to crustaceans.

Authors:  Meredith Protas; William R Jeffery
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Dev Biol       Date:  2012 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.814

8.  Visual ecology of Indian carpenter bees II: adaptations of eyes and ocelli to nocturnal and diurnal lifestyles.

Authors:  Hema Somanathan; Almut Kelber; Renee M Borges; Rita Wallén; Eric J Warrant
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2009-04-11       Impact factor: 1.836

9.  Same but different: Socially foraging ants backtrack like individually foraging ants but use different mechanisms.

Authors:  Cody A Freas; Jenna V Congdon; Nicola J R Plowes; Marcia L Spetch
Journal:  J Insect Physiol       Date:  2019-09-11       Impact factor: 2.354

10.  Comparative transcriptomics reveals the molecular genetic basis of pigmentation loss in Sinocyclocheilus cavefishes.

Authors:  Chunqing Li; Hongyu Chen; Yinchen Zhao; Shanyuan Chen; Heng Xiao
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2020-11-19       Impact factor: 2.912

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.