| Literature DB >> 29237070 |
Bastian Joffroy1, Yavuz O Uca1, Domen Prešern2, Jonathan P K Doye2, Thorsten L Schmidt1,3.
Abstract
Biophysical properties of DNA such as its longitudinal and torsional persistence length govern many processes and phenomena in biology, DNA nanotechnology and biotechnology. It has, for example, long been known that the circularization efficiency of short DNA fragments shows a periodic pattern where fragments with integer helical turns circularize much more efficiently than those with odd helical half turns due to stronger stacking of duplex ends. Small DNA circles can serve as templates for rolling circle amplification (RCA), which is a common and extremely robust amplification mechanism for nucleic acids. We discovered a strong template length-dependent amplification efficiency bias of RCA with the same periodicity as B-DNA. However, stacking cannot explain the mechanism behind this bias as the presence of the polymerase in the bifurcation fork inhibits base stacking of ends. Instead, coarse-grained molecular dynamics simulations imply that different amplification efficiencies come from a varying fraying probability of the last two downstream base pairs. We conclude that an increased strain-promoted fraying probability can increase the polymerization rate compared to a relaxed template.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29237070 PMCID: PMC5778537 DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkx1238
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nucleic Acids Res ISSN: 0305-1048 Impact factor: 16.971
Figure 1.Workflow to study length-dependent amplification bias of RCA. (A) Equimolar ratios of single-stranded circular DNA templates of different length were pooled in one reaction tube. (B) These template mixes were amplified in the same tube by RCA by a strand displacement polymerase (e.g. Phi29 polymerase). (C) A restriction digest with nicking enzymes yielded monomeric copies of the circular templates of different length. (D) The relative length-dependent amplification efficiency was determined by denaturing PAGE (schematic).
Figure 2.Preparation and circularization of template pools. (A) Each template contained the same constant region and a randomized region (poly-N) of varying length. The constant regions included a restriction site. The linear templates were circularized by splint ligation. (B) To be able to distinguish individual bands in PAGE, templates ranging from 67 to 95 nt were split into three pools (I, II, III) containing each template length at equimolar ratios. The linear pools (L) and circularized pools (C) were analyzed by PAGE.
Figure 3.Determination of amplification efficiency. (A) The pools containing DNA templates of different length were amplified separately by RCA. The resulting concatemers were cut by nicking enzymes into linear monomers (B) which were separated by denaturing PAGE. (C) Intensity profile of an individual lane. Each point in the intensity profile corresponds to the sum of gray values of the pixels in one row. Gaussian curves were fitted to the profile to determine band intensities. Two example fits are shown. (D) The amplification efficiencies were normalized and plotted against the template length.
Figure 4.Different conformations of the minicircle polymerase complex and the resulting effects. (A) The bias for Bst 2.0 and Phi29 pol (independent dataset from Figure 3D). The pitch length is 10.4 nt. (B) Fraying probability of the first and second base of the downstream template (for clarity not drawn to the same scale). The baseline of fraying (dashed) is with a linear DNA strand in the polymerase configuration. (C) A model of a simulated fraying experiment with minimal fraying. The relative conformation of the last base pair in the template tunnel, the last incorporated dNTP and the 3 nt in the downstream tunnel (highlighted in black) were fixed in the simulations. The location of the polymerase is indicated by the dotted oval. (D and E) Sketch of two minicircles differing in half a helical turn highlighting the location of the last base pairs subject to fraying. Further examples can be found in Supplementary Figure S5. D is depicted roughly as in C. (F–H) Models of the crystal structure of Phi29 polymerase in different orientations (PDB crystal structure: 2PZS) (47).