Literature DB >> 29236900

Influence of implantoplasty on stress distribution of exposed implants at different bone insertion levels.

João Paulo Mendes Tribst1, Amanda Maria de Oliveira Dal Piva1, Jamil Awad Shibli2, Alexandre Luiz Souto Borges1, Rubens Nisie Tango1.   

Abstract

This study evaluated the effect of implantoplasty on different bone insertion levels of exposed implants. A model of the Bone Level Tapered implant (Straumann Institute, Waldenburg, Switzerland) was created through the Rhinoceros software (version 5.0 SR8, McNeel North America, Seattle, WA, USA). The abutment was fixed to the implant through a retention screw and a monolithic crown was modeled over a cementation line. Six models were created with increasing portions of the implant threads exposed: C1 (1 mm), C2 (2 mm), C3 (3 mm), C4 (4 mm), C5 (5 mm) and C6 (6 mm). The models were made in duplicates and one of each pair was used to simulate implantoplasty, by removing the threads (I1, I2, I3, I4, I5 and I6). The final geometry was exported in STEP format to ANSYS (ANSYS 15.0, ANSYS Inc., Houston, USA) and all materials were considered homogeneous, isotropic and linearly elastic. To assess distribution of stress forces, an axial load (300 N) was applied on the cusp. For the periodontal insert, the strains increased in the peri-implant region according to the size of the exposed portion and independent of the threads' presence. The difference between groups with and without implantoplasty was less than 10%. Critical values were found when the inserted portion was smaller than the exposed portion. In the exposed implants, the stress generated on the implant and retention screw was higher in the models that received implantoplasty. For the bone tissue, exposure of the implant's thread was a damaging factor, independent of implantoplasty. Implantoplasty treatment can be safely used to control peri-implantitis if at least half of the implant is still inserted in bone.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29236900     DOI: 10.1590/1807-3107bor-2017.vol31.0096

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Braz Oral Res        ISSN: 1806-8324


  8 in total

1.  Impact of peri-implant bone resorption, prosthetic materials, and crown to implant ratio on the stress distribution of short implants: a finite element analysis.

Authors:  Pinar Ercal; Aysegul Erten Taysi; Demet Cagil Ayvalioglu; Meltem Mert Eren; Soner Sismanoglu
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2021-03-17       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  The importance of correct implants positioning and masticatory load direction on a fixed prosthesis.

Authors:  João-Paulo-Mendes Tribst; Vinicius-Aneas Rodrigues; Amanda-Maria-de Oliveira Dal Piva; Alexandre-Luiz-Souto Borges; Renato-Sussumu Nishioka
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2018-01-01

3.  Disinfection and Biocompatibility of Titanium Surfaces Treated with Glycine Powder Airflow and Triple Antibiotic Mixture: An In Vitro Study.

Authors:  Mario Alovisi; Massimo Carossa; Narcisa Mandras; Janira Roana; Massimo Costalonga; Lorenza Cavallo; Enrico Pira; Maria Grazia Putzu; Davide Bosio; Ilaria Roato; Federico Mussano; Nicola Scotti
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-12       Impact factor: 3.748

4.  The Influence of Custom-Milled Framework Design for an Implant-Supported Full-Arch Fixed Dental Prosthesis: 3D-FEA Sudy.

Authors:  João Paulo Mendes Tribst; Amanda Maria de Oliveira Dal Piva; Roberto Lo Giudice; Alexandre Luiz Souto Borges; Marco Antonio Bottino; Ettore Epifania; Pietro Ausiello
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-06-05       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  Influence of thickness and incisal extension of indirect veneers on the biomechanical behavior of maxillary canine teeth.

Authors:  Victória Luswarghi Souza Costa; João Paulo Mendes Tribst; Eduardo Shigueyuki Uemura; Dayana Campanelli de Morais; Alexandre Luiz Souto Borges
Journal:  Restor Dent Endod       Date:  2018-11-12

6.  Simulated damage of two implant debridement methods: Nonsurgical approach with Teflon and stainless steel hand scalers.

Authors:  João Paulo Mendes Tribst; Amanda Maria de Oliveira Dal Piva; Dimas Renno de Lima; Alexandre Luiz Souto Borges; Marco Antonio Bottino
Journal:  J Indian Soc Periodontol       Date:  2018 Jul-Aug

7.  Effect of crown to implant ratio and implantoplasty on the fracture resistance of narrow dental implants with marginal bone loss: an in vitro study.

Authors:  Bruno Leitão-Almeida; Octavi Camps-Font; André Correia; Javier Mir-Mari; Rui Figueiredo; Eduard Valmaseda-Castellón
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2020-11-19       Impact factor: 2.757

8.  Does implantoplasty affect the failure strength of narrow and regular diameter implants? A laboratory study.

Authors:  Kristina Bertl; Flemming Isidor; Per Vult von Steyern; Andreas Stavropoulos
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2020-09-07       Impact factor: 3.573

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.