AIMS: Classical microbiology techniques are the gold standard for probiotic enumeration. However, these techniques are limited by parameters of time, specificity and incapacity to detect viable but nonculturable (VBNC) micro-organisms and nonviable cells. The aim of the study was to evaluate flow cytometry as a novel method for the specific quantification of viable and nonviable probiotics in multistrain products. METHODS AND RESULTS: Custom polyclonal antibodies were produced against five probiotic strains from different species (Bifidobacterium bifidum R0071, Bifidobacterium longum ssp. infantis R0033, Bifidobacterium longum ssp. longum R0175, Lactobacillus helveticus R0052 and Lactobacillus rhamnosus R0011). Evaluation of specificity confirmed that all antibodies were specific at least at the subspecies level. A flow cytometry method combining specific antibodies and viability assessment with SYTO® 24 and propidium iodide was applied to quantify these strains in three commercial products. Analyses were conducted on two flow cytometry instruments by two operators and compared with classical microbiology using selective media. Results indicated that flow cytometry provides higher cell counts than classical microbiology (P < 0·05) in 73% of cases highlighting the possible presence of VBNC. Equivalent performances (repeatability and reproducibility) were obtained for both methods. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that flow cytometry methods can be applied to probiotic enumeration and viability assessment. Combination with polyclonal antibodies can achieve sufficient specificity to differentiate closely related strains. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: Flow cytometry provides absolute and specific quantification of viable and nonviable probiotic strains in a very short time (<2 h) compared with classical techniques (>48 h), bringing efficient tools for research and development and quality control.
AIMS: Classical microbiology techniques are the gold standard for probiotic enumeration. However, these techniques are limited by parameters of time, specificity and incapacity to detect viable but nonculturable (VBNC) micro-organisms and nonviable cells. The aim of the study was to evaluate flow cytometry as a novel method for the specific quantification of viable and nonviable probiotics in multistrain products. METHODS AND RESULTS: Custom polyclonal antibodies were produced against five probiotic strains from different species (Bifidobacterium bifidum R0071, Bifidobacterium longum ssp. infantis R0033, Bifidobacterium longum ssp. longum R0175, Lactobacillus helveticus R0052 and Lactobacillus rhamnosus R0011). Evaluation of specificity confirmed that all antibodies were specific at least at the subspecies level. A flow cytometry method combining specific antibodies and viability assessment with SYTO® 24 and propidium iodide was applied to quantify these strains in three commercial products. Analyses were conducted on two flow cytometry instruments by two operators and compared with classical microbiology using selective media. Results indicated that flow cytometry provides higher cell counts than classical microbiology (P < 0·05) in 73% of cases highlighting the possible presence of VBNC. Equivalent performances (repeatability and reproducibility) were obtained for both methods. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that flow cytometry methods can be applied to probiotic enumeration and viability assessment. Combination with polyclonal antibodies can achieve sufficient specificity to differentiate closely related strains. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: Flow cytometry provides absolute and specific quantification of viable and nonviable probiotic strains in a very short time (<2 h) compared with classical techniques (>48 h), bringing efficient tools for research and development and quality control.
Authors: Diego Mora; Rossella Filardi; Stefania Arioli; Sjef Boeren; Steven Aalvink; Willem M de Vos Journal: Microb Biotechnol Date: 2019-08-12 Impact factor: 5.813
Authors: Seppo Salminen; Maria Carmen Collado; Akihito Endo; Colin Hill; Sarah Lebeer; Eamonn M M Quigley; Mary Ellen Sanders; Raanan Shamir; Jonathan R Swann; Hania Szajewska; Gabriel Vinderola Journal: Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol Date: 2021-05-04 Impact factor: 73.082
Authors: Gabriele Andrea Lugli; Giulia Longhi; Giulia Alessandri; Leonardo Mancabelli; Chiara Tarracchini; Federico Fontana; Francesca Turroni; Christian Milani; Francesco Di Pierro; Douwe van Sinderen; Marco Ventura Journal: Front Microbiol Date: 2022-01-21 Impact factor: 5.640
Authors: Chrysi Sergaki; Saba Anwar; Martin Fritzsche; Ryan Mate; Robert J Francis; Kirsty MacLellan-Gibson; Alastair Logan; Gregory C A Amos Journal: Microbiome Date: 2022-08-09 Impact factor: 16.837