Literature DB >> 29236186

Establishment of pathological quantitative method for determining undifferentiated component ratio in patients with differentiated/undifferentiated mixed-type early gastric cancer and clinical significance of this ratio.

Hirohisa Takeuchi1, Nobutsugu Abe2, Yoshikazu Hashimoto2, Atsuko Ooki2, Gen Nagao2, Kazuhiko Hirano3, Yasuo Ookura3, Tadahiko Masaki2, Toshiyuki Mori2, Masanori Sugiyama2.   

Abstract

PURPOSES: The purpose of this study was to establish a pathological quantitative method for determining the undifferentiated components ratio (UCR) in patients with differentiated/undifferentiated mixed-type (Mixed-type) early gastric cancer (EGC) and to examine the clinical significance.
METHODS: The subjects were 410 patients who underwent surgical resection for EGC with the invasion limited to m or sm1. Analysis 1: In 12 randomly selected patients with Mixed-type cancer, we calculated the area ratio and the ratio of the length ratio using ImageJ and analyzed the correlation between them. Analysis 2: We generated ROC curves, and determined the cutoff UCR on the basis of the predictive risk factors for lymph node metastasis (LNM). Analysis 3: We analyzed the relationship between clinicopathological factors including UCR/length of undifferentiated component (LUC = maximum dimensions of tumor × UCR) and LNM.
RESULTS: Analysis 1: The length ratio can be used as a substitute parameter for the UCR (r = 0.996). Analysis 2: The cutoff UCR as a risk factor for LNM was 58% (sensitivity = 1, 1 - specificity = 0.404). Analysis 3: Lymphovascular invasion (p < 0.0001), UCR ≥58% (p = 0.023), and LUC ≥25 mm (p = 0.005) were identified as significant risk factors for LNM. No LNM was observed in patients with invasion limited to m or sm1 and negativity for lymphovascular invasion and UCR <58% (0/215).
CONCLUSIONS: In the patients with Mixed-type EGC, the length ratio of undifferentiated components can be a substitute parameter for the UCR. LNM rarely occurs in patients without lymphovascular invasion and with an UCR <58%. The analysis of the UCR has great significance in determining whether additional surgical resection is required after endoscopic resection.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Early gastric cancer; Mixed-type; Pathological quantitative method

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29236186     DOI: 10.1007/s10120-017-0782-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastric Cancer        ISSN: 1436-3291            Impact factor:   7.370


  10 in total

1.  Index for rating diagnostic tests.

Authors:  W J YOUDEN
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1950-01       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  Risk factors predictive of lymph node metastasis in depressed early gastric cancer.

Authors:  Nobutsugu Abe; Takashi Watanabe; Kazufumi Suzuki; Hiromichi Machida; Hiroshi Toda; Yuzo Nakaya; Tadahiko Masaki; Toshiyuki Mori; Masanori Sugiyama; Yutaka Atomi
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 2.565

3.  Incidence of lymph node metastasis from early gastric cancer: estimation with a large number of cases at two large centers.

Authors:  Takuji Gotoda; Akio Yanagisawa; Mitsuru Sasako; Hiroyuki Ono; Yukihiro Nakanishi; Tadakazu Shimoda; Yo Kato
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 7.370

4.  A phase II clinical trial of endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer of undifferentiated type: Japan Clinical Oncology Group study JCOG1009/1010.

Authors:  Kohei Takizawa; Atsuo Takashima; Aya Kimura; Junki Mizusawa; Noriaki Hasuike; Hiroyuki Ono; Masanori Terashima; Manabu Muto; Narikazu Boku; Mitsuru Sasako; Haruhiko Fukuda
Journal:  Jpn J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-11-19       Impact factor: 3.019

5.  Risk of lymph node metastases from early gastric cancer in relation to depth of invasion: experience in a single institution.

Authors:  Zheng Wang; Li Ma; Xing-Mao Zhang; Zhi-Xiang Zhou
Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev       Date:  2014

6.  NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis.

Authors:  Caroline A Schneider; Wayne S Rasband; Kevin W Eliceiri
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 28.547

7.  Predictive factors for lymph node metastasis of differentiated submucosally invasive gastric cancer.

Authors:  Nobutsugu Abe; Masanori Sugiyama; Tadahiko Masaki; Hisayo Ueki; Osamu Yanagida; Toshiyuki Mori; Takashi Watanabe; Yutaka Atomi
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 9.427

8.  Predictive factors for lymph node metastasis in early gastric cancer with submucosal invasion: analysis of a single institutional experience.

Authors:  Ji Yeong An; Yong Hae Baik; Min Gew Choi; Jae Hyung Noh; Tae Sung Sohn; Sung Kim
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Incidence of lymph node metastasis and the feasibility of endoscopic resection for undifferentiated-type early gastric cancer.

Authors:  Toshiaki Hirasawa; Takuji Gotoda; Satoshi Miyata; You Kato; Tadakazu Shimoda; Hirokazu Taniguchi; Junko Fujisaki; Takeshi Sano; Toshiharu Yamaguchi
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2009-11-05       Impact factor: 7.370

10.  Clinicopathological investigation of early gastric carcinoma; is less invasive surgery right for early gastric carcinoma?

Authors:  Takehiro Okabayashi; Michiya Kobayashi; Takeki Sugimoto; Ken Okamoto; Norihito Hokimoto; Keifiro Araki
Journal:  Hepatogastroenterology       Date:  2007-03
  10 in total
  3 in total

1.  Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection of Early Gastric Cancer with Mixed-Type Histology: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Chang Seok Bang; Young Joo Yang; Jae Jun Lee; Gwang Ho Baik
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2019-07-31       Impact factor: 3.199

2.  Histological Differentiated/Undifferentiated Mixed Type Should Not Be Considered as a Non-Curative Factor of Endoscopic Resection for Patients With Early Gastric Cancer.

Authors:  Xiaolong Tang; Mengjun Zhang; Qingsi He; Guorui Sun; Chao Wang; Peng Gao; Hui Qu
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2020-09-03       Impact factor: 6.244

3.  Relationship between histological mixed-type early gastric cancer and lymph node metastasis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Shufan Yang; Xin Gu; Rui Tao; Jiahui Huo; Zhen Hu; Fei Sun; Jinbin Ni; Xiaoyun Wang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-04-15       Impact factor: 3.752

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.