| Literature DB >> 29236084 |
Yung-Cheng Lin1,2, Shu-Yun Chiang3, Hung-Yi Wu4, Jih-Hui Lin5, Ming-Tang Chiou6,7, Hsin-Fu Liu8,9,10, Chao-Nan Lin11,12.
Abstract
Canine parvovirus type 2c (CPV-2c) emerged in 2000 and is known for causing a more severe disease than other CPV-2 variants in puppies. In 2015, the emerging CPV-2c variant was isolated in Taiwan and it subsequently became the predominant variant. To trace the evolution of Taiwanese CPV-2c, we compared complete VP2 genes of CPV-2c from Taiwan and sequences obtained from GenBank. The evolutionary rate of CPV-2c was estimated to be 4.586 × 10-4 substitutions per site per year (95% highest posterior density (HPD) was 3.284-6.076 × 10-4). The time to the most recent common ancestor (TMRCA) dated to 1990 (95% HPD: 1984-1996) and 2011 (95% HPD: 2010-2013) for the CPV-2c variant and Taiwanese isolates, respectively. The CPV-2c variant isolated from Taiwan was clustered with CPV-2c from China. This phylogenetic clade began to branch off in approximately 2010 (95% HPD was 3.823-6.497). Notably, two unique mutations of Taiwanese CPV-2c were found, Q383R and P410L. In summary, this is the first report on the genome evolution of CPV-2c in Taiwan, revealing that this CPV-2c variant shares a common evolutionary origin with strains from China. The demographic history inferred by the Bayesian skyline plot showed that the effective population of CPV-2c increased until 2006 and then slowly declined until 2011.Entities:
Keywords: Phylodynamic; Time to the most recent common ancestor; canine parvovirus 2c
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29236084 PMCID: PMC5751304 DOI: 10.3390/ijms18122703
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 5.923
Characteristics of the Amino Acid Substitution of CPV-2c Worldwide.
| Country | Year | Amino Acid at Position | Accession Numbers | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5 | 267 | 324 | 370 | 383 | 410 | 440 | |||
| Taiwan | 2015 | A | T | KU244254 | |||||
| 2015 | A | P | T | KX421787 | |||||
| 2015 | Q | P | T | KX421786 | |||||
| 2016 | Q | P | T | KX421788, KX421789 | |||||
| China | 2009 | A | Q | Q | P | T | GU380303 | ||
| 2009 | A | F | Y | Q | Q | P | T | GU380305 | |
| 2014 | Q | P | T | KR611522, KT162005 | |||||
| Argentina | 2008–2009 | A | F | Y | Q | Q | P | T | JF414818–JF414820 |
| 2009–2010 | A | F | Y | Q | Q | P | JF414821–JF414825 | ||
| 2010 | A | F | Y | Q | Q | P | T | JF414826 | |
| Belgium | 2008 | A | F | Y | Q | Q | P | T | FJ005247 |
| Ecuador | 2012 | A | F | Y | Q | Q | P | T | KF149962–KF149965, |
| 2012 | A | F | Y | Q | Q | P | KF149966 | ||
| Germany | 1997–1999 | A | F | Y | Q | Q | P | T | FJ005196–FJ005204 |
| Greece | 2008–2009 | A | F | Y | Q | Q | P | T | GQ865518, GQ865519 |
| Italy | 2000–2010 | A | F | Y | Q | Q | P | T | FJ222821, FJ005195, |
| India | 2014 | A | F | Y | Q | Q | P | T | KP071956 |
| Spain | 2006–2008 | A | F | Y | Q | Q | P | T | FJ005214, FJ005246 |
| Uruguay | 2006–2011 | A | F | Y | Q | Q | P | T | KC196079–KC196093, |
| 2010 | A | F | Y | Q | Q | P | KC196094 | ||
| USA | 2007 | A | F | Y | Q | Q | P | T | FJ005235 |
| 2007 | A | F | Y | Q | Q | P | FJ005236 | ||
| Vietnam | 2004 | A | F | Y | Q | Q | P | T | AB120727 |
Bold represents the amino acid differing from the prototype CPV-2c strain (FJ222821).
Mean Relative Evolutionary Rates for Codon Positions and TMRCA in VP2 gene.
| TMRCA | Substitution Rates Sub/Site/Year (10−4) | Mean Relative Substitution Rate | SE of Mean | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| VP2 gene | 4.586 (3.284~6.076) | |||
| CPV-2 | 1973 (1963–1978) a | |||
| CPV-2c | 1990 (1984–1996) | 6.071 (4.277~8.132) | ||
| CPV-2c Taiwanese strains | 2011 (2010–2013) | |||
| 1st + 2nd codon position | 0.4 (0.302~0.495) | 5.215 × 10−4 | ||
| 3rd codon position | 2.199 (2.011~2.396) | 1.043 × 10−3 |
a ( ) Lower and upper 95% of highest posterior density (HPD).
Figure 1Maximum clade credibility (MCC) tree of CPV-2 inferred from 163 complete VP2 sequences. The MCC tree was constructed with 10% burn-in by Tree Annotator v 1.8 implemented in the BEAST software package. Red text represents the Taiwanese CPV-2c isolate in the present study. Numbers beside the branches are posterior probability values and branch time. Only posterior probability values above 0.95 are shown.
Figure 2Bayesian skyline plot for the complete VP2 gene of the CPV-2. The x-axis is in units of year before 2016 and the y-axis represents the virus effective population size. The thicker bold line represents the median estimate of the effective number of infections over time and the thinner blue lines indicate the upper and lower bounds of the 95% HPD.
Selection Pressure Detected in CPV-2 VP2 Protein Gene.
| Positively Selected Sites | No. of Negatively Selected Sites | Mean dN/dS | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SLAC a | FEL a | FUBA b | SLAC a | FEL a | FUBAR b | ||
| CPV-2 VP2 gene | Non | Non | 426 | 8 | 46 | 31 | 0.108 |
a p value of <0.05. b Posterior probability of ≥0.95.