| Literature DB >> 29234650 |
Jimmy Joseph Meleppuram1, Syed Ibrahim1.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study is to evaluate the clinical and functional outcome in treatment of infected tibial nonunion by the Ilizarov method.Entities:
Keywords: External fixators; Ilizarov technique; Infection; Tibia
Year: 2016 PMID: 29234650 PMCID: PMC5720847 DOI: 10.1016/j.rboe.2016.11.008
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Rev Bras Ortop ISSN: 2255-4971
Non-union – GS Kulkarni's classification.
| Type I | Fragments in apposition with mild infection and with or without implant |
| Type II | Fragments in apposition with severe infection with large or small wound |
| Type III | Severe infection with a gap or deformity or shortening |
Fig. 1Grade 4 pin site infection according to Moore and Dahl classification.
Fig. 2(a) 36 year old male with infected non-union right tibia type IIIc of Kulkarni's classification. (b) Post-op Xray showing radical debridement and preliminary ilizarov ring fixation. (c) X-ray showing post corticotomy status. (d, e) X-ray showing bone transport, (f) fracture united, (g) ilizarov fixator in situ after 8 months of union with excellent union and excellent functional outcome.
Fig. 3(a) A 40 year old male with infected non-union left tibia type IIc of Kulkarni's classification. (b) Immediate post-op X-ray showing radical debridement and preliminary ilizarov ring fixation. (c) 1 month X-ray showing corticotomy done. (d) X-ray showing ongoing bone transport and docking. (e) United fracture with Ilizarov ring removed (f) Ilizarov fixator removed after 7 months of union with excellent union and good functional outcome.
Bony results comparison.
| Results | Excellent | Good | Fair | Poor |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paley | 60.87% | 26.09% | 8.7% | 4.35% |
| Madhusudhan et al. | 22% | 36.34% | 22% | 18.18% |
| Dendrinos et al. | 50% | 29% | 3.6% | 17.4% |
| Lalit et al. | 70% | 10% | 0% | 20% |
| Present study | 60% | 15% | 25% | 0% |
Functional results comparison.
| Results | Excellent | Good | Fair | Poor |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paley | 64% | 28% | 4% | 4% |
| Madhusudhan et al. | 5.56% | 22.22% | 33.33% | 38.89% |
| Dendrinos et al. | 25% | 39.2% | 14.3% | 2.15% |
| Lalit et al. | 26.7% | 40% | 10% | 28.3% |
| Present study | 55% | 30% | 5% | 10% |
Moore and Dahl pin site classification.
| Grade | Inflammation |
|---|---|
| 0 | None or marginal |
| 1 | Marginal inflammation |
| 2 | Inflamed – serous |
| 3 | Inflamed – purulent |
| 4 | Inflamed with induration – seropurulent |
| 5 | Inflamed with induration, tenderness, surrounding erythema – gross purulent |