| Literature DB >> 29234400 |
Shi-Ning Ma1, Zhan-Guo Xie2, Yan Guo3, Jia-Ni Yu4, Juan Lu1, Wei Zhang1, Li-Juan Wang1, Jing Xu1, Rui-Li Zhao1, Shuai Zhou1, Chang-Qing Guo1.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: By observing the needle-knife of KOA rabbit morphology, knee joint cartilage p-FAK, p-PI3K, Aggrecan gene, and protein expression, to study the effect of needle-knife to promote cartilage cell synthesis metabolism mechanism.Entities:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29234400 PMCID: PMC5660818 DOI: 10.1155/2017/4535326
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.629
Figure 1
Figure 2Protein expression stripe of FAK, PI3K, and Aggrecan.
Gene expression of FAK, PI3K, and Aggrecan of KOA rabbit articular cartilages ().
| Group |
| Gene expression of FAK | Gene expression of PI3K | Gene expression of Aggrecan |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Normal | 6 | 1.01 ± 0.19 | 1.02 ± 0.21 | 1.01 ± 0.17 |
| Model | 6 | 1.30 ± 0.10 | 1.22 ± 0.21 | 0.55 ± 0.07 |
| Model-inhibitor | 6 | 1.05 ± 0.08Δ | 1.09 ± 0.08 | 0.38 ± 0.05Δ |
| Needle knife | 6 | 1.57 ± 0.20 | 1.46 ± 0.17 | 0.76 ± 0.07 |
| Needle knife-inhibitor | 6 | 1.25 ± 0.13ΔΔ | 0.98 ± 0.11ΔΔ | 0.51 ± 0.07ΔΔ |
| Electroacupuncture | 6 | 1.47 ± 0.33 | 1.25 ± 0.24 | 0.61 ± 0.06 |
| Electroacupuncture inhibitor | 6 | 1.06 ± 0.10ΔΔ | 0.84 ± 0.12ΔΔ | 0.43 ± 0.08ΔΔ |
Versus normal group: P < 0.05 and P < 0.01; versus model group: P# < 0.05 and P## < 0.01; versus electroacupuncture group: P▲ < 0.05 and P▲▲ < 0.01; versus noninhibitor group: PΔ < 0.05 and PΔΔ < 0.01.
Protein expression of FAK, PI3K, and Aggrecan of KOA rabbit articular cartilages ().
| Group |
| Protein expression of FAK | Protein expression of p-PI3K | Protein expression of Aggrecan |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 6 | 0.06 ± 0.01 | 0.14 ± 0.02 | 1.54 ± 0.16 |
| Model | 6 | 0.45 ± 0.13 | 0.41 ± 0.18 | 0.59 ± 0.11 |
| Model-inhibitor | 6 | 0.15 ± 0.15Δ | 0.22 ± 0.09Δ | 0.19 ± 0.05ΔΔ |
| Needle knife | 6 | 2.32 ± 0.32 | 0.83 ± 0.19 | 1.11 ± 0.16 |
| Needle knife-inhibitor | 6 | 1.95 ± 0.35Δ | 0.65 ± 0.18Δ | 0.69 ± 0.08ΔΔ |
| Electroacupuncture | 6 | 1.25 ± 0.28 | 0.60 ± 0.17 | 0.76 ± 0.14 |
| Electroacupuncture inhibitor | 6 | 0.92 ± 0.23Δ | 0.41 ± 0.15Δ | 0.37 ± 0.13ΔΔ |
Versus normal group: P < 0.01; versus model group: P# < 0.05 and P## < 0.01; versus electroacupuncture group: P▲▲ < 0.01; versus noninhibitor group: PΔ < 0.05 and PΔΔ < 0.01.