| Literature DB >> 24669238 |
Munan Lin1, Xihai Li2, Wenna Liang3, Jianhua Liu1, Jianhong Guo1, Jingxiong Zheng1, Xianxiang Liu2.
Abstract
Knee osteoarthritis (KOA) is a degenerative joint disease that occurs mainly in the elderly population. However, there are currently no effective treatments for treating this condition. In this study, the efficacy of needle-knife therapy, a technique of traditional Chinese medicine that has been widely used to treat KOA was investigated. Patients (n=170) with KOA were randomly divided for needle-knife therapy (treatment group) and acupuncture therapy (control group). Outcome evaluation included stiffness, pain, physiological function, overall changes, total symptom score, clinical curative effects and the concentrations of interleukin (IL)-1β, IL-6 and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) in the synovial fluid. The trial was completed in 151 patients (233 knees) from a total of 170 patients (264 knees); the treatment group comprised 76 patients (117 knees) who completed the trial and 9 patients (14 knees) who were removed from the study, and the control group comprised 75 patients (116 knees) who completed the trial and 10 patients (17 knees) who were removed from the study. The symptom scores of KOA in stages I-IV were reduced significantly in the treatment group and those of stages I-III were decreased significantly in the control group. The effective rate of the KOA therapy in the patients of stages III and IV in the treatment group was significantly higher than that in the control group. After treatment, the decrements of IL-1β, IL-6 and TNF-α in the treatment group were greater than those in the control group. These results showed that the use of needle-knife therapy to treat KOA effectively improved the clinical symptoms by inhibiting the expression of inflammatory cytokines.Entities:
Keywords: acupuncture; knee joint; needle-knife therapy; osteoarthritis
Year: 2014 PMID: 24669238 PMCID: PMC3961116 DOI: 10.3892/etm.2014.1516
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Exp Ther Med ISSN: 1792-0981 Impact factor: 2.447
General characteristics of patients with knee osteoarthritis.
| Group | Cases | Affected knee (cases) | Stage | Gender (cases, M/F) | Age (years) | Course of disease (months) | No. of knees | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||||
| Single | Bilateral | |||||||
| Treatment | 85 | 39 | 46 | I | 9/11 | 52.52±8.63 | 10.76±7.92 | 28 |
| II | 13/10 | 57.66±11.35 | 18.34±11.47 | 35 | ||||
| III | 11/14 | 58.71±10.54 | 24.22±15.24 | 47 | ||||
| IV | 8/9 | 60.43±7.87 | 26.92±10.53 | 21 | ||||
| Control | 85 | 37 | 48 | I | 8/10 | 51.43±9.12 | 11.36±8.41 | 26 |
| II | 12/14 | 55.94±12.67 | 16.94±13.62 | 44 | ||||
| III | 12/13 | 59.36±13.50 | 22.53±17.72 | 43 | ||||
| IV | 9/7 | 61.65±8.92 | 27.83±11.42 | 20 | ||||
Figure 1Needle-knife instruments.
Figure 2Therapeutic process of needle-knife treatment, including selecting acupoints (upper image) and needle-knife insertion (lower image).
Figure 3Comparison of the total symptom scores of KOA. Total symptom scores of KOA (A) prior to treatment in the treatment and control groups, (B) prior to and following treatment in the treatment group and (C) prior to and following treatment in the control group; and (D) decrement of total symptom scores of KOA following treatment in the treatment and control groups. Data are expressed as the means ± SD and the SD is shown as a vertical bar. (B and C) *P<0.05, **P<0.01, compared with the value prior to treatment in the same group; (D) *P<0.05, compared with the decrement of total symptom scores in the control group. KOA, knee osteoarthritis; SD, standard deviation.
Comparison of clinical effectiveness.
| Group | Cases | Stage | No. of knee | Grade of effectiveness (no. of knee) | Excellent rate (%) | Effective rate (%) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||||||
| Excellent | Good | Moderate | Bad | ||||||
| Treatment | 76 | I | 26 | 5 | 12 | 6 | 3 | 65.38 | 88.46 |
| II | 32 | 3 | 12 | 11 | 6 | 46.88 | 81.25 | ||
| III | 42 | 0 | 7 | 26 | 9 | 16.67 | 78.57 | ||
| IV | 17 | 0 | 1 | 10 | 6 | 5.88 | 64.71 | ||
| Control | 75 | I | 23 | 3 | 11 | 7 | 2 | 60.87 | 91.30 |
| II | 38 | 2 | 15 | 13 | 8 | 44.74 | 78.95 | ||
| III | 38 | 0 | 4 | 19 | 15 | 10.53 | 60.53 | ||
| IV | 17 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 10 | 5.88 | 41.18 | ||
P<0.05, compared with the effective rate in the control group.
Figure 4IL-1β concentrations in the synovial fluid. IL-1β concentrations in patients with KOA (A) prior to treatment in the treatment and control groups; (B) prior to and following treatment in the treatment group and (C) prior to and following treatment in the control group; and (D) decrement of IL-1β concentrations following treatment in the treatment and control groups. Data are expressed as the means ± SD and the SD is shown as a vertical bar. *P<0.05, compared with thedecrement of IL-1β in the control group. IL, interleukin; KOA, knee osteoarthritis; SD, standard deviation.
Figure 6TNF-α concentrations in the synovial fluid. TNF-α concentrations in patients with KOA (A) prior to treatment in the treatment and control groups; (B) prior to and following treatment in the treatment group and (C) prior to and following treatment in the control group; and (D) decrement of TNF-α concentrations following treatment in the treatment and control groups. Data are expressed as the means ± SD and the SD is shown as a vertical bar. (B and C) *P<0.05, **P<0.01, compared with prior to treatment in the same group; (D) *P<0.05, compared with the decrement of TNF-α in the control group. IL, interleukin; KOA, knee osteoarthritis; SD, standard deviation.