| Literature DB >> 29234388 |
Rayile Aisa1,2, Zhaoxia Yu1, Xiangyang Zhang1, Dilinuer Maimaitiyiming1, Lipeng Huang1, Ayshamgul Hasim3, Tao Jiang4, Mingjun Duan4.
Abstract
AIMS: The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of the aqueous extract of Nardostachys chinensis Batalin (NCBAE) on blood pressure and cardiac hypertrophy using two-kidney one-clip (2K1C) hypertensive rats.Entities:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29234388 PMCID: PMC5660807 DOI: 10.1155/2017/4031950
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.629
Figure 1Identification of linarin (a) and β-sitosterol (b) in NCBAE by UPLC-MS method.
Figure 2Development of SBP in the six experimental groups during a 12-week period. Thirteen time points of SBP were measured in each group. Data are expressed as the mean ± SD. n = 12. P < 0.01 compared with sham-operated group. #P < 0.01 compared with 2K1C group. ##P < 0.05 compared with 2K1C group.
Figure 3Representative echocardiography for each group.
The echocardiographic parameters in each group.
| Group | Sham | 2K1C | 2K1C + Ator | 2K1C + NCBAE (H) | 2K1C + NCBAE (M) | 2K1C + NCBAE (L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LVPWd (mm) | 1.55 ± 0.24 | 1.72 ± 0.28 | 1.68 ± 0.10 | 1.57 ± 0.14# | 1.76 ± 0.16 | 1.74 ± 0.14 |
| LVPWs (mm) | 2.52 ± 0.31 | 2.78 ± 0.16 | 2.68 ± 0.10 | 2.55 ± 0.18# | 2.82 ± 0.10 | 2.86 ± 0.10 |
| LVIDd (mm) | 6.62 ± 0.52 | 5.83 ± 0.39 | 5.81 ± 0.68 | 5.97 ± 0.58 | 5.87 ± 0.56 | 5.82 ± 0.51 |
| LVIDs (mm) | 4.03 ± 0.44 | 3.85 ± 0.48 | 3.82 ± 0.40 | 3.86 ± 0.47 | 3.83 ± 0.34 | 3.82 ± 0.43 |
| IVSd (mm) | 1.44 ± 0.23 | 1.89 ± 0.28 | 1.52 ± 0.11# | 1.56 ± 0.09# | 1.74 ± 0.16 | 1.75 ± 0.08 |
| IVSs (mm) | 2.51 ± 0.31 | 2.92 ± 0.29 | 2.83 ± 0.32 | 2.63 ± 0.20# | 2.89 ± 0.25 | 2.84 ± 0.28 |
| LVEF (%) | 70.20 ± 5.05 | 59.71 ± 7.65 | 62.65 ± 4.38 | 68.74 ± 7.63# | 59.99 ± 6.88 | 58.68 ± 8.05 |
| LVFS (%) | 39.17 ± 3.73 | 33.89 ± 6.81 | 33.98 ± 5.22 | 35.19 ± 5.56 | 34.37 ± 6.27 | 34.31 ± 4.62 |
LVPWd: left ventricular posterior wall at end diastole; LVPWs: left ventricular posterior wall at end systole; LVIDd: left ventricular internal diameter at end diastole; LVIDs: left ventricular internal diameter at end systole; IVSd: interventricular septal diameter at end diastole; IVSs: interventricular septal diameter at end systole; LVEF: left ventricular ejection fraction; LVFS: left ventricular fractional shortening. All values are mean ± SD. P < 0.05 compared with sham-operation group. #P < 0.05 compared with 2K1C group.
BW, LVW, and LVW/BW in each group.
| Group | LVW (mg) | BW (g) | LVW/BW (mg/g) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sham ( | 750.00 ± 26.29 | 366.25 ± 13.96 | 2.05 ± 0.08 |
| 2K1C ( | 946.67 ± 32.00 | 365.58 ± 4.87 | 2.59 ± 0.09 |
| 2K1C + Ator ( | 918.33 ± 28.55 | 368.92 ± 4.17 | 2.49 ± 0.06 |
| 2K1C + NCBAE (H) ( | 898.33 ± 41.30 | 365.33 ± 8.75 | 2.46 ± 0.11 |
| 2K1C + NCBAE (M) ( | 943.33 ± 20.60 | 370.42 ± 9.52 | 2.55 ± 0.10 |
| 2K1C + NCBAE (L) ( | 944.17 ± 31.47 | 365.75 ± 7.39 | 2.58 ± 0.10 |
LVW: left ventricular weight; BW: body weight; LVW/BW: left ventricular weight to body weight ratio. All values are mean ± SD. P < 0.01 compared with sham-operation group. #P < 0.01 compared with 2K1C group. ##P < 0.05 compared with 2K1C group.
Figure 4Effects of NCBAE on cardiac hypertrophy (representative pictures of myocardium stained with H&E, magnification: 400x).
Figure 5Quantitative analysis of cardiomyocyte CSA for samples of each group. Computer-based image analysis was applied for measurements. P < 0.01 compared with sham-operated group. #P < 0.01 compared with 2K1C group.
Figure 6Inhibitory effects of treatment with NCBAE on 2K1C-induced reduction in serum NO and elevation of serum LDH in rats. P < 0.01 compared with sham-operated group. #P < 0.01 compared with 2K1C group.
Figure 7Effects of NCBAE on 2K1C-induced apoptosis. (a) The expression of Bcl-2 and cleaved caspase-3 protein was determined by western blotting. (b) Protein levels were measured by densitometry and presented as histograms. Bcl-2 and cleaved caspase-3 protein normalized to β-actin. P < 0.01 compared with sham-operation group. P < 0.05 compared with sham-operation group. #P < 0.01 compared with 2K1C group.