J Caradeux1, R J Martinez-Portilla2, T R Basuki3, T Kiserud4, F Figueras5. 1. Fetal i+D Fetal Medicine Research Center, BCNatal-Barcelona Center for Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine (Hospital Clínic and Hospital Sant Joan de Déu), IDIBAPS, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; Fetal Medicine Unit, Clínica Dávila, Santiago, Chile. 2. Fetal i+D Fetal Medicine Research Center, BCNatal-Barcelona Center for Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine (Hospital Clínic and Hospital Sant Joan de Déu), IDIBAPS, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; Fetal Medicine Unit, Clínica Hospital Sinaí, Xalapa Veracruz, México. 3. Fetal i+D Fetal Medicine Research Center, BCNatal-Barcelona Center for Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine (Hospital Clínic and Hospital Sant Joan de Déu), IDIBAPS, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain. 4. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway; Research Group for Pregnancy, Fetal Development, and Birth, Department of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway. 5. Fetal i+D Fetal Medicine Research Center, BCNatal-Barcelona Center for Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine (Hospital Clínic and Hospital Sant Joan de Déu), IDIBAPS, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; Center for Biomedical Research on Rare Diseases (CIBER-ER), Madrid, Spain. Electronic address: ffiguera@clinic.ub.es.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to establish the risk of fetal death in early-onset growth-restricted fetuses with absent or reversed end-diastolic velocities in the umbilical artery or ductus venosus. DATA SOURCES: A systematic search was performed to identify relevant studies published in English, Spanish, French, Italian, or German using the databases PubMed, ISI Web of Science, and SCOPUS, without publication time restrictions. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: The study criteria included observational cohort studies and randomized controlled trials of early-onset growth-restricted fetuses (diagnosed before 34 weeks of gestation), with information on the rate of fetal death occurring before 34 weeks of gestation and absent or reversed end-diastolic velocities in the umbilical artery and/or ductus venosus. STUDY APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS METHODS: For quality assessment, 2 reviewers independently assessed the risk of bias using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for observational studies and the Cochrane Collaboration's tool for randomized trials. For the meta-analysis, odds ratio for both fixed and random-effects models (weighting by inverse of variance) were used. Heterogeneity between studies was assessed using tau2, χ2 (Cochrane Q), and I2 statistics. Publication bias was assessed by a funnel plot for meta-analyses and quantified by the Egger method. RESULTS: A total of 31 studies were included in this meta-analysis. The odds ratios for fetal death (random-effects models) were 3.59 (95% confidence interval, 2.3-5.6), 7.27 (95% confidence interval, 4.6-11.4), and 11.6 (95% confidence interval, 6.3-19.7) for growth-restricted fetuses with umbilical artery absent end-diastolic velocities, umbilical artery reversed end-diastolic velocities, and ductus venosus absent or reversed end-diastolic velocities, respectively. There was no substantial heterogeneity among studies for any of the analyses. CONCLUSION: Early-onset growth-restricted fetuses with either umbilical artery or ductus venosus absent or reserved end-diastolic velocities are at a substantially increased risk for fetal death.
OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to establish the risk of fetal death in early-onset growth-restricted fetuses with absent or reversed end-diastolic velocities in the umbilical artery or ductus venosus. DATA SOURCES: A systematic search was performed to identify relevant studies published in English, Spanish, French, Italian, or German using the databases PubMed, ISI Web of Science, and SCOPUS, without publication time restrictions. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: The study criteria included observational cohort studies and randomized controlled trials of early-onset growth-restricted fetuses (diagnosed before 34 weeks of gestation), with information on the rate of fetal death occurring before 34 weeks of gestation and absent or reversed end-diastolic velocities in the umbilical artery and/or ductus venosus. STUDY APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS METHODS: For quality assessment, 2 reviewers independently assessed the risk of bias using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for observational studies and the Cochrane Collaboration's tool for randomized trials. For the meta-analysis, odds ratio for both fixed and random-effects models (weighting by inverse of variance) were used. Heterogeneity between studies was assessed using tau2, χ2 (Cochrane Q), and I2 statistics. Publication bias was assessed by a funnel plot for meta-analyses and quantified by the Egger method. RESULTS: A total of 31 studies were included in this meta-analysis. The odds ratios for fetal death (random-effects models) were 3.59 (95% confidence interval, 2.3-5.6), 7.27 (95% confidence interval, 4.6-11.4), and 11.6 (95% confidence interval, 6.3-19.7) for growth-restricted fetuses with umbilical artery absent end-diastolic velocities, umbilical artery reversed end-diastolic velocities, and ductus venosus absent or reversed end-diastolic velocities, respectively. There was no substantial heterogeneity among studies for any of the analyses. CONCLUSION: Early-onset growth-restricted fetuses with either umbilical artery or ductus venosus absent or reserved end-diastolic velocities are at a substantially increased risk for fetal death.
Authors: Nir Melamed; Ahmet Baschat; Yoav Yinon; Apostolos Athanasiadis; Federico Mecacci; Francesc Figueras; Vincenzo Berghella; Amala Nazareth; Muna Tahlak; H David McIntyre; Fabrício Da Silva Costa; Anne B Kihara; Eran Hadar; Fionnuala McAuliffe; Mark Hanson; Ronald C Ma; Rachel Gooden; Eyal Sheiner; Anil Kapur; Hema Divakar; Diogo Ayres-de-Campos; Liran Hiersch; Liona C Poon; John Kingdom; Roberto Romero; Moshe Hod Journal: Int J Gynaecol Obstet Date: 2021-03 Impact factor: 3.561
Authors: Natalie J Hannan; Owen Stock; Rebecca Spencer; Clare Whitehead; Anna L David; Katie Groom; Scott Petersen; Amanda Henry; Joanne M Said; Sean Seeho; Stefan C Kane; Lavinia Gordon; Sally Beard; Kantaraja Chindera; Smita Karegodar; Richard Hiscock; Natasha Pritchard; Tu'uhevaha J Kaitu'u-Lino; Susan P Walker; Stephen Tong Journal: BMC Med Date: 2020-05-22 Impact factor: 8.775
Authors: Victoria J King; Laura Bennet; Peter R Stone; Alys Clark; Alistair J Gunn; Simerdeep K Dhillon Journal: Front Physiol Date: 2022-08-19 Impact factor: 4.755
Authors: Jezid Miranda; Rui V Simões; Cristina Paules; Daniel Cañueto; Miguel A Pardo-Cea; María L García-Martín; Francesca Crovetto; Rocio Fuertes-Martin; Monica Domenech; María D Gómez-Roig; Elisenda Eixarch; Ramon Estruch; Stefan R Hansson; Nuria Amigó; Nicolau Cañellas; Fatima Crispi; Eduard Gratacós Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2018-09-11 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Natasha de Alwis; Sally Beard; Natalie K Binder; Natasha Pritchard; Tu'uhevaha J Kaitu'u-Lino; Susan P Walker; Owen Stock; Katie Groom; Scott Petersen; Amanda Henry; Joanne M Said; Sean Seeho; Stefan C Kane; Lisa Hui; Stephen Tong; Natalie J Hannan Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2021-03-10 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: S Sammallahti; H Tiemeier; S Louwen; E Steegers; M Hillegers; V W V Jaddoe; T White Journal: Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol Date: 2021-08 Impact factor: 7.299