| Literature DB >> 29232912 |
Peng Kang1, Yipeng Lv2, Qiangyu Deng3, Yuan Liu4, Yi Zhang5, Xu Liu6, Lulu Zhang7.
Abstract
Research concerning the impact of earthquake victims' individual behavior and its association with earthquake-related injuries is lacking. This study examined this relationship along with effectiveness of earthquake rescue measures. The six most severely destroyed townships during the Lushan earthquake were examined; 28 villages and three earthquake victims' settlement camp areas were selected as research areas. Inclusion criteria comprised living in Lushan county for a longtime, living in Lushan county during the 2013 Lushan earthquake, and having one's home destroyed. Earthquake victims with an intellectual disability or communication problems were excluded. The earthquake victims (N (number) = 5165, male = 2396) completed a questionnaire (response rate: 94.7%). Among them, 209 were injured (5.61%). Teachers (p < 0.0001, OR (odds ratios) = 3.33) and medical staff (p = 0.001, OR = 4.35) were more vulnerable to the earthquake than were farmers. Individual behavior was directly related to injuries, such as the first reaction after earthquake and fear. There is an obvious connection between earthquake-related injury and individual behavior characteristics. It is strongly suggested that victims receive mental health support from medical practitioners and the government to minimize negative effects. The initial reaction after an earthquake also played a vital role in victims' trauma; therefore, earthquake-related experience and education may prevent injuries. Self-aid and mutual help played key roles in emergency, medical rescue efforts.Entities:
Keywords: earthquake victims; individual behavior; injury; rescue efforts
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29232912 PMCID: PMC5750974 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph14121556
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
The demographic factors of Lushan earthquake victims after matching with geographic location factors.
| Without Injury (4875) | Injured (290) | Odds Ratios (OR) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number (N) | % | N | % | OR | 95% CI | ||||
| 15–35 | 1101 | 22.58 | 84 | 28.97 | 1.00 | ||||
| 35–65 | 3377 | 69.27 | 153 | 52.76 | 0.86 | 0.61 | 1.22 | 0.396 | |
| >65 | 397 | 8.14 | 53 | 18.28 | 2.01 | 1.27 | 3.18 | 0.003 | |
| Male | 2396 | 49.15 | 137 | 47.24 | 1.00 | ||||
| Female | 2479 | 50.85 | 153 | 52.76 | 1.01 | 0.79 | 1.30 | 0.914 | |
| Above high school | 813 | 16.68 | 77 | 26.55 | 1.00 | ||||
| Junior high school | 2518 | 51.65 | 131 | 45.17 | 1.01 | 0.70 | 1.44 | 0.972 | |
| Below primary school | 1544 | 31.67 | 82 | 28.28 | 0.67 | 0.45 | 1.01 | 0.055 | |
| Farmer | 4083 | 83.75 | 202 | 69.66 | 1.00 | ||||
| Teacher | 73 | 1.50 | 20 | 6.90 | 3.33 | 1.81 | 6.13 | 0.000 | |
| Government officer | 48 | 0.98 | 1 | 0.34 | 0.42 | 0.06 | 3.14 | 0.398 | |
| Worker | 218 | 4.47 | 13 | 4.48 | 1.01 | 0.55 | 1.88 | 0.966 | |
| Medical staff | 32 | 0.66 | 10 | 3.45 | 4.35 | 1.88 | 10.08 | 0.001 | |
| Student | 242 | 4.96 | 24 | 8.28 | 1.75 | 0.99 | 3.09 | 0.056 | |
| Business man | 106 | 2.17 | 7 | 2.41 | 1.32 | 0.58 | 3.04 | 0.510 | |
| Others | 73 | 1.50 | 13 | 4.48 | 1.85 | 0.94 | 3.67 | 0.077 | |
| Single | 764 | 15.67 | 67 | 23.10 | 1.00 | ||||
| Married | 4111 | 84.33 | 223 | 76.90 | 0.90 | 0.63 | 1.28 | 0.549 | |
Newton-Raphson ridge method was used for parameter optimization and evaluation. The model is matched with geographic factors, the township location. The fitness of the model was evaluated by likelihood ratio test. * p < 0.05.
Personal behavioral characteristics with injury situation.
| All | Not Injured | Injured | OR | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N (%) | N (%) | N (%) | OR | 95% CI | ||||
| Suffered from the Wenchuan earthquake or not * | ||||||||
| Yes | 4877 (94.42) | 4621 (94.79) | 256 (88.28) | 1.00 | ||||
| No | 288 (5.58) | 254 (5.21) | 34 (11.72) | 2.11 | 1.41 | 3.17 | 0.000 | |
| Got injured during the earthquake or not * | ||||||||
| Yes | 195 (3.78) | 167 (3.43) | 28 (9.66) | 1.00 | ||||
| No | 4970 (96.22) | 4708 (96.57) | 262 (90.34) | 0.34 | 0.22 | 0.53 | <0.0001 | |
| Received earthquake evacuation training before the earthquake happened or not * | ||||||||
| Yes | 3153 (61.05) | 3015 (61.85) | 138 (47.59) | 1.00 | ||||
| No | 2012 (38.95) | 1860 (38.15) | 152 (52.41) | 1.62 | 1.21 | 2.16 | 0.001 | |
| Fear level a (increase from 1 to 5) * | ||||||||
| 1 | 414 (8.02) | 399 (8.18) | 15 (5.17) | 1.00 | ||||
| 2 | 332 (6.43) | 322 (6.61) | 10 (3.45) | 0.80 | 0.35 | 1.84 | 0.601 | |
| 3 | 598 (11.58) | 579 (11.88) | 19 (6.55) | 0.87 | 0.43 | 1.76 | 0.703 | |
| 4 | 900 (17.42) | 851 (17.46) | 49 (16.9) | 1.65 | 0.90 | 3.03 | 0.105 | |
| 5 | 2639 (51.09) | 2454 (50.34) | 185 (63.79) | 1.93 | 1.11 | 3.35 | 0.020 | |
| Forget | 282 (5.46) | 270 (5.54) | 12 (4.14) | 1.16 | 0.52 | 2.57 | 0.715 | |
| First reaction during the earthquake * | ||||||||
| Maintain in the same place | 1048 (20.29) | 1001 (20.53) | 47 (16.21) | 1.00 | ||||
| Sit down | 123 (2.38) | 116 (2.38) | 7 (2.41) | 1.14 | 0.50 | 2.63 | 0.752 | |
| Stand up | 367 (7.11) | 336 (6.89) | 31 (10.69) | 1.96 | 1.21 | 3.17 | 0.006 | |
| Hidden under the desk or furniture | 418 (8.09) | 394 (8.08)) | 24 (8.28) | 1.23 | 0.73 | 2.06 | 0.439 | |
| Run out but trapped | 329 (6.37) | 267 (5.48) | 62 (21.38) | 4.19 | 2.76 | 6.36 | <0.0001 | |
| Run out of the building | 2694 (52.16) | 2576 (52.84) | 118 (40.69) | 0.95 | 0.66 | 1.35 | 0.754 | |
| Others | 186 (3.60) | 185 (3.79) | 1 (0.34) | 0.11 | 0.02 | 0.82 | 0.031 | |
| Trapped after the earthquake or not * | ||||||||
| Yes | 2073 (40.14 | 1869 (38.34) | 204 (70.34) | 2.50 | 1.87 | 3.34 | <0.0001 | |
| No | 3092 (59.86) | 3006 (61.66) | 86 (29.66) | 1.00 | ||||
| Family members got trapped or not * | ||||||||
| Yes | 540 (10.45) | 390 (8.00) | 150 (51.72) | 13.62 | 10.12 | 18.31 | <0.0001 | |
| No | 4625 (89.55) | 4485 (92.00) | 140 (48.28) | 1.00 | ||||
* The model is matched with geographic factors, the township location. The fitness of the model evaluated by likelihood ratio test. * p < 0.05. a Fear ranges from levels 1 to 5. Level 1 means not feeling terrified at all while Level 5 means feeling extremely terrified.
Figure 1The time at which victims got injured.
Figure 2Ways of getting out of the collapsed building.
Figure 3Time taken to get out of the collapsed building (hours).
Figure 4Source of medical care in the site.