Literature DB >> 16602260

Surviving collapsed structure entrapment after earthquakes: a "time-to-rescue" analysis.

Anthony G Macintyre1, Joseph A Barbera, Edward R Smith.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Massive earthquakes often cause structures to collapse, trapping victims under dense rubble for long periods of time. Commonly, this spurs resource intensive, dangerous, and frustrating attempts to find and extricate live victims. The search and rescue phase usually is maintained for many days beyond the last "save," potentially diverting critical attention and resources away from the pressing needs of non-trapped survivors and the devastated community. This recurring phenomenon is driven by the often-unanswered question "Can anyone still be alive under there?" The maximum survival time in entrapment is an important issue for responders, yet little formal research has been conducted on this issue. Knowing the maximum survival time in entrapment helps responders: (1) decide whether or not they should continue to assign limited resources to search and rescue activities; (2) assess the safety risks versus the benefits; (3) determine when search and rescue activities no longer are indicated; and (4) time and pace the important transition to community recovery efforts.
METHODS: The time period of 1985-2004 was selected for investigation. Medline and Lexis-Nexis databases were searched for earthquake events that occurred within this timeframe. Medical literature articles providing time-torescue data for victims of earthquakes were identified. Lexis-Nexis reports were scanned to select those with time-to-rescue data for victims of earthquakes. Reports from both databases were examined for information that might contribute to prolonged survival of entrapped individuals.
RESULTS: A total of 34 different earthquake events met study criteria. Forty-eight medical articles containing time-to-rescue data were identified. Of these, the longest time to rescue was "13-19 days" post-event (secondhand data and the author is not specific). The second longest time to rescue in the medical articles was 8.7 days (209 hours). Twenty-five medical articles report multiple rescues that occurred after two days (48 hours). Media reports describe rescues occurring beyond Day 2 in 18 of 34 earthquakes. Of these, the longest reliably reported survival is 14 days after impact, with the next closest having survived 13 days. The average maximum times reported from these 18 earthquakes was 6.8 days (median = 5.75 days). The event with the most media reports of distinct rescue events was the 1999 Marmara, Turkey earthquake (43 victims). Times range from 0.5 days (12 hours) to 6.2 days (146 hours) for this event. Both databases provide little formal data to develop detailed insight into factors affecting survivability during entrapment.
CONCLUSIONS: A thorough search of the English-language medical literature and media accounts provides a provocative picture of numerous survivors beyond 48 hours of entrapment under rubble, with a few successfully enduring entrapment of 13-14 days. These data are not necessarily applicable to non-earthquake collapsed-structure events. For incident managers and their medical advisors, the study findings and discussion may be useful for post-impact decision-making and in establishing and/or revising incident priorities as the response evolves.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16602260     DOI: 10.1017/s1049023x00003253

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prehosp Disaster Med        ISSN: 1049-023X            Impact factor:   2.040


  5 in total

1.  Facilitators and obstacles in pre-hospital medical response to earthquakes: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Ahmadreza Djalali; Hamidreza Khankeh; Gunnar Öhlén; Maaret Castrén; Lisa Kurland
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2011-05-16       Impact factor: 2.953

2.  A 2-year follow-up survey of 523 cases with peripheral nerve injuries caused by the earthquake in Wenchuan, China.

Authors:  Chun-Qing He; Li-Hai Zhang; Xian-Fei Liu; Pei-Fu Tang
Journal:  Neural Regen Res       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 5.135

3.  Investigating Lushan Earthquake Victims' Individual Behavior Response and Rescue Organization.

Authors:  Peng Kang; Yipeng Lv; Qiangyu Deng; Yuan Liu; Yi Zhang; Xu Liu; Lulu Zhang
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2017-12-11       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 4.  Search without rescue? Evaluating the international search and rescue response to earthquake disasters.

Authors:  Anna Rom; Ilan Kelman
Journal:  BMJ Glob Health       Date:  2020-12

5.  Mortality in the l'aquila (central Italy) earthquake of 6 april 2009.

Authors:  David Alexander; Michele Magni
Journal:  PLoS Curr       Date:  2013-01-07
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.