Literature DB >> 29231794

Intracranial contrast transit times on digital subtraction angiography decrease more in patients with delayed intraparenchymal hemorrhage after Pipeline.

Denise Brunozzi1, Sophia F Shakur1, Fady T Charbel1, Ali Alaraj1.   

Abstract

Background Pipeline embolization devices (PEDs) are used for endovascular treatment of cerebral aneurysms but can be associated with delayed ipsilateral intraparenchymal hemorrhage (DIPH). Changes in intracranial hemodynamics after PED are poorly understood. Objective Here, we assess hemodynamic changes after PED in patients and compare these changes in patients with and without DIPH (DIPH+ and DIPH-). Methods Records of patients with distal internal carotid artery (ICA) aneurysms treated with PED at our institution between 2012 and 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. Regions of interest were selected proximally to PED over the cavernous ICA and distally over the middle cerebral artery (MCA), and then transit times were determined using syngo iFlow software (Siemens). Ratio of MCA to ICA transit time was compared before, after treatment, and at follow-up. Ratios were also compared between DIPH+ and DIPH- subgroups. Correlations between aneurysm size, age, and ratios were investigated. Results Fifty-three patients were included. The ratio of MCA to ICA transit time decreased significantly after PED deployment (1.13 vs. 1.22, p < 0.01). The ratio in the DIPH + subgroup ( n = 4) was significantly lower (1.00 vs. 1.14, p = 0.01) and decreased significantly more (21% vs. 4.4%, p = 0.02) compared to the DIPH- subgroup ( n = 49). The ratio tended to be higher in larger aneurysms at baseline ( r = 0.25, p = 0.07) but not after PED treatment ( r = 0.11, p = 0.15). Age did not correlate with ratio. Conclusion The ratio of MCA to ICA transit time decreases following PED treatment and decreases more in patients with DIPH. These contrast transit time changes can be detected in real time immediately after PED deployment.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Autoregulation; Pipeline embolization device; cerebral aneurysm; flow diversion; hemodynamics; hemorrhage; transit time

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29231794      PMCID: PMC5847013          DOI: 10.1177/1591019917747248

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol        ISSN: 1591-0199            Impact factor:   1.610


  23 in total

1.  Delayed ipsilateral parenchymal hemorrhage following flow diversion for the treatment of anterior circulation aneurysms.

Authors:  J P Cruz; M Chow; C O'Kelly; B Marotta; J Spears; W Montanera; D Fiorella; T Marotta
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2012-03-08       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  A method for rapid in vivo measurement of blood T1.

Authors:  Marta Varela; Joseph V Hajnal; Esben T Petersen; Xavier Golay; Nazakat Merchant; David J Larkman
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 4.044

3.  MRI evidence of reperfusion injury associated with neurological deficits after carotid revascularization procedures.

Authors:  A-H Cho; D-C Suh; G E Kim; J S Kim; D H Lee; S U Kwon; S M Park; D-W Kang
Journal:  Eur J Neurol       Date:  2009-05-22       Impact factor: 6.089

4.  Effect of age and vascular anatomy on blood flow in major cerebral vessels.

Authors:  Sepideh Amin-Hanjani; Xinjian Du; Dilip K Pandey; Keith R Thulborn; Fady T Charbel
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2014-11-12       Impact factor: 6.200

5.  Changes in contrast transit times on digital subtraction angiography post-Pipeline Embolization Device deployment.

Authors:  Ahmed E Hussein; Andreas Linninger; Sophia F Shakur; Fady T Charbel; Chih-Yang Hsu; Fady T Charbel; Ali Alaraj
Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol       Date:  2017-01-17       Impact factor: 1.610

6.  Quantitative assessment of parent vessel and distal intracranial hemodynamics following pipeline flow diversion.

Authors:  Sophia F Shakur; Victor A Aletich; Sepideh Amin-Hanjani; Ahmed E Hussein; Fady T Charbel; Ali Alaraj
Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol       Date:  2016-10-04       Impact factor: 1.610

7.  Quantitative flow measurement after placing a flow diverter for a distal internal carotid artery aneurysm.

Authors:  Chien-Wei Chen; Ho-Fai Wong; Yu-Ling Ye; Yao-Liang Chen; Wei-Liang Chen; Chang-Hsien Ou; Yuan-Hsiung Tsai
Journal:  J Neurointerv Surg       Date:  2016-12-08       Impact factor: 5.836

Review 8.  Endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms with flow diverters: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Waleed Brinjikji; Mohammad H Murad; Giuseppe Lanzino; Harry J Cloft; David F Kallmes
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2013-01-15       Impact factor: 7.914

9.  Cerebral hyperperfusion after flow diversion of large intracranial aneurysms.

Authors:  Albert Ho Yuen Chiu; Jason Wenderoth
Journal:  J Neurointerv Surg       Date:  2012-11-27       Impact factor: 5.836

10.  Pipeline embolization device (PED) for neurovascular reconstruction: initial experience in the treatment of 101 intracranial aneurysms and dissections.

Authors:  Sebastian Fischer; Zsolt Vajda; Marta Aguilar Perez; Elisabeth Schmid; Nikolai Hopf; Hansjörg Bäzner; Hans Henkes
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2011-09-01       Impact factor: 2.804

View more
  1 in total

1.  2D parametric contrast time-density analysis for the prediction of complete aneurysm occlusion at six months' post-flow diversion stent.

Authors:  Ahmed E Hussein; Meghana Shownkeen; Andre Thomas; Christopher Stapleton; Denise Brunozzi; Jessica Nelson; John Naumgart; Andreas Linninger; Gursant Atwal; Ali Alaraj
Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol       Date:  2020-02-26       Impact factor: 1.610

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.