Francesca Lami1,2, Kristine Egberts1, Alexandra Ure1,2, Rowena Conroy2,3,4, Katrina Williams1,2,3. 1. Department of Paediatrics, Faculty of MDHS, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. 2. Developmental Disability and Rehabilitation Research, Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. 3. Neurodevelopment and Disability, The Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. 4. School of Psychological Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Abstract
AIM: To systematically review the measurement properties of instruments assessing participation in young people with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). METHOD: A search was performed in MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and PubMed combining three constructs ('ASD', 'test of participation', 'measurement properties'). Results were restricted to articles including people aged 6 to 29 years. The 2539 identified articles were independently screened by two reviewers. For the included articles, data were extracted using standard forms and their risk of bias was assessed. RESULTS: Nine studies (8 cross-sectional) met the inclusion criteria, providing information on seven different instruments. The total sample included 634 participants, with sex available for 600 (males=494; females=106) and age available for 570, with mean age for these participants 140.58 months (SD=9.11; range=36-624). Included instruments were the school function assessment, vocational index, children's assessment of participation and enjoyment/preferences for activities of children, experience sampling method, Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory, Computer Adaptive Test, adolescent and young adult activity card sort, and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System parent-proxy peer relationships. Seven studies assessed reliability and validity; good properties were reported for half of the instruments considered. Most studies (n=6) had high risk of bias. Overall the quality of the evidence for each tool was limited. INTERPRETATION: Validation of these instruments, or others that comprehensively assess participation, is needed. Future studies should follow recommended methodological standards. WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS: Seven instruments have been used to assess participation in young people with autism. One instrument, with excellent measurement properties in one study, does not comprehensively assess participation. Studies of three instruments that incorporate a more comprehensive assessment of participation have methodological limitations. Overall, limited evidence exists regarding measurement properties of participation assessments for young people with autism.
AIM: To systematically review the measurement properties of instruments assessing participation in young people with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). METHOD: A search was performed in MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and PubMed combining three constructs ('ASD', 'test of participation', 'measurement properties'). Results were restricted to articles including people aged 6 to 29 years. The 2539 identified articles were independently screened by two reviewers. For the included articles, data were extracted using standard forms and their risk of bias was assessed. RESULTS: Nine studies (8 cross-sectional) met the inclusion criteria, providing information on seven different instruments. The total sample included 634 participants, with sex available for 600 (males=494; females=106) and age available for 570, with mean age for these participants 140.58 months (SD=9.11; range=36-624). Included instruments were the school function assessment, vocational index, children's assessment of participation and enjoyment/preferences for activities of children, experience sampling method, Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory, Computer Adaptive Test, adolescent and young adult activity card sort, and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System parent-proxy peer relationships. Seven studies assessed reliability and validity; good properties were reported for half of the instruments considered. Most studies (n=6) had high risk of bias. Overall the quality of the evidence for each tool was limited. INTERPRETATION: Validation of these instruments, or others that comprehensively assess participation, is needed. Future studies should follow recommended methodological standards. WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS: Seven instruments have been used to assess participation in young people with autism. One instrument, with excellent measurement properties in one study, does not comprehensively assess participation. Studies of three instruments that incorporate a more comprehensive assessment of participation have methodological limitations. Overall, limited evidence exists regarding measurement properties of participation assessments for young people with autism.
Authors: Christine Resch; Mette Van Kruijsbergen; Marjolijn Ketelaar; Petra Hurks; Brooke Adair; Christine Imms; Arend De Kloet; Barbara Piskur; Caroline Van Heugten Journal: Dev Med Child Neurol Date: 2020-01-23 Impact factor: 5.449