Literature DB >> 29230544

Size discrimination in barn owls as compared to humans.

Torsten Stemmler1,2, Petra Nikolay1, Aline Nüttgens1, Jan Skorupa1,3, Julius Orlowski1, Hermann Wagner4.   

Abstract

We tested how well barn owls can discriminate objects of different sizes. This ability may be important for the owls when catching prey. We performed a quantitative experiment in the laboratory and trained owls in a task in which the owls had to discriminate whether two rhombi presented simultaneously on a computer monitor were of the same or of different sizes. We obtained full data sets with two experienced owls and one data point with a third owl. For objects being sufficiently larger than the spatial resolution of the barn owl, the angular threshold was related to object size, implying that the discrimination followed Weber's law. The range of Weber fractions we determined was between 0.026 and 0.09. For object sizes close to the spatial resolution, performance degraded. We conducted similar experiments with human subjects. Human thresholds showed the same dependence on object size, albeit down to smaller object sizes. Human performance resulted in a range of Weber fractions extending from 0.025 to 0.036. The differences between owls and humans could be explained by the much higher spatial acuity of humans compared with owls.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Stevens’s power law; Tyto; Visual behavior; Weber fraction; Weber’s law

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29230544     DOI: 10.1007/s00359-017-1241-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol        ISSN: 0340-7594            Impact factor:   1.836


  30 in total

1.  Horizontal-disparity tuning of neurons in the visual forebrain of the behaving barn owl.

Authors:  A Nieder; H Wagner
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Shape and size discrimination compared.

Authors:  Jacob Nachmias
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2010-12-21       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Effects of varying stimulus size on object recognition in pigeons.

Authors:  Jessie J Peissig; Kimberly Kirkpatrick; Michael E Young; Edward E Wasserman; Irving Biederman
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2006-10

4.  Judging spatial properties of simple figures.

Authors:  Jacob Nachmias
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2008-04-14       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Peripheral visual acuity with special reference to scotopic illumination.

Authors:  J MANDELBAUM; L L SLOAN
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1947-05       Impact factor: 5.258

6.  On the theory of Weber fractions.

Authors:  K H Norwich
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1987-09

7.  Receptive fields and functional architecture of monkey striate cortex.

Authors:  D H Hubel; T N Wiesel
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1968-03       Impact factor: 5.182

8.  A verification of Weber's law for visual discrimination of disc sizes in the Bering Sea spotted seal, Phoca largha.

Authors:  D Wartzok; G C Ray
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1976       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  The role of body size in predator recognition by untrained birds.

Authors:  Jana Beránková; Petr Veselý; Roman Fuchs
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2015-10-09       Impact factor: 1.777

10.  UNDERWATER VISUAL DISCRIMINATION BY THE CALIFORNIA SEA LION.

Authors:  R J SCHUSTERMAN; W N KELLOGG; C E RICE
Journal:  Science       Date:  1965-03-26       Impact factor: 47.728

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.