Literature DB >> 18407313

Judging spatial properties of simple figures.

Jacob Nachmias1.   

Abstract

Discrimination was measured for height, area, and aspect ratio of ovals and rectangles. Random jittering of the orthogonal property (width, aspect ratio, and area) was used to control the observers' criterion. Weber fractions for aspect ratio were consistently lower than those for area, and about the same as those for height. Performance with ovals and rectangles did not differ significantly. Two different methods were employed to assess the side effects of jittering. It was found that jittering reduces the discriminability of each property, though less for aspect ratio than for height or area. The hypothesis that judgements of both area and aspect ratio are linear combination of noisy estimates of height and width predicts Weber fractions for aspect ratio and for area to be 2(1/2) times higher than those for height. Results from unjittered trials clearly reject the hypothesis with respect to aspect ratio but not for area.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18407313     DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2008.02.024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  8 in total

1.  Efficiencies for the statistics of size discrimination.

Authors:  Joshua A Solomon; Michael Morgan; Charles Chubb
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2011-10-19       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  Proximity model of perceived numerosity.

Authors:  Jüri Allik; Aire Raidvee
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-04-11       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  Size discrimination in barn owls as compared to humans.

Authors:  Torsten Stemmler; Petra Nikolay; Aline Nüttgens; Jan Skorupa; Julius Orlowski; Hermann Wagner
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2017-12-11       Impact factor: 1.836

4.  Young children's understanding of "more" and discrimination of number and surface area.

Authors:  Darko Odic; Paul Pietroski; Tim Hunter; Jeffrey Lidz; Justin Halberda
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2012-06-11       Impact factor: 3.051

5.  Separating the contributions of primary and unwanted cues in psychophysical studies.

Authors:  Huanping Dai; Christophe Micheyl
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2012-07-30       Impact factor: 8.934

6.  Developmental change in the acuity of approximate number and area representations.

Authors:  Darko Odic; Melissa E Libertus; Lisa Feigenson; Justin Halberda
Journal:  Dev Psychol       Date:  2012-08-13

Review 7.  Visual adaptation and face perception.

Authors:  Michael A Webster; Donald I A MacLeod
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2011-06-12       Impact factor: 6.237

8.  rTMS of the superior parietal lobule improves contrast discrimination but has no effect on the perception of distance between stimuli in the image plane.

Authors:  Nicolo Biagi; Charlotte Goodwin; David T Field
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2022-08-15       Impact factor: 1.695

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.