| Literature DB >> 29230152 |
Julie Lucero1, Nina Wallerstein2, Bonnie Duran3, Margarita Alegria4, Ella Greene-Moton5, Barbara Israel6, Sarah Kastelic7, Maya Magarati3, John Oetzel8, Cynthia Pearson3, Amy Schulz6, Malia Villegas9, Emily R White Hat10.
Abstract
This article describes a mixed methods study of community-based participatory research (CBPR) partnership practices and the links between these practices and changes in health status and disparities outcomes. Directed by a CBPR conceptual model and grounded in indigenous-transformative theory, our nation-wide, cross-site study showcases the value of a mixed methods approach for better understanding the complexity of CBPR partnerships across diverse community and research contexts. The article then provides examples of how an iterative, integrated approach to our mixed methods analysis yielded enriched understandings of two key constructs of the model: trust and governance. Implications and lessons learned while using mixed methods to study CBPR are provided.Entities:
Keywords: community-based participatory research; community-engaged research; complexity; mixed methods research; pragmatism
Year: 2016 PMID: 29230152 PMCID: PMC5722275 DOI: 10.1177/1558689816633309
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Mix Methods Res ISSN: 1558-6898