| Literature DB >> 29229529 |
Chun-Hao Jiang1, Ping Xie2, Ke Li2, Yue-Sheng Xie2, Liu-Jun Chen3, Jin-Suo Wang4, Quan Xu2, Jian-Hua Guo5.
Abstract
Biofertilizer Ning shield was composed of different strains of plant growth promotion bacteria. In this study, the plant growth promotion and root-knot nematode disease control potential on Trichosanthes kirilowii in the field were evaluated. The application of Ning shield significantly reduced the diseases severity caused by Meloidogyne incognita, the biocontrol efficacy could reached up to 51.08%. Ning shield could also promote the growth of T. kirilowii in the field by increasing seedling emergence, height and the root weight. The results showed that the Ning shield could enhance the production yield up to 36.26%. Ning shield could also promote the plant growth by increasing the contents of available nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium and organic matter, and increasing the contents of leaf chlorophyll and carotenoid pigment. Moreover, Ning shield could efficiently enhance the medicinal compositions of Trichosanthes, referring to the polysaccharides and trichosanthin. Therefore, Ning shield is a promising biofertilizer, which can offer beneficial effects to T. kirilowii growers, including the plant growth promotion, the biological control of root-knot disease and enhancement of the yield and the medicinal quality.Entities:
Keywords: Biofertilizer Ning shield; Biological control; Plant growth promotion; Root-knot nematode (RKN); Trichosanthes kirilowii
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29229529 PMCID: PMC5914141 DOI: 10.1016/j.bjm.2017.08.009
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Braz J Microbiol ISSN: 1517-8382 Impact factor: 2.476
The Biocontrol efficacy of biofertilizer Ning shield to the root-knot nematode on T. kirilowii.
| Treatment | RKN number/g soil | Drop rate (%) | Disease severity (%) | Biocontrol efficacy (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ning shield | 4.97 ± 1.73 | 62.83 | 36.0 ± 3.79 | 51.08 |
| Control | 13.38 ± 2.45 | – | 73.5 ± 5.18 | – |
Note: Data are presented as means of three replicates ± SD, and error bars represent SD for three replicates.
Significant difference at 0.05 level (p < 0.05; LSD test).
Fig. 1The biocontrol efficacy of biofertilizer Ning shield to the root-knot nematode on T. kirilowii. Note: The symptoms of the root-knot nematode disease development on the root of T. kirilowii 2 years post Ning shield treatment.
The effect of biofertilizer Ning shield on the rate and growth parameters of T. kirilowii seedling.
| Treatment | Seedling emergence rate (%) | Stem height (cm) | Stem diameter (mm) | Leaves Numbers | Leaves area (cm2) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ning shield | 96.25 ± 2.25 | 160.09 ± 5.79 | 8.80 ± 0.98 | 22.05 ± 1.64 | 62.16 ± 1.62 |
| Control | 84.25 ± 4.06 | 78.38 ± 3.32 | 6.40 ± 0.81 | 16.30 ± 1.13 | 39.54 ± 1.75 |
Note: Data are presented as means of three replicates ± SD, and error bars represent SD for three replicates.
Significant difference at 0.05 level (p < 0.05; LSD test).
Fig. 2The growth promotion of biofertilizer Ning shield to T. kirilowii. Note: The ground symptoms of the plant growth promotion to T. kirilowii 60 days post Ning shield treatment.
Effect of biofertilizer Ning shield on production of T. kirilowii ground and underground parts.
| Treatment | Fresh weight | Dry weight | Drying rate (%) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Root weight (kg) | Yield/mu (kg) | Yield increase rate (%) | Root weight (kg) | Yield/mu (kg) | Yield increase rate (%) | ||
| Ning shield | 2.53 ± 0.12 | 2023.2 ± 97.0 | 20.83 | 0.98 ± 0.05 | 783.2 ± 37.5 | 36.26 | 38.71 ± 0.44 |
| Control | 2.16 ± 0.15 | 1674.4 ± 74.4 | – | 0.74 ± 0.05 | 574.8 ± 25.5 | – | 34.33 ± 0.80 |
Note: Data are presented as means of three replicates ± SD, and error bars represent SD for three replicates.
Significant difference at 0.05 level (p < 0.05; LSD test).
Fig. 3The growth promotion and yield increasing effect of biofertilizer Ning shield on T. kirilowii. Note: The phenotype of the plant growth promotion to T. kirilowii 2 years post Ning shield treatment.
The Effect of biofertilizer Ning shield on the chlorophyll content of T. kirilowii.
| Treatment | Chlorophyll a (mg/g) | Chlorophyll b (mg/g) | Chlorophyll a + b (mg/g) | Chlorophyll a/b | Carotenoid pigment (mg/g) | SPAD value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ning shield | 1.61 ± 0.01 | 0.54 ± 0.00 | 2.14 ± 0.01 | 2.97 ± 0.052 | 0.45 ± 0.01 | 56.11 ± 3.70 |
| Control | 1.48 ± 0.005 | 0.46 ± 0.005 | 1.94 ± 0.009 | 3.17 ± 0.03 | 0.38 ± 0.002 | 48.15 ± 3.33 |
Note: Data are presented as means of three replicates ± SD, and error bars represent SD for three replicates.
Significant difference at 0.05 level (p < 0.05; LSD test).
The Effect of biofertilizer Ning shield on soil ammonium nitrogen, available phosphorus, available potassium and organic matter content.
| Treatment | Ammonium nitrogen (mg/kg) | Available phosphorus (mg/kg) | Available potassium (mg/kg) | Organics matter (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ning shield | 15.86 ± 1.76 | 42.20 ± 2.72 | 249.6 ± 19.6 | 0.644 ± 0.063 |
| Control | 12.085 ± 0.67 | 29.76 ± 3.15 | 165.4 ± 10.7 | 0.506 ± 0.063 |
Note: Data are presented as means of three replicates ± SD, and error bars represent SD for three replicates.
Significant difference at 0.05 level (p < 0.05; LSD test).
The impact of biofertilizer Ning shield on the quality of T. kirilowii.
| Treatment | Polysaccharide content (mg/g) | Trichosanthin content (mg/g) |
|---|---|---|
| Ning shield | 184.67 ± 4.34 | 7.75 ± 0.16 |
| Control | 164.51 ± 1.63 | 6.64 ± 0.19 |
Note: Data are presented as means of three replicates ± SD, and error bars represent SD for three replicates.
Significant difference at 0.05 level (p < 0.05; LSD test).