Literature DB >> 20515222

Wanting, liking, and preference construction.

Xianchi Dai1, C Miguel Brendl2, Dan Ariely3.   

Abstract

According to theories on preference construction, multiple preferences result from multiple contexts (e.g., loss vs. gain frames). This implies that people can have different representations of a preference in different contexts. Drawing on Berridge's (1999) distinction between unconscious liking and wanting, we hypothesize that people may have multiple representations of a preference toward an object even within a single context. Specifically, we propose that people can have different representations of an object's motivational value, or incentive value, versus its emotional value, or likability, even when the object is placed in the same context. Study 1 establishes a divergence between incentive value and likability of faces using behavioral measures. Studies 2A and 2B, using self-report measures, provide support for our main hypothesis that people are perfectly aware of these distinct representations and are able to access them concurrently at will. We also discuss implications of our findings for the truism that people seek pleasure and for expectancy-value theories.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20515222     DOI: 10.1037/a0017987

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Emotion        ISSN: 1528-3542


  17 in total

1.  What motivates individuals with ADHD? A qualitative analysis from the adolescent's point of view.

Authors:  Sarah Morsink; Edmund Sonuga-Barke; Gabry Mies; Nathalie Glorie; Jurgen Lemiere; Saskia Van der Oord; Marina Danckaerts
Journal:  Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry       Date:  2017-02-23       Impact factor: 4.785

2.  Motivated to win: Relationship between anticipatory and outcome reward-related neural activity.

Authors:  Narun Pornpattananangkul; Robin Nusslock
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2015-10-01       Impact factor: 2.310

3.  The effects of monetary and social rewards on task performance in children and adolescents: liking is not enough.

Authors:  Ellen Demurie; Herbert Roeyers; Dieter Baeyens; Edmund Sonuga-Barke
Journal:  Int J Methods Psychiatr Res       Date:  2012-11-12       Impact factor: 4.035

4.  Beauty at a glance: The feeling of beauty and the amplitude of pleasure are independent of stimulus duration.

Authors:  Aenne A Brielmann; Lauren Vale; Denis G Pelli
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  Focusing on the negative: cultural differences in expressions of sympathy.

Authors:  Birgit Koopmann-Holm; Jeanne L Tsai
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2014-09-22

6.  Hot or not: response inhibition reduces the hedonic value and motivational incentive of sexual stimuli.

Authors:  Anne E Ferrey; Alexandra Frischen; Mark J Fenske
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-12-26

7.  The effect of cleft lip on adults' responses to faces: cross-species findings.

Authors:  Christine E Parsons; Katherine S Young; Emma Parsons; Annika Dean; Lynne Murray; Tim Goodacre; Louise Dalton; Alan Stein; Morten L Kringelbach
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-10-10       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  The motivational salience of infant faces is similar for men and women.

Authors:  Christine E Parsons; Katherine S Young; Nina Kumari; Alan Stein; Morten L Kringelbach
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-05-31       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Humans Integrate Monetary and Liquid Incentives to Motivate Cognitive Task Performance.

Authors:  Debbie M Yee; Marie K Krug; Ariel Z Allen; Todd S Braver
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-01-21

10.  Individual visual working memory capacities and related brain oscillatory activities are modulated by color preferences.

Authors:  Masahiro Kawasaki; Yoko Yamaguchi
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2012-11-27       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.