Literature DB >> 29226777

Collaborative-controlled LASSO for constructing propensity score-based estimators in high-dimensional data.

Cheng Ju1, Richard Wyss2, Jessica M Franklin2, Sebastian Schneeweiss2, Jenny Häggström3, Mark J van der Laan1.   

Abstract

Propensity score-based estimators are increasingly used for causal inference in observational studies. However, model selection for propensity score estimation in high-dimensional data has received little attention. In these settings, propensity score models have traditionally been selected based on the goodness-of-fit for the treatment mechanism itself, without consideration of the causal parameter of interest. Collaborative minimum loss-based estimation is a novel methodology for causal inference that takes into account information on the causal parameter of interest when selecting a propensity score model. This "collaborative learning" considers variable associations with both treatment and outcome when selecting a propensity score model in order to minimize a bias-variance tradeoff in the estimated treatment effect. In this study, we introduce a novel approach for collaborative model selection when using the LASSO estimator for propensity score estimation in high-dimensional covariate settings. To demonstrate the importance of selecting the propensity score model collaboratively, we designed quasi-experiments based on a real electronic healthcare database, where only the potential outcomes were manually generated, and the treatment and baseline covariates remained unchanged. Results showed that the collaborative minimum loss-based estimation algorithm outperformed other competing estimators for both point estimation and confidence interval coverage. In addition, the propensity score model selected by collaborative minimum loss-based estimation could be applied to other propensity score-based estimators, which also resulted in substantive improvement for both point estimation and confidence interval coverage. We illustrate the discussed concepts through an empirical example comparing the effects of non-selective nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs with selective COX-2 inhibitors on gastrointestinal complications in a population of Medicare beneficiaries.

Entities:  

Keywords:  LASSO; Propensity score; average treatment effect; collaborative targeted minimum loss-based estimation; electronic healthcare database; model selection

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29226777      PMCID: PMC6039292          DOI: 10.1177/0962280217744588

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res        ISSN: 0962-2802            Impact factor:   3.021


  31 in total

1.  High-dimensional versus conventional propensity scores in a comparative effectiveness study of coxibs and reduced upper gastrointestinal complications.

Authors:  E Garbe; S Kloss; M Suling; I Pigeot; S Schneeweiss
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2012-07-05       Impact factor: 2.953

2.  Regularized Regression Versus the High-Dimensional Propensity Score for Confounding Adjustment in Secondary Database Analyses.

Authors:  Jessica M Franklin; Wesley Eddings; Robert J Glynn; Sebastian Schneeweiss
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2015-08-01       Impact factor: 4.897

3.  Doubly robust estimation in missing data and causal inference models.

Authors:  Heejung Bang; James M Robins
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  High-dimensional propensity score algorithm in comparative effectiveness research with time-varying interventions.

Authors:  Romain Neugebauer; Julie A Schmittdiel; Zheng Zhu; Jeremy A Rassen; John D Seeger; Sebastian Schneeweiss
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2014-12-08       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  Performance of the High-dimensional Propensity Score in a Nordic Healthcare Model.

Authors:  Jesper Hallas; Anton Pottegård
Journal:  Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol       Date:  2017-01-16       Impact factor: 4.080

6.  Studies with many covariates and few outcomes: selecting covariates and implementing propensity-score-based confounding adjustments.

Authors:  Elisabetta Patorno; Robert J Glynn; Sonia Hernández-Díaz; Jun Liu; Sebastian Schneeweiss
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 4.822

7.  Confounding adjustment via a semi-automated high-dimensional propensity score algorithm: an application to electronic medical records.

Authors:  Sengwee Toh; Luis A García Rodríguez; Miguel A Hernán
Journal:  Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf       Date:  2011-06-30       Impact factor: 2.890

8.  Regularization Paths for Generalized Linear Models via Coordinate Descent.

Authors:  Jerome Friedman; Trevor Hastie; Rob Tibshirani
Journal:  J Stat Softw       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 6.440

9.  Proton pump inhibitors and the risk of hospitalisation for community-acquired pneumonia: replicated cohort studies with meta-analysis.

Authors:  Kristian B Filion; Dan Chateau; Laura E Targownik; Andrea Gershon; Madeleine Durand; Hala Tamim; Gary F Teare; Pietro Ravani; Pierre Ernst; Colin R Dormuth
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2013-07-15       Impact factor: 23.059

10.  Effects of aggregation of drug and diagnostic codes on the performance of the high-dimensional propensity score algorithm: an empirical example.

Authors:  Hoa V Le; Charles Poole; M Alan Brookhart; Victor J Schoenbach; Kathleen J Beach; J Bradley Layton; Til Stürmer
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2013-11-19       Impact factor: 4.615

View more
  4 in total

1.  Theory meets practice: a commentary on VanderWeele's 'principles of confounder selection'.

Authors:  Sebastian Schneeweiss
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2019-03-06       Impact factor: 8.082

2.  Synthetic Negative Controls: Using Simulation to Screen Large-scale Propensity Score Analyses.

Authors:  Richard Wyss; Sebastian Schneeweiss; Kueiyu Joshua Lin; David P Miller; Linda Kalilani; Jessica M Franklin
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2022-04-12       Impact factor: 4.860

Review 3.  When Can Nonrandomized Studies Support Valid Inference Regarding Effectiveness or Safety of New Medical Treatments?

Authors:  Jessica M Franklin; Richard Platt; Nancy A Dreyer; Alex John London; Gregory E Simon; Jonathan H Watanabe; Michael Horberg; Adrian Hernandez; Robert M Califf
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2021-05-09       Impact factor: 6.903

Review 4.  Machine learning for improving high-dimensional proxy confounder adjustment in healthcare database studies: An overview of the current literature.

Authors:  Richard Wyss; Chen Yanover; Tal El-Hay; Dimitri Bennett; Robert W Platt; Andrew R Zullo; Grammati Sari; Xuerong Wen; Yizhou Ye; Hongbo Yuan; Mugdha Gokhale; Elisabetta Patorno; Kueiyu Joshua Lin
Journal:  Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf       Date:  2022-07-05       Impact factor: 2.732

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.