| Literature DB >> 29225323 |
Maria Grazia Palmerini1, Manuel Belli1, Stefania Annarita Nottola2, Selenia Miglietta2, Serena Bianchi1, Sara Bernardi1, Sevastiani Antonouli1, Sandra Cecconi1, Giuseppe Familiari2, Guido Macchiarelli1.
Abstract
Mancozeb, an ethylene bis-dithiocarbamate, is widely used as a fungicide and exerts reproductive toxicity in vivo and in vitro in mouse oocytes by altering spindle morphology and impairing the ability to fertilize. Mancozeb also induces a premalignant status in mouse granulosa cells (GCs) cultured in vitro, as indicated by decreased p53 expression and tenuous oxidative stress. However, the presence and extent of ultrastructural alterations induced by mancozeb on GCs in vitro have not yet been reported. Using an in vitro model of reproductive toxicity, comprising parietal GCs from mouse antral follicles cultured with increasing concentrations of mancozeb (0.001-1 µg/ml), we sought to ascertain the in vitro ultrastructural cell toxicity by means of transmission (TEM) and scanning (SEM) electron microscopy. The results showed a dose-dependent toxicity of mancozeb on mouse GCs. Ultrastructural data showed intercellular contact alterations, nuclear membrane irregularities, and chromatin marginalization at lower concentrations, and showed chromatin condensation, membrane blebbing, and cytoplasmic vacuolization at higher concentrations. Morphometric analysis evidenced a reduction of mitochondrial length in GCs exposed to mancozeb 0.01-1 µg/ml and a dose-dependent increase of vacuole dimension. In conclusion, mancozeb induced dose-dependent toxicity against GCs in vitro, including ultrastructural signs of cell degeneration compatible with apoptosis, likely due to the toxic breakdown product ethylenethiourea. These alterations may represent a major cause of reduced/delayed/missed oocyte maturation in cases of infertility associated with exposure to pesticides.Entities:
Keywords: Granulosa cells; Mancozeb; Scanning electron microscopy; Transmission electron microscopy; Ultrastructure
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29225323 PMCID: PMC5830361 DOI: 10.1262/jrd.2017-143
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Reprod Dev ISSN: 0916-8818 Impact factor: 2.214
Fig. 1.Ultrastructural analysis of GCs in control and mancozeb 0.001 µg/ml groups. A–C. Control. A. Ultrastructure of a granulosa cell (GC) with a large nucleus (N) delimited by a continuous nuclear membrane (nm), numerous round/ovoid mitochondria (m) with extensive cristae, and elements of the endoplasmic reticulum (ER). A vacuole (V) with electron-lucent content is also shown (TEM. Bar: 400 nm). Inset in A: A representative image of a semithin section of GCs (LM. Mag: 40 ×). B. Cytoplasmic content of a GC showing a lysosome (Ly), lipid droplets (ld), tubular elements of the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), and mitochondria (m) surrounded by a double membrane (TEM. Bar: 200 nm). C. Adjacent cells (GC) are connected by numerous long, thin pseudopodia (arrows). The surface of the outer layer of GCs shows densely packed microvilli (mv) (SEM. Bar: 40 µm). D–F. Mancozeb 0.001 µg/ml. D. Three granulosa cells (GC) with roundish nuclei (N) and small spots of marginalized chromatin under the double layer of the nuclear membrane (nm). Numerous mitochondria (m) and extensive mitochondrial cristae are visible in the cytoplasm. Arrow indicates intercellular connections among adjacent cells; mv: short microvilli (TEM. Bar: 1 µm). Inset in D. A representative image of a semithin section of GCs (LM. Mag: 40 ×). E. At high magnification, a transversal section evidences the arrangement of numerous mitochondrial cristae of mitochondria (m) and parallel tubular elements of the endoplasmic reticulum (ER). V: vacuoles; He: heterochromatin; Eu: euchromatin (TEM. Bar: 1 µm). F. Adherent granulosa cells (GCs), with a smooth appearance, are covered by roundish cells covered by numerous microvilli (mv). GCs are connected by means of numerous long, thin pseudopodia (arrows) (SEM. Bar: 40 µm).
Summary of main results obtained by TEM and SEM observations –Comparisons of ultrastructural characteristics were performed with respect to the less-exposed group
| Control | Mancozeb | ||||
| 0.001 µg/ml | 0.01 µg/ml | 0.1 µg/ml | 1 µg/ml | ||
| Nuclear membrane shape | roundish | roundish | invaginated | invaginated | invaginated or interrupted |
| Chromatin | uniformly distributed; occasionally clustered | uniformly distributed; occasionally condensed and marginalized | condensed and marginalized | condensed and marginalized | condensed and marginalized |
| Mitochondria | numerous, rich of electron-dense cristae | numerous, rich of electron-dense cristae | numerous, rich of electron-dense cristae | numerous, rich of cristae | less visible, more opalescent and with less electron-dense cristae |
| Vacuoles | few | few | numerous | numerous | abundant |
| Cytoplasmic projection | numerous, long and thin | numerous, long and thin | reduced in number and length | reduced in number and length | rare and short |
| Microvilli | numerous, long and thin | numerous, long and thin | less numerous, shorter and thicker | less numerous, shorter and thicker | rare, short and thick |
| Blebbing | occasional | occasional | occasional | frequent | numerous |
| Cell debris/fragments | rare | rare | occasional | frequent | abundant |
Fig. 2.Ultrastructural analysis of GCs in mancozeb 0.01–1 µg/ml groups. A–B. Mancozeb 0.01 µg/ml. A. Two adjacent granulosa cells (GCs) with different phenotypes: the one on the right, with a roundish shape and nucleus (N), shows good preservation of the cytoplasm with numerous mitochondria (m), vacuoles (V), and endoplasmic reticulum (ER); the other on the left, with high preservation of mitochondria (m), vacuoles (V), and other organelles, shows significant blebbing (b). He: heterochromatin; Eu: euchromatin (TEM. Bar: 2 µm). Inset in A: Representative image of a semithin section of GCs (LM. Mag: 40 ×). B. Smooth, adherent GCs covered with irregular cells with highly blebbed surfaces (b). Connecting pseudopodia (arrows) are reduced in number and extension (SEM. Bar: 40 µm). C–D. Mancozeb 0.1 µg/ml. C. Granulosa cell (GC) showing high preservation with numerous ovoid mitochondria (m), surrounding a nucleus (N) delimited by a nuclear membrane (nm). Upper inset in C: Representative image of a semithin section of GCs (LM. Mag: 40 ×). Lower inset in C: Altered GCs with cytoplasmic fragments (cf) released in proximity to the nucleus (N); nm: nuclear membrane. D. Smooth adherent GCs are covered by small and roundish blebs; superficial GCs appear rich of blebs. Arrows: detail of pseudopodia, short and rare (SEM. Bar: 40 µm). Inset in D: High magnification of a cytoplasmic bleb (b) (SEM. Bar: 8 µm). E–F. Mancozeb 1 µg/ml. E. Altered, irregularly-shaped cells, highly vacuolated (V) and with extensive blebbing (b), interspersed in cell fragments (cf), containing numerous membrane-bound organelle remnants, and debris (*) (TEM. Bar: 4 µm). N: nucleus. Inset in E: Representative image of a semithin section of GCs (LM, Mag: 40 ×). F. Abundant blebbing (b) is visible on the GC surface. Note the scarcity of cytoplasmic projections (arrow), with a quasi-absence of pseudopodia (SEM. Bar: 40 µm). Inset in F: High magnification of degenerating GCs, completely covered by cytoplasmic blebs (b) (SEM. Bar: 8 µm).
Dimension and number (expressed as mean ± standard deviation) of mitochondria and vacuoles in granulosa cells (GCs) exposed or not (control) to mancozeb 0.001–1 µg/m
| Control | Mancozeb | ||||
| 0.001 µg/ml | 0.01 µg/ml | 0.1 µg/ml | 1 µg/ml | ||
| Mitochondria (µm) | 0.550 ± 0.074 a | 0.539 ± 0.127 a | 0.364 ± 0.091 b | 0.366 ± 0.074 b | 0.437 ± 0.087 b |
| N. of mitochondria | 25 ± 8 a | 24 ± 8 a | 29 ± 9 a | 40 ± 6 b | 24 ± 11 a |
| Vacuoles (µm) | 0.336 ± 0.141 a | 0.546 ± 0.186 b | 0.689 ± 0.314 b | 0.804 ± 0.289 b, c | 1.059 ± 0.170 c |
| N. of vacuoles | 8 ± 4 a | 9 ± 4 a | 15 ± 4 b | 16 ± 5 b | 16 ± 4 b |
Approximately 10–20 mitochondria and 5–10 vacuoles were measured in low magnification TEM micrographs from at least 15 GCs from three different experiments. Morphometry was performed using one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s HSD post-hoc analysis.