Literature DB >> 29225024

At Birth, Humans Associate "Few" with Left and "Many" with Right.

Maria Dolores de Hevia1, Ludovica Veggiotti2, Arlette Streri2, Cory D Bonn2.   

Abstract

Humans use spatial representations to structure abstract concepts [1]. One of the most well-known examples is the "mental number line"-the propensity to imagine numbers oriented in space [2, 3]. Human infants [4, 5], children [6, 7], adults [8], and nonhuman animals [9, 10] associate small numbers with the left side of space and large numbers with the right. In humans, cultural artifacts, such as the direction of reading and writing, modulate the directionality of this representation, with right-to-left reading cultures associating small numbers with right and large numbers with left [11], whereas the opposite association permeates left-to-right reading cultures [8]. Number-space mapping plays a central role in human mathematical concepts [12], but its origins remain unclear: is it the result of an innate bias or does it develop after birth? Infant humans are passively exposed to a spatially coded environment, so experience and culture could underlie the mental number line. To rule out this possibility, we tested neonates' responses to small or large auditory quantities paired with geometric figures presented on either the left or right sides of the screen. We show that 0- to 3-day-old neonates associate a small quantity with the left and a large quantity with the right when the multidimensional stimulus contains discrete numerical information, providing evidence that representations of number are associated to an oriented space at the start of postnatal life, prior to experience with language, culture, or with culture-specific biases.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  mental number line; newborns; number; number-space mapping

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29225024     DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2017.11.024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Biol        ISSN: 0960-9822            Impact factor:   10.834


  14 in total

1.  Operational momentum for magnitude ordering in preschool children and adults.

Authors:  Hannah Dunn; Nicky Bernstein; Maria Dolores de Hevia; Viola Macchi Cassia; Hermann Bulf; Koleen McCrink
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  2018-12-15

2.  Abstract representations of small sets in newborns.

Authors:  Lucie Martin; Julien Marie; Mélanie Brun; Maria Dolores de Hevia; Arlette Streri; Véronique Izard
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2022-06-04

Review 3.  Number, time, and space are not singularly represented: Evidence against a common magnitude system beyond early childhood.

Authors:  Karina Hamamouche; Sara Cordes
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2019-06

4.  A left visual advantage for quantity processing in neonates.

Authors:  Koleen McCrink; Ludovica Veggiotti; Maria Dolores de Hevia
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2020-08-17       Impact factor: 5.691

5.  A gifted SNARC? Directional spatial-numerical associations in gifted children with high-level math skills do not differ from controls.

Authors:  Yunfeng He; Hans- Christoph Nuerk; Alexander Derksen; Jiannong Shi; Xinlin Zhou; Krzysztof Cipora
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2020-05-24

6.  Eye Tracking Lateralized Spatial Associations in Early Childhood.

Authors:  Eloise West; Koleen McCrink
Journal:  J Cogn Dev       Date:  2021-06-21

7.  From Innate Spatial Biases to Enculturated Spatial Cognition: The Case of Spatial Associations in Number and Other Sequences.

Authors:  Koleen McCrink; Maria Dolores de Hevia
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-03-29

8.  The Developmental Trajectory of the Operational Momentum Effect.

Authors:  Pedro Pinheiro-Chagas; Daniele Didino; Vitor G Haase; Guilherme Wood; André Knops
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-07-17

9.  Numerical magnitude, rather than individual bias, explains spatial numerical association in newborn chicks.

Authors:  Rosa Rugani; Giorgio Vallortigara; Konstantinos Priftis; Lucia Regolin
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-06-25       Impact factor: 8.140

10.  Commentary: A mental number line in human newborns.

Authors:  Arianna Felisatti; Jochen Laubrock; Samuel Shaki; Martin H Fischer
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2020-03-24       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.