Literature DB >> 35330699

Eye Tracking Lateralized Spatial Associations in Early Childhood.

Eloise West1, Koleen McCrink1.   

Abstract

This experiment tests the age at which left-to-right spatial associations found in infancy shift to culture-specific spatial biases in later childhood, for both numerical and non-numerical information. Children ages 1 to 5 years (N=320) were tested within an eye-tracking paradigm which required passive viewing of a video portraying a spatial transposition. In this video, an item was hidden in a vertical set of locations, which were then surreptitiously rotated 90°. There were several conditions, which varied in the degree to which the locations were presented alongside ordinal (numerical, alphabetical) or non-ordinal (nonsense label) information. After transposition, a narrator prompted the child to visually search the array. The amount of time spent fixating in a location consistent with a left-to-right mapping or a right-to-left mapping was measured to gauge the degree and laterality of spatial associations. Overall, children looked more towards locations consistent with a left-to-right mapping. This effect fluctuated with age, dipping as children entered toddlerhood, increasing in 3- and 4-year-olds, and then disappearing at age 5. The ordinal nature of the stimuli (e.g., numerical or non-numerical) did not influence the laterality of the spatial associations. A follow-up experiment confirms that, like older preschoolers, adults (N=66) also exhibit no spontaneous left-to-right mapping bias in this paradigm, with no fluctuation as a result of condition. These data support the presence of a decrease in left-to-right processing around the age of two, as children recede from infantile spatial biases and progress to exhibiting culture-specific spatial biases in early childhood.

Entities:  

Keywords:  eye-tracking; laterality; number; space; spatial associations; toddlerhood

Year:  2021        PMID: 35330699      PMCID: PMC8942349          DOI: 10.1080/15248372.2021.1926254

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cogn Dev        ISSN: 1524-8372


  41 in total

1.  Spatial representation of pitch height: the SMARC effect.

Authors:  Elena Rusconi; Bonnie Kwan; Bruno L Giordano; Carlo Umiltà; Brian Butterworth
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2005-05-31

2.  G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences.

Authors:  Franz Faul; Edgar Erdfelder; Albert-Georg Lang; Axel Buchner
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2007-05

3.  Placing order in space: the SNARC effect in serial learning.

Authors:  Paola Previtali; Maria Dolores de Hevia; Luisa Girelli
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-11-04       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  General magnitude representation in human infants.

Authors:  Stella F Lourenco; Matthew R Longo
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2010-04-29

5.  The mental timeline is gradually constructed in childhood.

Authors:  Katharine A Tillman; Nestor Tulagan; Eren Fukuda; David Barner
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2018-05-11

6.  The Early Construction of Spatial Attention: Culture, Space, and Gesture in Parent-Child Interactions.

Authors:  Koleen McCrink; Christina Caldera; Samuel Shaki
Journal:  Child Dev       Date:  2017-04-05

7.  Culturally-Driven Biases in Preschoolers' Spatial Search Strategies for Ordinal and Non-Ordinal Dimensions.

Authors:  Koleen McCrink; Samuel Shaki; Talia Berkowitz
Journal:  Cogn Dev       Date:  2014-04-01

8.  Functional imaging of numerical processing in adults and 4-y-old children.

Authors:  Jessica F Cantlon; Elizabeth M Brannon; Elizabeth J Carter; Kevin A Pelphrey
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2006-04-11       Impact factor: 8.029

9.  From Innate Spatial Biases to Enculturated Spatial Cognition: The Case of Spatial Associations in Number and Other Sequences.

Authors:  Koleen McCrink; Maria Dolores de Hevia
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-03-29

10.  Human infants' preference for left-to-right oriented increasing numerical sequences.

Authors:  Maria Dolores de Hevia; Luisa Girelli; Margaret Addabbo; Viola Macchi Cassia
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-05-06       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.