Literature DB >> 29224637

Valve hemodynamic deterioration and cardiovascular outcomes in TAVR: A report from the STS/ACC TVT Registry.

Sreekanth Vemulapalli1, David R Holmes2, David Dai3, Roland Matsouaka3, Michael J Mack4, Fred L Grover5, Raj R Makkar6, Vinod H Thourani7, Pamela S Douglas3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Recent reports of leaflet abnormalities (detected using advanced imaging) have raised questions regarding transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) durability. We sought to determine the incidence of valve hemodynamic deterioration (VHD) and its association with cardiovascular outcomes. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Consecutive cases with paired postimplant and follow-up echocardiograms from November 2011 to March 2015 in the STS/ACC TVT Registry were allocated into 2 overlapping cohorts: early (paired echocardiograms at 0 and 30 days) and late (paired echocardiograms at 30 days and 1 year). VHD was defined as an increase in mean aortic valve gradient ≥10 mm Hg. Eighteen-month cardiovascular outcomes were determined via linkage with Centers for Medicare &amp; Medicaid Services claims. Backwards selection logistic regression was performed to determine predictors of VHD. Among 10,099 TAVRs with paired echocardiograms, the median age was 84 years and 48.7% were female, with Society of Thoracic Surgeons score distributions of <8% (61.7%), 8%-15% (28.8%), and >15% (9.5%). The incidence of VHD was 2.1% in the early cohort and 2.5% in the late cohort. There was no significant difference between those with and without VHD in either cohort in the combined end point of death/stroke/aortic valve reintervention or heart failure hospitalization or myocardial infarction. Independent predictors of VHD included chronic lung disease, valve-in-valve procedure, 23-mm TAVR valve, severe patient-prosthesis mismatch, increasing body mass index, and increasing baseline aortic valve gradient.
CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of VHD in US clinical practice is low, and VHD is not associated with increased cardiovascular events at 18 months. Patient and procedural predictors may help to identify patients at risk for VHD in whom surveillance or preventive strategies may be considered.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29224637     DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2017.09.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Heart J        ISSN: 0002-8703            Impact factor:   4.749


  3 in total

Review 1.  Valve durability after transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

Authors:  Akash Kataruka; Catherine M Otto
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 2.  Cardiac Computed Tomography: Application in Valvular Heart Disease.

Authors:  Kush P Patel; Sebastian Vandermolen; Anna S Herrey; Emma Cheasty; Leon Menezes; James C Moon; Francesca Pugliese; Thomas A Treibel
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-03-24

3.  Determining value of Coordinated Registry Networks (CRNs): a case of transcatheter valve therapies.

Authors:  Gregory Pappas; Jesse Berlin; Erika Avila-Tang; John Carroll; Joseph Drozda; Douglas Dumont; Thomas Gross; Kathleen Hewitt; Ajay Kirtane; David Kong; Mitchell Krucoff; John Lashinger; Nellie Lew; Michael Mack; Fred Masoudi; Danica Marinac-Dabic; Roxanna Mehran; Sharon-Lise Normand; Elizabeth Quin; Fred Resnic; Art Sedrakyan; Ronald Waksman; Larry Wood; Changfu Wu; Tianay Ziegler
Journal:  BMJ Surg Interv Health Technol       Date:  2019-07-04
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.