Literature DB >> 29224503

Cochrane's risk of bias tool in the context of psychotherapy outcome research.

Thomas Munder1, Jürgen Barth2.   

Abstract

The Cochrane risk of bias tool (RoB) is a widely used measure for methodological quality of randomized controlled trials. This paper discusses RoB's rationale and risk of bias domains, reports on its application in current psychotherapy meta-analyses, and offers comments regarding the application of RoB in the context of psychotherapy outcome research. Our suggestions include focusing on patient's and therapist's expectations when judging the domain "blinding of personnel and participants" and paying greater attention to the domain "selective outcome reporting" and to matters of "treatment implementation."

Entities:  

Keywords:  meta-analysis; outcome research; randomized controlled trials; risk of bias; study quality

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29224503     DOI: 10.1080/10503307.2017.1411628

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychother Res        ISSN: 1050-3307


  27 in total

1.  Encompassing a global mental health perspective into psychotherapy research: a critique of approaches to measuring the efficacy of psychotherapy for depression.

Authors:  Marianna Purgato; Geetha Jayaram; Pamela J Surkan; Judith Bass; Paul Bolton
Journal:  Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci       Date:  2019-01-15       Impact factor: 6.892

2.  Is psychotherapy effective? A re-analysis of treatments for depression.

Authors:  T Munder; C Flückiger; F Leichsenring; A A Abbass; M J Hilsenroth; P Luyten; S Rabung; C Steinert; B E Wampold
Journal:  Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci       Date:  2018-07-30       Impact factor: 6.892

3.  The effect of significant other involvement in treatment for substance use disorders: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Talia Ariss; Catharine E Fairbairn
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  2020-03-12

4.  Are Randomized Controlled Trials on Pharmacotherapy and Psychotherapy for Positive Symptoms of Schizophrenia Comparable? A Systematic Review of Patient and Study Characteristics.

Authors:  Irene Bighelli; Claudia Leucht; Maximilian Huhn; Cornelia Reitmeir; Felicitas Schwermann; Sofia Wallis; John M Davis; Stefan Leucht
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2020-04-10       Impact factor: 9.306

5.  The effectiveness of art therapy for anxiety in adults: A systematic review of randomised and non-randomised controlled trials.

Authors:  Annemarie Abbing; Anne Ponstein; Susan van Hooren; Leo de Sonneville; Hanna Swaab; Erik Baars
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-12-17       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  A meta-analysis of the effect of substance use interventions on emotion outcomes.

Authors:  Dahyeon Kang; Catharine E Fairbairn; Talia A Ariss
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  2019-12

7.  Effectiveness of medication assisted treatment for opioid use in prison and jail settings: A meta-analysis and systematic review.

Authors:  Kelly E Moore; Walter Roberts; Holly H Reid; Kathryn M Z Smith; Lindsay M S Oberleitner; Sherry A McKee
Journal:  J Subst Abuse Treat       Date:  2018-12-15

Review 8.  Attachment- and Emotion-Focused Parenting Interventions for Child and Adolescent Externalizing and Internalizing Behaviors: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Samantha Jugovac; Richard O'Kearney; David J Hawes; Dave S Pasalich
Journal:  Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev       Date:  2022-06-10

9.  The Effectiveness of Psychological Interventions Delivered in Routine Practice: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Chris Gaskell; Melanie Simmonds-Buckley; Stephen Kellett; C Stockton; Erin Somerville; Emily Rogerson; Jaime Delgadillo
Journal:  Adm Policy Ment Health       Date:  2022-10-06

10.  A systematic review of economic analyses of psychological interventions and therapies in health-related settings.

Authors:  Leeanne Nicklas; Mairi Albiston; Martin Dunbar; Alan Gillies; Jennifer Hislop; Helen Moffat; Judy Thomson
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2022-09-07       Impact factor: 2.908

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.