Literature DB >> 29224147

Comprehensive Whole DNA Methylome Analysis by Integrating MeDIP-seq and MRE-seq.

Xiaoyun Xing1, Bo Zhang1, Daofeng Li1, Ting Wang2.   

Abstract

Understanding the role of DNA methylation often requires accurate assessment and comparison of these modifications in a genome-wide fashion. Sequencing-based DNA methylation profiling provides an unprecedented opportunity to map and compare complete DNA CpG methylomes. These include whole genome bisulfite sequencing (WGBS), Reduced-Representation Bisulfite-Sequencing (RRBS), and enrichment-based methods such as MeDIP-seq, MBD-seq, and MRE-seq. An investigator needs a method that is flexible with the quantity of input DNA, provides the appropriate balance among genomic CpG coverage, resolution, quantitative accuracy, and cost, and comes with robust bioinformatics software for analyzing the data. In this chapter, we describe four protocols that combine state-of-the-art experimental strategies with state-of-the-art computational algorithms to achieve this goal. We first introduce two experimental methods that are complementary to each other. MeDIP-seq, or methylation-dependent immunoprecipitation followed by sequencing, uses an anti-methylcytidine antibody to enrich for methylated DNA fragments, and uses massively parallel sequencing to reveal identity of enriched DNA. MRE-seq, or methylation-sensitive restriction enzyme digestion followed by sequencing, relies on a collection of restriction enzymes that recognize CpG containing sequence motifs, but only cut when the CpG is unmethylated. Digested DNA fragments enrich for unmethylated CpGs at their ends, and these CpGs are revealed by massively parallel sequencing. The two computational methods both implement advanced statistical algorithms that integrate MeDIP-seq and MRE-seq data. M&M is a statistical framework to detect differentially methylated regions between two samples. methylCRF is a machine learning framework that predicts CpG methylation levels at single CpG resolution, thus raising the resolution and coverage of MeDIP-seq and MRE-seq to a comparable level of WGBS, but only incurring a cost of less than 5% of WGBS. Together these methods form an effective, robust, and affordable platform for the investigation of genome-wide DNA methylation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  M&M; MRE-seq; MeDIP-seq; methylCRF

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29224147      PMCID: PMC6007844          DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4939-7481-8_12

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Methods Mol Biol        ISSN: 1064-3745


  38 in total

1.  DNA-binding factors shape the mouse methylome at distal regulatory regions.

Authors:  Michael B Stadler; Rabih Murr; Lukas Burger; Robert Ivanek; Florian Lienert; Anne Schöler; Erik van Nimwegen; Christiane Wirbelauer; Edward J Oakeley; Dimos Gaidatzis; Vijay K Tiwari; Dirk Schübeler
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2011-12-14       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Comparison of methyl-DNA immunoprecipitation (MeDIP) and methyl-CpG binding domain (MBD) protein capture for genome-wide DNA methylation analysis reveal CpG sequence coverage bias.

Authors:  Shalima S Nair; Marcel W Coolen; Clare Stirzaker; Jenny Z Song; Aaron L Statham; Dario Strbenac; Mark D Robinson; Susan J Clark
Journal:  Epigenetics       Date:  2011-01-01       Impact factor: 4.528

Review 3.  DNA methylation and human disease.

Authors:  Keith D Robertson
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 53.242

4.  MEDME: an experimental and analytical methodology for the estimation of DNA methylation levels based on microarray derived MeDIP-enrichment.

Authors:  Mattia Pelizzola; Yasuo Koga; Alexander Eckehart Urban; Michael Krauthammer; Sherman Weissman; Ruth Halaban; Annette M Molinaro
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2008-09-02       Impact factor: 9.043

5.  Evidence for non-CpG methylation in mammals.

Authors:  Jie Yan; Juleen R Zierath; Romain Barrès
Journal:  Exp Cell Res       Date:  2011-09-07       Impact factor: 3.905

6.  Non-CpG methylation is prevalent in embryonic stem cells and may be mediated by DNA methyltransferase 3a.

Authors:  B H Ramsahoye; D Biniszkiewicz; F Lyko; V Clark; A P Bird; R Jaenisch
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-05-09       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Dynamic changes in the human methylome during differentiation.

Authors:  Louise Laurent; Eleanor Wong; Guoliang Li; Tien Huynh; Aristotelis Tsirigos; Chin Thing Ong; Hwee Meng Low; Ken Wing Kin Sung; Isidore Rigoutsos; Jeanne Loring; Chia-Lin Wei
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2010-02-04       Impact factor: 9.043

8.  Functional DNA methylation differences between tissues, cell types, and across individuals discovered using the M&M algorithm.

Authors:  Bo Zhang; Yan Zhou; Nan Lin; Rebecca F Lowdon; Chibo Hong; Raman P Nagarajan; Jeffrey B Cheng; Daofeng Li; Michael Stevens; Hyung Joo Lee; Xiaoyun Xing; Jia Zhou; Vasavi Sundaram; Ginell Elliott; Junchen Gu; Taoping Shi; Philippe Gascard; Mahvash Sigaroudinia; Thea D Tlsty; Theresa Kadlecek; Arthur Weiss; Henriette O'Geen; Peggy J Farnham; Cécile L Maire; Keith L Ligon; Pamela A F Madden; Angela Tam; Richard Moore; Martin Hirst; Marco A Marra; Baoxue Zhang; Joseph F Costello; Ting Wang
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2013-06-26       Impact factor: 9.043

9.  Epigenetic memory at embryonic enhancers identified in DNA methylation maps from adult mouse tissues.

Authors:  Gary C Hon; Nisha Rajagopal; Yin Shen; David F McCleary; Feng Yue; My D Dang; Bing Ren
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2013-09-01       Impact factor: 38.330

10.  DNA hypomethylation within specific transposable element families associates with tissue-specific enhancer landscape.

Authors:  Mingchao Xie; Chibo Hong; Bo Zhang; Rebecca F Lowdon; Xiaoyun Xing; Daofeng Li; Xin Zhou; Hyung Joo Lee; Cecile L Maire; Keith L Ligon; Philippe Gascard; Mahvash Sigaroudinia; Thea D Tlsty; Theresa Kadlecek; Arthur Weiss; Henriette O'Geen; Peggy J Farnham; Pamela A F Madden; Andrew J Mungall; Angela Tam; Baljit Kamoh; Stephanie Cho; Richard Moore; Martin Hirst; Marco A Marra; Joseph F Costello; Ting Wang
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2013-05-26       Impact factor: 38.330

View more
  7 in total

1.  Translational Opportunities for Microfluidic Technologies to Enable Precision Epigenomics.

Authors:  Yi Xu; Steven R Doonan; Tamas Ordog; Ryan C Bailey
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2020-06-04       Impact factor: 6.986

2.  Epigenetic Therapies in Ovarian Cancer Alter Repetitive Element Expression in a TP53-Dependent Manner.

Authors:  James I McDonald; Noor Diab; Elisa Arthofer; Melissa Hadley; Tomas Kanholm; Uzma Rentia; Stephanie Gomez; Angela Yu; Erin E Grundy; Olivia Cox; Michael J Topper; Xiaoyun Xing; Pamela L Strissel; Reiner Strick; Ting Wang; Stephen B Baylin; Katherine B Chiappinelli
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2021-08-25       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 3.  Plant DNA Methylation Responds to Nutrient Stress.

Authors:  Xiaoru Fan; Lirun Peng; Yong Zhang
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-31       Impact factor: 4.141

Review 4.  Computational methods and next-generation sequencing approaches to analyze epigenetics data: Profiling of methods and applications.

Authors:  Itika Arora; Trygve O Tollefsbol
Journal:  Methods       Date:  2020-09-14       Impact factor: 3.608

Review 5.  DNA methylation methods: Global DNA methylation and methylomic analyses.

Authors:  Shizhao Li; Trygve O Tollefsbol
Journal:  Methods       Date:  2020-10-09       Impact factor: 3.608

Review 6.  Epigenetic Regulation of miRNA Expression in Malignant Mesothelioma: miRNAs as Biomarkers of Early Diagnosis and Therapy.

Authors:  Marco Tomasetti; Simona Gaetani; Federica Monaco; Jiri Neuzil; Lory Santarelli
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2019-11-29       Impact factor: 6.244

Review 7.  Feasible strategies for studying the involvement of DNA methylation and histone acetylation in the stress-induced formation of quality-related metabolites in tea (Camellia sinensis).

Authors:  Jie Yang; Dachuan Gu; Shuhua Wu; Xiaochen Zhou; Jiaming Chen; Yinyin Liao; Lanting Zeng; Ziyin Yang
Journal:  Hortic Res       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 6.793

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.