Literature DB >> 29224057

Identifying factors associated with need for flexible ureteroscope repair: a Western Endourology STone (WEST) research consortium prospective cohort study.

Kazumi Taguchi1,2, Jonathan D Harper3, Marshall L Stoller1, Brian D Duty4, Mathew D Sorensen3,5, Roger L Sur6, Manint Usawachintachit1,7, David T Tzou1, David L Wenzler6, Dylan Isaacson8, Angela Xu1, Carissa Chu1, Uwais B Zaid1, Eric R Taylor1, Krishna Ramaswamy1, Thomas Chi9.   

Abstract

Maintenance of flexible ureteroscopes can involve high costs and administrative burden. Instrument fragility necessitates eventual repair, rendering scopes inaccessible during refurbishment. We conducted a multi-institutional prospective cohort study to identify perioperative factors influencing flexible ureteroscope durability. Patients undergoing flexible ureteroscopy (URS) at six United States endourology centers were enrolled between August 2014 and June 2015. Surgeon self-reported concern and satisfaction with scope performance as well as upward and downward angles of deflection for each scope tip were measured before and after each procedure. The need for scope repair was determined by the operating surgeon at the time of the procedure and recorded. 424 URS cases using 74 flexible ureteroscopes were identified. Scope repair was required in 28 cases (6.6%) involving 26 scopes (35.1%). Upon univariate analysis, shorter patient height, absence of guidewire use, presence of a ureteral access sheath (UAS), longer procedure time, larger stone size, lithotrite type, surgeon training level, and self-reported concern were associated with scope repair. Upon multivariate analysis, UAS use (OR = 2.53, p = 0.005) and degree loss of scope upward flexion during a case (OR = 1.02, p = 0.03) increased the odds of a scope needing repair while the use of safety guidewire decreased the odds of a scope repair (OR = 0.50, p = 0.045). Lithotrite use and surgeon concern were associated with degree loss of scope upward flexion. The use of a UAS, absence of a safety guidewire, and the loss of upward ureteroscope flexion should be considered when evaluating means of optimizing reusable ureteroscope durability.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Durability; Reusable flexible ureteroscope; Scope repair; Ureteral access sheath; Ureteroscopy

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29224057     DOI: 10.1007/s00240-017-1013-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urolithiasis        ISSN: 2194-7228            Impact factor:   3.436


  20 in total

1.  Flexible ureteroscopes: a single center evaluation of the durability and function of the new endoscopes smaller than 9Fr.

Authors:  J S Afane; E O Olweny; E Bercowsky; C P Sundaram; M D Dunn; A L Shalhav; E M McDougall; R V Clayman
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 7.450

2.  Cost Analysis of Flexible Ureteroscope Repairs: Evaluation of 655 Procedures in a Community-Based Practice.

Authors:  Eugene Kramolowsky; Zachary McDowell; Blake Moore; Brigette Booth; Nada Wood
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2015-12-14       Impact factor: 2.942

Review 3.  Independent analysis of Olympus flexible ureteroscope repairs.

Authors:  Benjamin K Canales; Joseph M Gleason; Nathan Hicks; Manoj Monga
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 2.649

4.  Ureteroscope cleaning and sterilization by the urology operating room team: the effect on repair costs.

Authors:  Michelle Jo Semins; Susanna George; Mohamad E Allaf; Brian R Matlaga
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 2.942

5.  Research electronic data capture (REDCap)--a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support.

Authors:  Paul A Harris; Robert Taylor; Robert Thielke; Jonathon Payne; Nathaniel Gonzalez; Jose G Conde
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2008-09-30       Impact factor: 6.317

6.  Improving the durability of digital flexible ureteroscopes.

Authors:  Theocharis Karaolides; Christian Bach; Stefanos Kachrilas; Anuj Goyal; Junaid Masood; Noor Buchholz
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2013-03-07       Impact factor: 2.649

7.  Techniques to maximize flexible ureteroscope longevity.

Authors:  Paul K Pietrow; Brian K Auge; Fernando C Delvecchio; Ari D Silverstein; Alon Z Weizer; David M Albala; Glenn M Preminger
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 2.649

Review 8.  Use of ureteral access sheaths in ureteroscopy.

Authors:  Adam G Kaplan; Michael E Lipkin; Charles D Scales; Glenn M Preminger
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2015-11-24       Impact factor: 14.432

9.  Durability of the next-generation flexible fiberoptic ureteroscopes: a randomized prospective multi-institutional clinical trial.

Authors:  Bodo Knudsen; Ricardo Miyaoka; Ketul Shah; Timothy Holden; Thomas M T Turk; Renato N Pedro; Carly Kriedberg; Bryan Hinck; Omar Ortiz-Alvarado; Manoj Monga
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2009-10-24       Impact factor: 2.649

10.  The clinical research office of the endourological society ureteroscopy global study: indications, complications, and outcomes in 11,885 patients.

Authors:  Jean de la Rosette; John Denstedt; Petrisor Geavlete; Francis Keeley; Tadashi Matsuda; Margaret Pearle; Glenn Preminger; Olivier Traxer
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2013-12-17       Impact factor: 2.942

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  Reusable flexible ureterorenoscopes are more cost-effective than single-use scopes: results of a systematic review from PETRA Uro-group.

Authors:  Michele Talso; Ioannis K Goumas; Guido M Kamphuis; Laurian Dragos; Tzevat Tefik; Olivier Traxer; Bhaskar K Somani
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2019-09

2.  Single-Port Percutaneous Nephroscopy combined with GreenLight Laser in Simple Renal Cyst.

Authors:  Wen-Zeng Yang; Yun-Fei Sun; Zhen-Yu Cui; Tao Ma
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2020 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.088

3.  LithoVue™ for renal stone therapy - a perfect fit for high volume academic centers; a retrospective evaluation of 108 cases.

Authors:  Maximilian Pallauf; Sabina Sevcenco; Christopher Steiner; Martin Drerup; Michael Mitterberger; Daniela Colleselli; Lukas Lusuardi; Thomas Kunit
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2020-05-18       Impact factor: 2.264

4.  Impact of case volume per year on flexible Ureteroscopy practice: an internet based survey.

Authors:  Omar Alhunaidi; Abdulrahman A Ahmad; Ahmed R El-Nahas; Bader Akroof; Ali Alamiri; Feras Al-Ajrawi; Abdullatif Al-Terki; Mohamed El-Shazly
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2019-12-18       Impact factor: 2.264

5.  Ultrasonography-assisted flexible ureteroscope for the treatment of parapelvic renal cysts: A comparison between the 1470-nm diode laser and the holmium laser.

Authors:  Yu Chen; Rongjiang Wang; Xufeng Shen; Jianer Tang; Junwen Shen; Zhihai Fang; Zhanqin Shi; Xiaodong Jin
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2020-12-27       Impact factor: 2.447

Review 6.  Repair Rate and Associated Costs of Reusable Flexible Ureteroscopes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Dinah K Rindorf; Thomas Tailly; Guido M Kamphuis; Sara Larsen; Bhaskar K Somani; Olivier Traxer; Kevin Koo
Journal:  Eur Urol Open Sci       Date:  2022-01-29

7.  Rigid ureteroscopic lithotripsy in the lateral decubitus position for upper urinary tract stones.

Authors:  Jinqing Zhang; Binbin Li; Gang Li; Zengshi Yang; Ning Ye; Yihao Liu; Hongbing Zhuo; Jingfan Hong
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2022-02-23       Impact factor: 2.264

8.  Comparative analysis of retrograde intrarenal surgery and modified ultra-mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy in management of lower pole renal stones (1.5-3.5 cm).

Authors:  Zhuohang Li; Cong Lai; Arvind K Shah; Weibin Xie; Cheng Liu; Li Huang; Kuiqing Li; Hao Yu; Kewei Xu
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2020-03-16       Impact factor: 2.264

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.