Literature DB >> 29223866

Phase delays between tone pairs reveal interactions in scalp-recorded envelope following responses.

Vijayalakshmi Easwar1, Ashlee Banyard2, Steven Aiken3, David Purcell4.   

Abstract

Evoked potentials to envelope periodicity in sounds, such as vowels, are dependent on the stimulus spectrum. We hypothesize that phase differences between responses elicited by multiple frequencies spread tonotopically across the cochlear partition may contribute to variation in scalp-recorded amplitude. The present study evaluated this hypothesis by measuring envelope following responses (EFRs) to two concurrent tone pairs, p1 and p2, that approximated the first and second formant frequencies of a vowel, while controlling their relative envelope phase. We found that the scalp-recorded amplitude of EFRs changed significantly in phase and amplitude when the envelope phase of p2, the higher frequency tone pair, was delayed. The maximum EFR amplitude occurred at the p2 envelope phase delay of 90°, likely because the stimulus delay compensated for the average phase lead of 73.57° exhibited by p2-contributed EFRs relative to p1-contributed EFRs, owing to earlier cochlear processing of higher frequencies. Findings suggest a linear superimposition of independently generated EFRs from tonotopically separated pathways. This suggests that introducing frequency-specific delays may help to optimize EFRs to broadband stimuli like vowels.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Auditory steady-state response; Vowel simulation

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29223866     DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2017.12.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosci Lett        ISSN: 0304-3940            Impact factor:   3.046


  5 in total

1.  The Accuracy of Envelope Following Responses in Predicting Speech Audibility.

Authors:  Vijayalakshmi Easwar; Jen Birstler; Adrienne Harrison; Susan Scollie; David Purcell
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2020 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

2.  Frequency following responses to tone glides: Effects of frequency extent, direction, and electrode montage.

Authors:  Curtis J Billings; William J Bologna; Ramesh Kumar Muralimanohar; Brandon M Madsen; Michelle R Molis
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2019-01-23       Impact factor: 3.208

3.  Assessing Cochlear-Place Specific Temporal Coding Using Multi-Band Complex Tones to Measure Envelope-Following Responses.

Authors:  Le Wang; Hari Bharadwaj; Barbara Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2019-03-01       Impact factor: 3.590

4.  Chirp Analyzer for Estimating Amplitude and Latency of Steady-State Auditory Envelope Following Responses.

Authors:  Eduardo Martinez-Montes; Yalina Garcia-Puente; Matias Zanartu; Pavel Prado-Gutierrez
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2021-01-28       Impact factor: 3.802

5.  The Influence of Sensation Level on Speech-Evoked Envelope Following Responses.

Authors:  Vijayalakshmi Easwar; Jen Birstler; Adrienne Harrison; Susan Scollie; David Purcell
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2022 Jan/Feb       Impact factor: 3.562

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.