Literature DB >> 29223745

Buparlisib plus fulvestrant in postmenopausal women with hormone-receptor-positive, HER2-negative, advanced breast cancer progressing on or after mTOR inhibition (BELLE-3): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial.

Angelo Di Leo1, Stephen Johnston2, Keun Seok Lee3, Eva Ciruelos4, Per E Lønning5, Wolfgang Janni6, Ruth O'Regan7, Marie-Ange Mouret-Reynier8, Dimitar Kalev9, Daniel Egle10, Tibor Csőszi11, Roberto Bordonaro12, Thomas Decker13, Vivianne C G Tjan-Heijnen14, Sibel Blau15, Alessio Schirone16, Denis Weber17, Mona El-Hashimy18, Bharani Dharan18, Dalila Sellami18, Thomas Bachelot19.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Activation of the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway occurs frequently in breast cancer that is resistant to endocrine therapy. Approved mTOR inhibitors effectively inhibit cell growth and proliferation but elicit AKT phosphorylation via a feedback activation pathway, potentially leading to resistance to mTOR inhibitors. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of buparlisib plus fulvestrant in patients with advanced breast cancer who were pretreated with endocrine therapy and mTOR inhibitors.
METHODS: BELLE-3 was a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre, phase 3 study. Postmenopausal women aged 18 years or older with histologically or cytologically confirmed hormone-receptor-positive, HER2-negative, locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer, who had relapsed on or after endocrine therapy and mTOR inhibitors, were recruited from 200 trial centres in 22 countries. Eligible patients were randomly assigned (2:1) via interactive response technology (block size of six) to receive oral buparlisib (100 mg per day) or matching placebo starting on day 1 of cycle 1, plus intramuscular fulvestrant (500 mg) on days 1 and 15 of cycle 1 and on day 1 of subsequent 28-day cycles. Randomisation was stratified by visceral disease status. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival by local investigator assessment as per the Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1 in the full analysis population (all randomised patients, by intention-to-treat). Safety was analysed in all patients who received at least one dose of treatment and at least one post-baseline safety assessment. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01633060, and is ongoing but no longer enrolling patients.
FINDINGS: Between Jan 15, 2013, and March 31, 2016, 432 patients were randomly assigned to the buparlisib (n=289) or placebo (n=143) groups. Median progression-free survival was significantly longer in the buparlisib versus placebo group (3·9 months [95% CI 2·8-4·2] vs 1·8 months [1·5-2·8]; hazard ratio [HR] 0·67, 95% CI 0·53-0·84, one-sided p=0·00030). The most frequent grade 3-4 adverse events in the buparlisib versus placebo group were elevated alanine aminotransferase (63 [22%] of 288 patients vs four [3%] of 140), elevated aspartate aminotransferase (51 [18%] vs four [3%]), hyperglycaemia (35 [12%] vs none), hypertension (16 [6%] vs six [4%]), and fatigue (ten [3%] vs two [1%]). Serious adverse events were reported in 64 (22%) of 288 patients in the buparlisib group versus 23 (16%) of 140 in the placebo group; the most frequent serious adverse events (affecting ≥2% of patients) were elevated aspartate aminotransferase (six [2%] vs none), dyspnoea (six [2%] vs one [1%]), and pleural effusion (six [2%] vs none). On-treatment deaths occurred in ten (3%) of 288 patients in the buparlisib group and in six (4%) of 140 in the placebo group; most deaths were due to metastatic breast cancer, and two were considered treatment-related (cardiac failure [n=1] in the buparlisib group and unknown reason [n=1] in the placebo group).
INTERPRETATION: The safety profile of buparlisib plus fulvestrant does not support its further development in this setting. Nonetheless, the efficacy of buparlisib supports the rationale for the use of PI3K inhibitors plus endocrine therapy in patients with PIK3CA mutations. FUNDING: Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29223745     DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30688-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet Oncol        ISSN: 1470-2045            Impact factor:   41.316


  124 in total

1.  Cooperative Effect of Oncogenic MET and PIK3CA in an HGF-Dominant Environment in Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Shuying Liu; Shunqiang Li; Bailiang Wang; Wenbin Liu; Mihai Gagea; Huiqin Chen; Joohyuk Sohn; Napa Parinyanitikul; Tina Primeau; Kim-Anh Do; George F Vande Woude; John Mendelsohn; Naoto T Ueno; Gordon B Mills; Debu Tripathy; Ana M Gonzalez-Angulo
Journal:  Mol Cancer Ther       Date:  2018-12-05       Impact factor: 6.261

Review 2.  Liquid Biopsy to Identify Actionable Genomic Alterations.

Authors:  Sai-Hong Ignatius Ou; Misako Nagasaka; Viola W Zhu
Journal:  Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book       Date:  2018-05-23

3.  Nuclease-Assisted Minor Allele Enrichment Using Overlapping Probes-Assisted Amplification-Refractory Mutation System: An Approach for the Improvement of Amplification-Refractory Mutation System-Polymerase Chain Reaction Specificity in Liquid Biopsies.

Authors:  Athina Markou; Elena Tzanikou; Ioannis Ladas; G Mike Makrigiorgos; Evi Lianidou
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2019-10-03       Impact factor: 6.986

4.  Double PIK3CA mutations in cis increase oncogenicity and sensitivity to PI3Kα inhibitors.

Authors:  Pedram Razavi; Jared L Johnson; Hong Shao; Neil Vasan; Hardik Shah; Alesia Antoine; Erik Ladewig; Alexander Gorelick; Ting-Yu Lin; Eneda Toska; Guotai Xu; Abiha Kazmi; Matthew T Chang; Barry S Taylor; Maura N Dickler; Komal Jhaveri; Sarat Chandarlapaty; Raul Rabadan; Ed Reznik; Melissa L Smith; Robert Sebra; Frauke Schimmoller; Timothy R Wilson; Lori S Friedman; Lewis C Cantley; Maurizio Scaltriti; José Baselga
Journal:  Science       Date:  2019-11-08       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Estrogen Down-regulator Fulvestrant Potentiates Antitumor Activity of Fluoropyrimidine in Estrogen-responsive MCF-7 Human Breast Cancer Cells.

Authors:  Mamoru Nukatsuka; Hitoshi Saito; Shinzaburo Noguchi; Teiji Takechi
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2019 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.155

Review 6.  Mechanisms of resistance to estrogen receptor modulators in ER+/HER2- advanced breast cancer.

Authors:  Jin Zhang; Qianying Wang; Qing Wang; Jiangran Cao; Jiafu Sun; Zhengmao Zhu
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2019-08-30       Impact factor: 9.261

7.  Luminal Metastatic Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Jens Huober; Rupert Bartsch; Frederik Marmé; Olivia Pagani; Christoph Thomssen
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2019-04-09       Impact factor: 2.860

Review 8.  Advances in Endocrine-Based Therapies for Estrogen Receptor-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Vassilis Aggelis; Stephen R D Johnston
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 9.  The Role of PI3K Inhibition in Lymphoid Malignancies.

Authors:  Gottfried von Keudell; Alison J Moskowitz
Journal:  Curr Hematol Malig Rep       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 3.952

Review 10.  ER+ metastatic breast cancer: past, present, and a prescription for an apoptosis-targeted future.

Authors:  Brett Rozeboom; Nandini Dey; Pradip De
Journal:  Am J Cancer Res       Date:  2019-12-01       Impact factor: 6.166

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.