Suzanne J Baron1, Suzanne V Arnold1, Matthew R Reynolds2, Kaijun Wang1, Michael Deeb3, Michael J Reardon4, James Hermiller5, Steven J Yakubov6, David H Adams7, Jeffrey J Popma8, David J Cohen9. 1. Saint Luke's Mid America Heart Institute, University of Missouri-Kansas City, Kansas City, MO. 2. The Baim Institute, Boston, Massachusetts and Lahey Hospital and Medical Center, Burlington, MA. 3. University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI. 4. Houston-Methodist-DeBakey Heart and Vascular Center, Houston, TX. 5. St. Vincent Medical Group, Indianapolis, IN. 6. OhioHealth Heart and Vascular Physicians, Columbus, OH. 7. Mount Sinai Hospital, New York City, NY. 8. Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA. 9. Saint Luke's Mid America Heart Institute, University of Missouri-Kansas City, Kansas City, MO. Electronic address: dcohen@saint-lukes.org.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: For patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) at extreme surgical risk, transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) leads to improved survival and health status when compared with medical therapy. Whether the early health status benefits of TAVR in these patients are sustained beyond 1 year of follow-up is unknown. METHODS AND RESULTS: Six hundred thirty-nine patients with severe AS at extreme surgical risk underwent TAVR in the CoreValve US Extreme Risk Pivotal trial. Health status was evaluated at baseline and at 1, 6, 12, 24, and 36 months using the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ), the Short-Form-12, and the EuroQoL-5D. Analyses were performed using pattern mixture models to account for both death and missing data and were stratified by iliofemoral (IF) and non-iliofemoral (non-IF) access. After TAVR, there was substantial health status improvement in disease-specific and generic scales by 6 to 12 months. Although there were small declines in health status after 12 months, the initial benefits of TAVR were largely sustained through 3 years for both IF and non-IF cohorts (change from baseline in KCCQ Overall Summary score 19.0 points in IF patients and 14.9 points in non-IF patients; P<.01 for both comparisons). Among surviving patients, clinically meaningful (≥10 point) improvements in the KCCQ Overall Summary Score at 3 years were observed in 85.0% and 83.4% of IF and non-IF patients respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Among extreme risk patients with severe AS, TAVR resulted in large initial health status benefits that were sustained through 3-year follow-up. Although late mortality was high in this population, these findings demonstrate that TAVR offers substantial and durable health status improvements for surviving patients.
BACKGROUND: For patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) at extreme surgical risk, transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) leads to improved survival and health status when compared with medical therapy. Whether the early health status benefits of TAVR in these patients are sustained beyond 1 year of follow-up is unknown. METHODS AND RESULTS: Six hundred thirty-nine patients with severe AS at extreme surgical risk underwent TAVR in the CoreValve US Extreme Risk Pivotal trial. Health status was evaluated at baseline and at 1, 6, 12, 24, and 36 months using the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ), the Short-Form-12, and the EuroQoL-5D. Analyses were performed using pattern mixture models to account for both death and missing data and were stratified by iliofemoral (IF) and non-iliofemoral (non-IF) access. After TAVR, there was substantial health status improvement in disease-specific and generic scales by 6 to 12 months. Although there were small declines in health status after 12 months, the initial benefits of TAVR were largely sustained through 3 years for both IF and non-IF cohorts (change from baseline in KCCQ Overall Summary score 19.0 points in IF patients and 14.9 points in non-IF patients; P<.01 for both comparisons). Among surviving patients, clinically meaningful (≥10 point) improvements in the KCCQ Overall Summary Score at 3 years were observed in 85.0% and 83.4% of IF and non-IF patients respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Among extreme risk patients with severe AS, TAVR resulted in large initial health status benefits that were sustained through 3-year follow-up. Although late mortality was high in this population, these findings demonstrate that TAVR offers substantial and durable health status improvements for surviving patients.
Authors: Martin B Leon; Craig R Smith; Michael Mack; D Craig Miller; Jeffrey W Moses; Lars G Svensson; E Murat Tuzcu; John G Webb; Gregory P Fontana; Raj R Makkar; David L Brown; Peter C Block; Robert A Guyton; Augusto D Pichard; Joseph E Bavaria; Howard C Herrmann; Pamela S Douglas; John L Petersen; Jodi J Akin; William N Anderson; Duolao Wang; Stuart Pocock Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2010-09-22 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Raj R Makkar; Gregory P Fontana; Hasan Jilaihawi; Samir Kapadia; Augusto D Pichard; Pamela S Douglas; Vinod H Thourani; Vasilis C Babaliaros; John G Webb; Howard C Herrmann; Joseph E Bavaria; Susheel Kodali; David L Brown; Bruce Bowers; Todd M Dewey; Lars G Svensson; Murat Tuzcu; Jeffrey W Moses; Matthew R Williams; Robert J Siegel; Jodi J Akin; William N Anderson; Stuart Pocock; Craig R Smith; Martin B Leon Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2012-03-26 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Matthew R Reynolds; Elizabeth A Magnuson; Kaijun Wang; Vinod H Thourani; Mathew Williams; Alan Zajarias; Charanjit S Rihal; David L Brown; Craig R Smith; Martin B Leon; David J Cohen Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2012-07-18 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Samir R Kapadia; Martin B Leon; Raj R Makkar; E Murat Tuzcu; Lars G Svensson; Susheel Kodali; John G Webb; Michael J Mack; Pamela S Douglas; Vinod H Thourani; Vasilis C Babaliaros; Howard C Herrmann; Wilson Y Szeto; Augusto D Pichard; Mathew R Williams; Gregory P Fontana; D Craig Miller; William N Anderson; Jodi J Akin; Michael J Davidson; Craig R Smith Journal: Lancet Date: 2015-03-15 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: R Gurvitch; D A Wood; E L Tay; J Leipsic; J Ye; S V Lichtenstein; C R Thompson; R G Carere; N Wijesinghe; F Nietlispach; R H Boone; S Lauck; A Cheung; J G Webb Journal: Circulation Date: 2010-09-13 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Ruben L Osnabrugge; Suzanne V Arnold; Matthew R Reynolds; Elizabeth A Magnuson; Kaijun Wang; Vincent A Gaudiani; Robert C Stoler; Thomas A Burdon; Neal Kleiman; Michael J Reardon; David H Adams; Jeffrey J Popma; David J Cohen Journal: JACC Cardiovasc Interv Date: 2015-02 Impact factor: 11.195
Authors: Wendy J Post; Ciska Buijs; Ronald P Stolk; Elisabeth G E de Vries; Saskia le Cessie Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2009-12-30 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Merrill Thomas; Yevgeniy Khariton; Gregg C Fonarow; Suzanne V Arnold; Larry Hill; Michael E Nassif; Puza P Sharma; Javed Butler; Laine Thomas; Carol I Duffy; Adam D DeVore; Adrian Hernandez; Nancy M Albert; J Herbert Patterson; Fredonia B Williams; Kevin McCague; John A Spertus Journal: JACC Heart Fail Date: 2019-06-05 Impact factor: 12.035
Authors: Suzanne V Arnold; Yiran Zhang; Suzanne J Baron; Thomas C McAndrew; Maria C Alu; Susheel K Kodali; Samir Kapadia; Vinod H Thourani; D Craig Miller; Michael J Mack; Martin B Leon; David J Cohen Journal: JACC Cardiovasc Interv Date: 2019-02-25 Impact factor: 11.195
Authors: Jun-Hyok Oh; Yuhei Kobayashi; Guson Kang; Takeshi Nishi; Martin J Willemink; William F Fearon; Michael Fischbein; Dominik Fleishmann; Alan C Yeung; Juyong Brian Kim Journal: Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc Date: 2021-11-30