Literature DB >> 29221736

Differential effects of operative complications on survival after surgery for primary lung cancer.

Felix G Fernandez1, Andrzej S Kosinski2, Anthony P Furnary3, Mark Onaitis4, Sunghee Kim2, Robert H Habib5, Betty C Tong6, Patricia Cowper2, Daniel Boffa7, Jeffrey P Jacobs8, Cameron D Wright9, Joe B Putnam10.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Complications adversely affect survival after lung cancer surgery. We tested the hypothesis that effects of complications after lung cancer surgery on survival vary substantially across the spectrum of postoperative complications.
METHODS: The Society of Thoracic Surgeons General Thoracic Surgery Database was linked to Medicare data for lung cancer resections from 2002 through 2013. Linkage was achieved for 29,899 patients. A survival model was created that included operative complications as explanatory variables and adjusted for relevant baseline covariates. Because of violation of the proportional hazard assumption, we used time-varying coefficient Cox modeling for the complication variables.
RESULTS: Median patient age was 73 years, and 48% were male. Procedures performed were lobectomy in 69%, wedge in 17%, segmentectomy in 7%, bilobectomy in 3%, pneumonectomy in 3%, and sleeve lobectomy in 1%. Most frequent complications were atrial arrhythmia (14%), pneumonia (4.3%), reintubation (3.8%), delirium (2%), and acute kidney injury (1.4%). In the early period (0-90 days), 12 complications are associated with worse survival. From 3 to 18 months after surgery, only 4 complications are associated with survival: delirium, blood transfusion, reintubation, and pneumonia. After 18 months, only sepsis and blood transfusion are associated with a significant late hazard.
CONCLUSIONS: Our analysis confirmed the presence of differential magnitude and time-varying effects on survival of individual complications after lung cancer surgery. We conclude that the derived time-dependent hazard ratios can serve as objective weights in future models that enhance performance measurement and focus attention on prevention and management of complications with greatest effects.
Copyright © 2017 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  lung cancer surgery

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29221736     DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2017.09.149

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg        ISSN: 0022-5223            Impact factor:   5.209


  10 in total

1.  Discrepancy in the perception of symptoms among patients and healthcare providers after lung cancer surgery.

Authors:  Xing Wei; Hongfan Yu; Wei Dai; Wei Xu; Qingsong Yu; Yang Pu; Yaqin Wang; Jia Liao; Qiang Li; Qiuling Shi
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2021-08-27       Impact factor: 3.603

2.  Short-Term Outcomes of Tracheal Resection in The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Database.

Authors:  Bryan Payne Stanifer; Adin-Cristian Andrei; Menghan Liu; Shari L Meyerson; Ankit Bharat; David D Odell; Malcolm M DeCamp
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2018-09-19       Impact factor: 4.330

3.  LncRNA HCP5 Stimulates the Proliferation of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Cells by Up-Regulating Survivin Through the Down-Regulation of miR-320.

Authors:  Chao Li; Zhang Lei; Bin Peng; Jiang Zhu; Li Chen
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2020-02-14       Impact factor: 3.989

4.  Prognostic Factors Determining Survival of Patients Operated for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer with Consideration Given to Morphological Parameters of Blood.

Authors:  Mariusz Łochowski; Barbara Łochowska; Justyna Chałubińska-Fendler; Izabela Zawadzka; Marek Rębowski; Józef Kozak
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2021-01-18       Impact factor: 3.989

5.  Intercostal nerve blockade with liposomal bupivacaine reduces length of stay after video assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) lobectomy.

Authors:  Kian Banks; Sora Ely; Diana S Hsu; Dana A Dominguez; Rebecca C Gologorsky; Julia Wei; Clara Maxim; Simon K Ashiku; Ashish R Patel; Jeffrey B Velotta
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2022-01       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 6.  A brief overview of thoracic surgery in the United States.

Authors:  Catherine T Byrd; Kiah M Williams; Leah M Backhus
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2022-01       Impact factor: 3.005

7.  Radiological unilateral pleuroparenchymal fibroelastosis as a notable late complication after lung cancer surgery: incidence and perioperative associated factors.

Authors:  Kenji Inafuku; Akimasa Sekine; Hiromasa Arai; Eri Hagiwara; Shigeru Komatsu; Tae Iwasawa; Toshihiro Misumi; Noritake Kikunishi; Michihiko Tajiri; Koji Okudela; Yasushi Rino; Takashi Ogura
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2022-09-09

8.  Worse outcomes after conversion of thoracoscopic lobectomy for lung cancer.

Authors:  Piotr Gabryel; Cezary Piwkowski; Mariusz Kasprzyk; Paweł Zieliński; Magdalena Roszak; Wojciech Dyszkiewicz
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2021-04-08

Review 9.  Red blood cell transfusions and the survival in patients with cancer undergoing curative surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Fausto Petrelli; Michele Ghidini; Antonio Ghidini; Giovanni Sgroi; Ivano Vavassori; Daniela Petrò; Mary Cabiddu; Alberto Aiolfi; Gianluca Bonitta; Alberto Zaniboni; Emanuele Rausa
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2021-01-03       Impact factor: 2.549

10.  Clinical Significance of Acute Kidney Injury in Lung Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Semin Cho; Eunjeong Kang; Ji Eun Kim; U Kang; Hee Gyung Kang; Minsu Park; Kwangsoo Kim; Dong Ki Kim; Kwon Wook Joo; Yon Su Kim; Hyung-Jin Yoon; Hajeong Lee
Journal:  Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2021-01-18       Impact factor: 4.679

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.