Literature DB >> 29221298

The Redax® Coaxial Drain in pulmonary lobectomy: a study of efficacy.

Ottavio Rena1, Sara Parini1, Esther Papalia1, Fabio Massera1, Davide Turello1, Guido Baietto1, Caterina Casadio1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Pleural drainage is required after pulmonary lobectomy to evacuate air-leak and fluid. We compared the performance of the new Redax® Coaxial Drain (CD) (Redax, Mirandola, Italy) with a standard chest tube (CT) in terms of fluid and air-leak evacuation.
METHODS: Fifty-two patients receiving a 24-F CD under water-seal after pulmonary lobectomy through open surgery or video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) were matched according to demographic, clinical and pathological variables with 104 patients receiving a 24-F CT. Fluid evacuation and post-operative day 0 (POD0) fluid evacuation rate, air-leak rate, tension pneumothorax or increasing subcutaneous emphysema, tube occlusion at removal, visual analog scale (VAS) score at rest and during cough, chest drain duration, pleural fluid accumulation or residual pleural cavity after tube removal, post-operative morbidity and mortality rate were recorded and compared between the two groups.
RESULTS: No differences were recorded in post-operative morbidity and mortality rates. Fluid drainage rates on POD0 were significantly higher in CD group (73% vs. 48%; P=0.004); air-leak occurrence was similar in both groups and no differences were recorded in terms of tension pneumothorax or increasing subcutaneous emphysema rates; VAS score was lower for CD when compared with CT and it reached significant difference in the subgroups of patients operated on by VATS; no cases of occlusion at removal were recorded in CD patient.
CONCLUSIONS: Redax® CD is safe and efficient in air-leak and fluid evacuation; due to its design and constituting material it is superior to standard CTs in terms of fluid evacuation rate and patient post-operative comfort.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Thoracic surgery; air-leak; chest drain; pleural effusion; pulmonary lobectomy

Year:  2017        PMID: 29221298      PMCID: PMC5708375          DOI: 10.21037/jtd.2017.08.110

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Dis        ISSN: 2072-1439            Impact factor:   2.895


  12 in total

1.  [Comparison study on the use of tubular and spiral thoracic drains following lung resections. A prospective study].

Authors:  A J Stolz; R Lischke; J Simonek; J Schützner; P Pafko
Journal:  Rozhl Chir       Date:  2005-11

2.  The use of flexible silastic drains after chest surgery: novel thoracic drainage.

Authors:  Hisashi Ishikura; Suguru Kimura
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 4.330

3.  Comparison of the single or double chest tube applications after pulmonary lobectomies.

Authors:  Erdal Okur; Volkan Baysungur; Cagatay Tezel; Gokcen Sevilgen; Gokhan Ergene; Mertol Gokce; Semih Halezeroglu
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2008-10-16       Impact factor: 4.191

4.  Video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy using a standardized three-port anterior approach - The Copenhagen experience.

Authors:  Henrik J Hansen; René H Petersen
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2012-05

5.  Suction vs water seal after pulmonary resection: a randomized prospective study.

Authors:  M Blair Marshall; Maher E Deeb; Joshua I S Bleier; John C Kucharczuk; Joseph S Friedberg; Larry R Kaiser; Joseph B Shrager
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 9.410

6.  A single 24F Blake drain after wedge resection or lobectomy: a study on 100 consecutive cases.

Authors:  Philippe Icard; Julien Chautard; Xiadong Zhang; Maxime Juanico; Samuel Bichi; Jean-Philippe Lerochais; Frédéric Flais
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2006-08-28       Impact factor: 4.191

7.  Prospective randomized trial compares suction versus water seal for air leaks.

Authors:  R J Cerfolio; C Bass; C R Katholi
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 4.330

8.  The use of flexible spiral drains after non-cardiac thoracic surgery. A clinical study.

Authors:  A Terzi; B Feil; C Bonadiman; A Lonardoni; I Spilimbergo; S Pergher; P Scanagatta; F Calabrò
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 4.191

9.  Use of a single silastic chest drain following thoracotomy: initial evaluation.

Authors:  Nand K Kejriwal; Mark A J Newman
Journal:  ANZ J Surg       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 1.872

10.  The use of Blake drains following general thoracic surgery: is it an acceptable option?

Authors:  Hiroshige Nakamura; Yuji Taniguchi; Ken Miwa; Yoshin Adachi; Shinji Fujioka; Tomohiro Haruki
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2008-10-03
View more
  2 in total

1.  Coaxial Drainage versus Standard Chest Tube after Pulmonary Lobectomy: A Randomized Controlled Study.

Authors:  Massimiliano Bassi; Emilia Mottola; Sara Mantovani; Davide Amore; Andreina Pagini; Daniele Diso; Jacopo Vannucci; Camilla Poggi; Tiziano De Giacomo; Erino Angelo Rendina; Federico Venuta; Marco Anile
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2022-06-22       Impact factor: 3.109

2.  Application of the coaxial smart drain in patients with a large air leak following anatomic lung resection: a prospective multicenter phase II analysis of efficacy and safety.

Authors:  Francesco Guerrera; Pier Luigi Filosso; Cecilia Pompili; Stefania Olivetti; Matteo Roffinella; Andrea Imperatori; Alessandro Brunelli
Journal:  J Vis Surg       Date:  2018-01-29
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.