Adam G Cole1, Ryan David Kennedy2, Ashok Chaurasia1, Scott T Leatherdale1. 1. School of Public Health and Health Systems, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Canada. 2. Institute for Global Tobacco Control, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Within tobacco prevention programming, it is useful to identify youth that are at risk for experimenting with various tobacco products and e-cigarettes. The susceptibility to smoking construct is a simple method to identify never-smoking students that are less committed to remaining smoke-free. However, the predictive validity of this construct has not been tested within the Canadian context or for the use of other tobacco products and e-cigarettes. METHODS: This study used a large, longitudinal sample of secondary school students that reported never using tobacco cigarettes and noncurrent use of alternative tobacco products or e-cigarettes at baseline in Ontario, Canada. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of the susceptibility construct for predicting tobacco cigarette, e-cigarette, cigarillo or little cigar, cigar, hookah, and smokeless tobacco use 1 and 2 years after baseline measurement were calculated. RESULTS: At baseline, 29.4% of the sample was susceptible to future tobacco product or e-cigarette use. The sensitivity of the construct ranged from 43.2% (smokeless tobacco) to 59.5% (tobacco cigarettes), the specificity ranged from 70.9% (smokeless tobacco) to 75.9% (tobacco cigarettes), and the positive predictive value ranged from 2.6% (smokeless tobacco) to 32.2% (tobacco cigarettes). Similar values were calculated for each measure of the susceptibility construct. CONCLUSIONS: A significant number of youth that did not currently use tobacco products or e-cigarettes at baseline reported using tobacco products and e-cigarettes over a 2-year follow-up period. The predictive validity of the susceptibility construct was high and the construct can be used to predict other tobacco product and e-cigarette use among youth. IMPLICATIONS: This study presents the predictive validity of the susceptibility construct for the use of tobacco cigarettes among secondary school students in Ontario, Canada. It also presents a novel use of the susceptibility construct for predicting the use of e-cigarettes, cigarillos or little cigars, cigars, hookah, and smokeless tobacco among secondary school students in Ontario, Canada.
INTRODUCTION: Within tobacco prevention programming, it is useful to identify youth that are at risk for experimenting with various tobacco products and e-cigarettes. The susceptibility to smoking construct is a simple method to identify never-smoking students that are less committed to remaining smoke-free. However, the predictive validity of this construct has not been tested within the Canadian context or for the use of other tobacco products and e-cigarettes. METHODS: This study used a large, longitudinal sample of secondary school students that reported never using tobacco cigarettes and noncurrent use of alternative tobacco products or e-cigarettes at baseline in Ontario, Canada. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of the susceptibility construct for predicting tobacco cigarette, e-cigarette, cigarillo or little cigar, cigar, hookah, and smokeless tobacco use 1 and 2 years after baseline measurement were calculated. RESULTS: At baseline, 29.4% of the sample was susceptible to future tobacco product or e-cigarette use. The sensitivity of the construct ranged from 43.2% (smokeless tobacco) to 59.5% (tobacco cigarettes), the specificity ranged from 70.9% (smokeless tobacco) to 75.9% (tobacco cigarettes), and the positive predictive value ranged from 2.6% (smokeless tobacco) to 32.2% (tobacco cigarettes). Similar values were calculated for each measure of the susceptibility construct. CONCLUSIONS: A significant number of youth that did not currently use tobacco products or e-cigarettes at baseline reported using tobacco products and e-cigarettes over a 2-year follow-up period. The predictive validity of the susceptibility construct was high and the construct can be used to predict other tobacco product and e-cigarette use among youth. IMPLICATIONS: This study presents the predictive validity of the susceptibility construct for the use of tobacco cigarettes among secondary school students in Ontario, Canada. It also presents a novel use of the susceptibility construct for predicting the use of e-cigarettes, cigarillos or little cigars, cigars, hookah, and smokeless tobacco among secondary school students in Ontario, Canada.
Authors: M L Saddleson; L T Kozlowski; G A Giovino; L W Hawk; J M Murphy; M G MacLean; M L Goniewicz; G G Homish; B H Wrotniak; M C Mahoney Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2015-01-24 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Susan C Kaai; K Stephen Brown; Scott T Leatherdale; Stephen R Manske; Donna Murnaghan Journal: Addict Behav Date: 2014-04-21 Impact factor: 3.913
Authors: Charu Mathur; Melissa H Stigler; Darin J Erickson; Cheryl L Perry; John R Finnegan; Monika Arora; K Srinath Reddy Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2013-11-22 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Jessica L Barrington-Trimis; Fei Liu; Jennifer B Unger; Todd Alonzo; Tess Boley Cruz; Robert Urman; Mary Ann Pentz; Kiros Berhane; Rob McConnell Journal: Addict Behav Date: 2019-04-01 Impact factor: 3.913
Authors: Benjamin W Chaffee; Elizabeth T Couch; Janelle Urata; Stuart A Gansky; Gwen Essex; Jing Cheng Journal: Subst Use Misuse Date: 2019-01-29 Impact factor: 2.164
Authors: Joanne Delk; Felicia R Carey; Kathleen R Case; MeLisa R Creamer; Anna V Wilkinson; Cheryl L Perry; Melissa B Harrell Journal: Am J Health Behav Date: 2019-01-01