Literature DB >> 29219020

Correlation of MRI Appearance of Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation in the Ankle with Clinical Outcome.

Keith W Chan1, Richard D Ferkel2, Brian Kern3, Sarah S Chan4, Gregory R Applegate5.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to characterize magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings and correlate with clinical results in patients who underwent autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI) of osteochondral lesions of the talus (OLT).
METHODS: Twenty-four grafts were evaluated at a mean 65.8 months after ACI for OLT. MRI was performed on a 1.5-T GE scanner using multiple sequences. Graft appearance was compared with preoperative MRI and evaluated for 6 criteria: defect fill, surface regularity, signal pattern, bone marrow edema, subchondral plate irregularity, and presence of cystic lesions. Clinical outcome was measured with the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) clinical outcome score.
RESULTS: Of 24 grafts, 22 (92%) demonstrated >75% defect fill. Eighteen (75%) had a mildly irregular and 6 (25%) had a moderately irregular articular surface. The signal pattern of the repair tissue was heterogenous in 23 (96%); 14 (58%) layered and 9 (38%) mottled. Fourteen grafts (58%) showed decreased amount of bone marrow edema while 4 (17%) had no change and 5 (21%) had an increase in the amount of bone marrow edema. The subchondral bone plate was abnormal in most grafts, with focal defects seen in 10, slight depression in 7, and both in 5. Seven had an increase in cystic lesions while the others had no change, decrease or no cysts seen. Mean postoperative AOFAS score was 87.5 with mean improvement of 39.4.
CONCLUSIONS: At 66-month mean follow-up, MRI appearance of the ACI grafts show imaging abnormalities but demonstrate good clinical results. While MRI is an important tool in the postoperative assessment of ACI grafts, the various variations from a normal/nonoperative ankle must be interpreted with caution.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ankle; autologous chondrocyte; diagnostics; grafts; joint involved; magnetic resonance imaging

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 29219020      PMCID: PMC5724669          DOI: 10.1177/1947603516681131

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cartilage        ISSN: 1947-6035            Impact factor:   4.634


  25 in total

1.  Autologous chondrocyte implantation in knee joint: MR imaging and histologic features at 1-year follow-up.

Authors:  Bernhard J Tins; Iain W McCall; Tomoki Takahashi; Victor Cassar-Pullicino; Sally Roberts; Brian Ashton; James Richardson
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2004-12-22       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Matrix-based autologous chondrocyte implantation for cartilage repair: noninvasive monitoring by high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Siegfried Trattnig; Ahmed Ba-Ssalamah; Katja Pinker; Christina Plank; Vilmos Vecsei; Stefan Marlovits
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2005-08-26       Impact factor: 2.546

3.  MR appearance of autologous chondrocyte implantation in the knee: correlation with the knee features and clinical outcome.

Authors:  Tomoki Takahashi; Bernhard Tins; Iain W McCall; James B Richardson; Katsumasa Takagi; Karen Ashton
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2005-11-12       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  Surgical treatment of osteochondral lesions of the talus by open-field autologous chondrocyte implantation: a 10-year follow-up clinical and magnetic resonance imaging T2-mapping evaluation.

Authors:  Sandro Giannini; Milva Battaglia; Roberto Buda; Marco Cavallo; Alberto Ruffilli; Francesca Vannini
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 6.202

5.  Autologous chondrocyte implantation of the ankle: 2- to 10-year results.

Authors:  Steve K Kwak; Brian S Kern; Richard D Ferkel; Keith W Chan; Sina Kasraeian; Gregory R Applegate
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2014-07-23       Impact factor: 6.202

6.  Autologous chondrocyte implantation of the ankle: a 2- to 5-year follow-up.

Authors:  Ellis Kevin Nam; Richard D Ferkel; Gregory R Applegate
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2008-12-22       Impact factor: 6.202

7.  Magnetic resonance imaging appearance of cartilage repair in the knee.

Authors:  Wendy E Brown; Hollis G Potter; Robert G Marx; Thomas L Wickiewicz; Russell F Warren
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Autologous chondrocyte repair of an articular defect in the humeral head.

Authors:  Anthony A Romeo; Brian J Cole; Augustus D Mazzocca; Jeff A Fox; Kevin B Freeman; Edward Joy
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 4.772

9.  Treatment of deep cartilage defects in the knee with autologous chondrocyte transplantation.

Authors:  M Brittberg; A Lindahl; A Nilsson; C Ohlsson; O Isaksson; L Peterson
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1994-10-06       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Definition of pertinent parameters for the evaluation of articular cartilage repair tissue with high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Stefan Marlovits; Gabriele Striessnig; Christoph T Resinger; Silke M Aldrian; Vilmos Vecsei; Herwig Imhof; Siegfried Trattnig
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.528

View more
  2 in total

1.  Efficacy and safety of autologous chondrocyte implantation for osteochondral defects of the talus: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Mu Hu; Xingchen Li; Xiangyang Xu
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2021-06-14       Impact factor: 3.067

2.  High-Density Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation as Treatment for Ankle Osteochondral Defects.

Authors:  Juan Manuel López-Alcorocho; Isabel Guillén-Vicente; Elena Rodríguez-Iñigo; Ramón Navarro; Rosa Caballero-Santos; Marta Guillén-Vicente; Mercedes Casqueiro; Tomás F Fernández-Jaén; Fernando Sanz; Santiago Arauz; Steve Abelow; Pedro Guillén-García
Journal:  Cartilage       Date:  2019-03-17       Impact factor: 4.634

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.