Literature DB >> 16284767

MR appearance of autologous chondrocyte implantation in the knee: correlation with the knee features and clinical outcome.

Tomoki Takahashi1, Bernhard Tins, Iain W McCall, James B Richardson, Katsumasa Takagi, Karen Ashton.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To relate the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) appearance of autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI) in the knee in the 1st postoperative year with other knee features on MRI and with clinical outcome. DESIGN AND METHODS: Forty-nine examinations were performed in 49 patients at 1 year after ACI in the knee. Forty-one preoperative magnetic resonance (MR) examinations were also available. The grafts were assessed for smoothness, thickness in comparison with that of adjacent cartilage, signal intensity, integration to underlying bone and adjacent cartilage, and congruity of subchondral bone. Presence of overgrowth and bone marrow appearance beneath the graft were also assessed. Presence of osteophyte formation, further cartilage defects, appearance of the cruciate ligaments and the menisci were also recorded. An overall graft score was constructed, using the graft appearances. This was correlated with the knee features and the Lysholm score, a clinical self-assessment score. The data were analysed by a Kruskal-Wallis H test followed by a Mann-Whitney U test with Bonferroni correction as post-hoc test.
RESULTS: Of 49 grafts, 32 (65%) demonstrated complete defect filling 1 year postoperatively. General overgrowth was seen in eight grafts (16%), and partial overgrowth in 13 grafts (26%). Bone marrow change underneath the graft was seen; oedema was seen in 23 grafts (47%), cysts in six grafts (12%) and sclerosis in two grafts (4%). Mean graft score was 8.7 (of maximal 12) (95% CI 8.0-9.5). Knees without osteophyte formation or additional other cartilage defects (other than the graft site) had a significantly higher graft score than knees with multiple osteophytes (P=0.0057) or multiple further cartilage defects (P=0.014). At 1 year follow-up improvement in the clinical scores was not significantly different for any subgroup. Knees with a graft score of 8 points or greater had a better improvement of the clinical score than those of 7 points or fewer.
CONCLUSIONS: At 1 year follow-up after ACI, higher graft scores are associated with an overall better preserved knee joint. ACI improves the clinical outcome, but there is no statistically significant correlation of graft score and clinical outcome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16284767     DOI: 10.1007/s00256-005-0002-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Skeletal Radiol        ISSN: 0364-2348            Impact factor:   2.199


  22 in total

Review 1.  Magnetic resonance imaging of autologous chondrocyte implantation.

Authors:  L Alparslan; T Minas; C S Winalski
Journal:  Semin Ultrasound CT MR       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 1.875

2.  Bone marrow edema pattern in osteoarthritic knees: correlation between MR imaging and histologic findings.

Authors:  M Zanetti; E Bruder; J Romero; J Hodler
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Autologous chondrocyte implantation in knee joint: MR imaging and histologic features at 1-year follow-up.

Authors:  Bernhard J Tins; Iain W McCall; Tomoki Takahashi; Victor Cassar-Pullicino; Sally Roberts; Brian Ashton; James Richardson
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2004-12-22       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Autologous chondrocyte implantation of the knee: multicenter experience and minimum 3-year follow-up.

Authors:  L J Micheli; J E Browne; C Erggelet; F Fu; B Mandelbaum; J B Moseley; D Zurakowski
Journal:  Clin J Sport Med       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 3.638

5.  Rating systems in the evaluation of knee ligament injuries.

Authors:  Y Tegner; J Lysholm
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Autologous chondrocyte transplantation. Biomechanics and long-term durability.

Authors:  Lars Peterson; Mats Brittberg; Illka Kiviranta; Evy Lundgren Akerlund; Anders Lindahl
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2002 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 6.202

7.  In vivo reproducibility of three-dimensional cartilage volume and thickness measurements with MR imaging.

Authors:  F Eckstein; J Westhoff; H Sittek; K P Maag; M Haubner; S Faber; K H Englmeier; M Reiser
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 3.959

8.  Two- to 9-year outcome after autologous chondrocyte transplantation of the knee.

Authors:  L Peterson; T Minas; M Brittberg; A Nilsson; E Sjögren-Jansson; A Lindahl
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Autologous chondrocyte implantation for focal chondral defects of the knee.

Authors:  T Minas
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Treatment of deep cartilage defects in the knee with autologous chondrocyte transplantation.

Authors:  M Brittberg; A Lindahl; A Nilsson; C Ohlsson; O Isaksson; L Peterson
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1994-10-06       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  14 in total

1.  Bone marrow edema and results after cartilage repair.

Authors:  Maurilio Marcacci; Luca Andriolo; Elizaveta Kon; Giuseppe Filardo
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2015-06

2.  Matrix-induced autologous chondrocyte implantation of the knee: mid-term and long-term follow-up by MR arthrography.

Authors:  Eugenio Genovese; Mario Ronga; Maria Gloria Angeretti; Raffaele Novario; Anna Leonardi; Mauro Albrizio; Leonardo Callegari; Carlo Fugazzola
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2010-05-06       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 3.  Bone marrow lesions and subchondral bone pathology of the knee.

Authors:  Elizaveta Kon; Mario Ronga; Giuseppe Filardo; Jack Farr; Henning Madry; Giuseppe Milano; Luca Andriolo; Nogah Shabshin
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-04-13       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Is the clinical outcome after cartilage treatment affected by subchondral bone edema?

Authors:  Giuseppe Filardo; Elizaveta Kon; Alessandro Di Martino; Francesco Perdisa; Maurizio Busacca; Francesco Tentoni; Federica Balboni; Maurilio Marcacci
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-12-14       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Bifunctional Labeling of Rabbit Mesenchymal Stem Cells for MR Imaging and Fluorescence Microscopy.

Authors:  Markus T Berninger; Pablo Rodriguez-Gonzalez; Franz Schilling; Bernhard Haller; Thorsten Lichtenstein; Andreas B Imhoff; Ernst J Rummeny; Martina Anton; Stephan Vogt; Tobias D Henning
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 3.488

6.  Correlation of MRI Appearance of Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation in the Ankle with Clinical Outcome.

Authors:  Keith W Chan; Richard D Ferkel; Brian Kern; Sarah S Chan; Gregory R Applegate
Journal:  Cartilage       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 4.634

Review 7.  We do not have evidence based methods for the treatment of cartilage defects in the knee.

Authors:  Jan P Benthien; Manuela Schwaninger; Peter Behrens
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2010-11-18       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  Radiological Assessment of Accelerated versus Traditional Approaches to Postoperative Rehabilitation following Matrix-Induced Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation.

Authors:  Jay R Ebert; Michael Fallon; William B Robertson; David G Lloyd; M H Zheng; David J Wood; Timothy Ackland
Journal:  Cartilage       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 4.634

Review 9.  Cell-based approaches to joint surface repair: a research perspective.

Authors:  A J Roelofs; J P J Rocke; C De Bari
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2013-04-15       Impact factor: 6.576

Review 10.  Clinical application of scaffolds for cartilage tissue engineering.

Authors:  Junji Iwasa; Lars Engebretsen; Yosuke Shima; Mitsuo Ochi
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2008-11-20       Impact factor: 4.342

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.