Scott McIntosh1, Andrew F Wall2, Tye Johnson1, Jordan Kurtzman1, Duncan Ververs1, Deborah J Ossip1. 1. University of Rochester Medical Center, Department of Public Health Sciences, 265 Crittenden Blvd., CU 420644, Rochester, NY 14642-0644. 2. University of Redlands School of Education, University Hall North, 1200 East Colton Avenue, P.O. Box 3080, Redlands, CA 92373.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Tobacco use among United States college-aged students remains higher than that of the national average. While a majority of public health literature has explained smoking programs and policies at traditional four-year colleges and universities, little research exists on programs and policies at two-year community colleges. It is important to understand such efforts at these institutions as they have vastly different infrastructures and enroll a more diverse and at-risk student body compared to traditional four-year colleges. METHODS: The role of community colleges in health efforts aimed at smoking was examined at four community colleges. Qualitative research methods included 18 interviews and four focus groups (N=55), document review, and direct environmental observation. RESULTS: Community colleges offered a limited number of smoking cessation and secondhand smoke prevention initiatives. All colleges provided cessation literature, though additional programming varied by college. Indoor and outdoor smoking policies existed on all campuses though enforcement was problematic. Little evidence was found that current program and policy approaches are based upon best practices or are being employed successfully. CONCLUSIONS: Future tobacco control initiatives at community colleges need to require little infrastructure and minimal staffing, and be low cost. Cessation tools for students must be convenient, understandable, and accessible from multiple locations. Feasible approaches for future initiatives could include testing low cost technology such as Web Assisted Tobacco Interventions (WATI) and outside partnerships with community organizations and health agencies. Policy enforcement could be improved with tobacco policy education at orientation for students, faculty and staff.
INTRODUCTION: Tobacco use among United States college-aged students remains higher than that of the national average. While a majority of public health literature has explained smoking programs and policies at traditional four-year colleges and universities, little research exists on programs and policies at two-year community colleges. It is important to understand such efforts at these institutions as they have vastly different infrastructures and enroll a more diverse and at-risk student body compared to traditional four-year colleges. METHODS: The role of community colleges in health efforts aimed at smoking was examined at four community colleges. Qualitative research methods included 18 interviews and four focus groups (N=55), document review, and direct environmental observation. RESULTS: Community colleges offered a limited number of smoking cessation and secondhand smoke prevention initiatives. All colleges provided cessation literature, though additional programming varied by college. Indoor and outdoor smoking policies existed on all campuses though enforcement was problematic. Little evidence was found that current program and policy approaches are based upon best practices or are being employed successfully. CONCLUSIONS: Future tobacco control initiatives at community colleges need to require little infrastructure and minimal staffing, and be low cost. Cessation tools for students must be convenient, understandable, and accessible from multiple locations. Feasible approaches for future initiatives could include testing low cost technology such as Web Assisted Tobacco Interventions (WATI) and outside partnerships with community organizations and health agencies. Policy enforcement could be improved with tobacco policy education at orientation for students, faculty and staff.
Entities:
Keywords:
Community Colleges; Health Policies; Qualitative Research; Tobacco Control
Authors: Rebecca Murphy-Hoefer; Reba Griffith; Linda L Pederson; Linda Crossett; Shanthalaxmi R Iyer; Marc D Hiller Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2005-02 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Sharon E Cummins; Kiandra K Hebert; Christopher M Anderson; Judith A Mills; Shu-Hong Zhu Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2007-06-28 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Alexander V Prokhorov; Tracey Yost; Mary Mullin-Jones; Carl de Moor; Kentya H Ford; Salma Marani; Briseis A Kilfoy; Joshua P Hein; Karen Suchanek Hudmon; Karen M Emmons Journal: Addict Behav Date: 2007-12-27 Impact factor: 3.913
Authors: Tammy H Sims; Timothy McAfee; David L Fraser; Timothy B Baker; Michael C Fiore; Stevens S Smith Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2012-10-18 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Susan S Smyth; Barry S Coller; Rebecca D Jackson; Philip A Kern; Scott McIntosh; Emma A Meagher; Doris M Rubio; Kathryn Sandberg; Joel Tsevat; Jason G Umans; Jacqueline Attia; Heather L Baker; Joan D Nagel; Colleen A McMullen; Erica Rosemond Journal: J Clin Transl Sci Date: 2021-12-28
Authors: Scott McIntosh; Tye Johnson; Andrew F Wall; Alexander V Prokhorov; Karen Sue Calabro; Duncan Ververs; Vanessa Assibey-Mensah; Deborah J Ossip Journal: JMIR Res Protoc Date: 2017-05-08
Authors: Linda B Cottler; Alan I Green; Harold Alan Pincus; Scott McIntosh; Jennifer L Humensky; Kathleen Brady Journal: J Clin Transl Sci Date: 2019-11-25
Authors: Fátima Sancheznieto; Christine A Sorkness; Jacqueline Attia; Kathryn Buettner; David Edelman; Stuart Hobbs; Scott McIntosh; Linda M McManus; Kathryn Sandberg; H William Schnaper; Linda Scholl; Jason G Umans; Karen Weavers; Anthony Windebank; Wayne T McCormack Journal: J Clin Transl Sci Date: 2021-12-27