BACKGROUND: Interventions have been designed to reduce the prevalence of smoking in college/university students. This review presents a summary and synthesis of the interventions published in English from 1980 to the present. METHODS: Seven databases were searched for relevant published articles, and reference lists were examined for additional published studies. The studies were categorized as (1) individual approaches, such as on-campus cessation programs, and (2) institutional approaches, such as smoke-free policies. The studies were categorized by type of institution and geographic location, study design, sample demographics, and outcomes. RESULTS: Fourteen studies were identified; only five received a "satisfactory" rating based on evaluation criteria. Most studies were based on convenience samples, and were conducted in 4-year institutions. Seven studies used comparison groups, and three were multi-institutional. Individual approaches included educational group sessions and/or individual counseling that were conducted on campus mostly by healthcare personnel. None used nicotine replacement or other medications for cessation. The quit rates for both smokeless tobacco and cigarette users varied, depending on definitions and duration of follow-up contact. Institutional interventions focused mainly on campus smoking restrictions, smoke-free policies, antitobacco messages, and cigarette pricing. Results indicated that interventions can have a positive influence on student behavior, specifically by reducing tobacco use (i.e., prevalence of cigarette smoking and use of smokeless products, amount smoked) among college students, and increasing acceptability of smoking policies and campus restrictions among both tobacco users and nonusers. CONCLUSIONS: While some promising results have been noted, rigorous evaluations of a wider range of programs are needed, along with studies that address cultural and ethnic diversity on campuses.
BACKGROUND: Interventions have been designed to reduce the prevalence of smoking in college/university students. This review presents a summary and synthesis of the interventions published in English from 1980 to the present. METHODS: Seven databases were searched for relevant published articles, and reference lists were examined for additional published studies. The studies were categorized as (1) individual approaches, such as on-campus cessation programs, and (2) institutional approaches, such as smoke-free policies. The studies were categorized by type of institution and geographic location, study design, sample demographics, and outcomes. RESULTS: Fourteen studies were identified; only five received a "satisfactory" rating based on evaluation criteria. Most studies were based on convenience samples, and were conducted in 4-year institutions. Seven studies used comparison groups, and three were multi-institutional. Individual approaches included educational group sessions and/or individual counseling that were conducted on campus mostly by healthcare personnel. None used nicotine replacement or other medications for cessation. The quit rates for both smokeless tobacco and cigarette users varied, depending on definitions and duration of follow-up contact. Institutional interventions focused mainly on campus smoking restrictions, smoke-free policies, antitobacco messages, and cigarette pricing. Results indicated that interventions can have a positive influence on student behavior, specifically by reducing tobacco use (i.e., prevalence of cigarette smoking and use of smokeless products, amount smoked) among college students, and increasing acceptability of smoking policies and campus restrictions among both tobacco users and nonusers. CONCLUSIONS: While some promising results have been noted, rigorous evaluations of a wider range of programs are needed, along with studies that address cultural and ethnic diversity on campuses.
Authors: Beti Thompson; Gloria D Coronado; Lu Chen; L Anne Thompson; Jennifer C Hymer; Amber K Peterson Journal: Public Health Rep Date: 2006 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 2.792
Authors: Leif I Solberg; Stephen E Asche; Raymond Boyle; Maribet C McCarty; Merry Jo Thoele Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2007-06-28 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Alexander V Prokhorov; Tracey Yost; Mary Mullin-Jones; Carl de Moor; Kentya H Ford; Salma Marani; Briseis A Kilfoy; Joshua P Hein; Karen Suchanek Hudmon; Karen M Emmons Journal: Addict Behav Date: 2007-12-27 Impact factor: 3.913
Authors: Eric J Nehl; Chris M Blanchard; Chao-Ying J Peng; Ryan E Rhodes; Janet Kupperman; Phillip B Sparling; Kerry Courneya; Frank Baker Journal: Behav Med Date: 2009 Impact factor: 3.104
Authors: Tracy O'L Tevyaw; Suzanne M Colby; Jennifer W Tidey; Christopher W Kahler; Damaris J Rohsenow; Nancy P Barnett; Chad J Gwaltney; Peter M Monti Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2009-05-14 Impact factor: 4.244