Edison F Paiva1, James H Paxton2, Brian J O'Neil3. 1. Department of Internal Medicine, University of São Paulo School of Medicine, Pacaembu, São Paulo, State of São Paulo 01246-000, Brazil. 2. Department of Emergency Medicine, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI 48201, USA. Electronic address: james.paxton@wayne.edu. 3. Department of Emergency Medicine, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI 48201, USA.
Abstract
AIMS: To identify whether any level of end-tidal carbon dioxide (ETCO2) measured during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) correlates with return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) or survival in adults experiencing cardiac arrest in any setting. METHODS: Systematic review. We included randomized controlled trials, cohort studies, and case-control studies of adult cardiac arrest in any setting that reported specific (rather than pooled) ETCO2 values and attempted to correlate those values with prognosis. Full-text articles were searched on EmBASE, MEDLINE, and Cochrane Database. The Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) guidelines were followed, assigning levels of quality to all evidence used in the meta-analysis. RESULTS: Seventeen observational studies, describing a total of 6198 patients, were included in the qualitative synthesis, and five studies were included in the meta-analysis. The available studies provided consistent but low-quality evidence that ETCO2 measurements ≥10mmHg, obtained at various time points during CPR, are substantially related to ROSC. Additional cut-off values were also found. Initial ETCO2 or 20-min ETCO2>20mmHg appears to be a better predictor of ROSC than the 10mmHg cut off value. A ETCO2<10mmHg after 20min of CPR is associated with a 0.5% likelihood of ROSC. CONCLUSIONS: Based upon existing evidence, ETCO2 levels do seem to provide limited prognostic information for patients who have experienced cardiac arrest. Given the many potential confounders that can influence initial ETCO2 levels, extreme or trending values may be more useful than static mid-range levels. Additional well-designed studies are needed to define optimal timing for the measurement of ETCO2 for prognostic purposes.
AIMS: To identify whether any level of end-tidal carbon dioxide (ETCO2) measured during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) correlates with return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) or survival in adults experiencing cardiac arrest in any setting. METHODS: Systematic review. We included randomized controlled trials, cohort studies, and case-control studies of adult cardiac arrest in any setting that reported specific (rather than pooled) ETCO2 values and attempted to correlate those values with prognosis. Full-text articles were searched on EmBASE, MEDLINE, and Cochrane Database. The Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) guidelines were followed, assigning levels of quality to all evidence used in the meta-analysis. RESULTS: Seventeen observational studies, describing a total of 6198 patients, were included in the qualitative synthesis, and five studies were included in the meta-analysis. The available studies provided consistent but low-quality evidence that ETCO2 measurements ≥10mmHg, obtained at various time points during CPR, are substantially related to ROSC. Additional cut-off values were also found. Initial ETCO2 or 20-min ETCO2>20mmHg appears to be a better predictor of ROSC than the 10mmHg cut off value. A ETCO2<10mmHg after 20min of CPR is associated with a 0.5% likelihood of ROSC. CONCLUSIONS: Based upon existing evidence, ETCO2 levels do seem to provide limited prognostic information for patients who have experienced cardiac arrest. Given the many potential confounders that can influence initial ETCO2 levels, extreme or trending values may be more useful than static mid-range levels. Additional well-designed studies are needed to define optimal timing for the measurement of ETCO2 for prognostic purposes.
Authors: Lars W Andersen; Mathias J Holmberg; Katherine M Berg; Michael W Donnino; Asger Granfeldt Journal: JAMA Date: 2019-03-26 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Robert A Berg; Ron W Reeder; Kathleen L Meert; Andrew R Yates; John T Berger; Christopher J Newth; Joseph A Carcillo; Patrick S McQuillen; Rick E Harrison; Frank W Moler; Murray M Pollack; Todd C Carpenter; Daniel A Notterman; Richard Holubkov; J Michael Dean; Vinay M Nadkarni; Robert M Sutton Journal: Resuscitation Date: 2018-08-15 Impact factor: 5.262
Authors: S Güney Pınar; M Pekdemir; I U Özturan; N Ö Doğan; E Yaka; S Yılmaz; A Karadaş; D Ferek Emir Journal: Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed Date: 2020-10-25 Impact factor: 0.840
Authors: Jose Julio Gutiérrez; Mikel Leturiondo; Sofía Ruiz de Gauna; Jesus María Ruiz; Izaskun Azcarate; Digna María González-Otero; Juan Francisco Urtusagasti; James Knox Russell; Mohamud Ramzan Daya Journal: PLoS One Date: 2021-05-18 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Jasmeet Soar; Bernd W Böttiger; Pierre Carli; Keith Couper; Charles D Deakin; Therese Djärv; Carsten Lott; Theresa Olasveengen; Peter Paal; Tommaso Pellis; Gavin D Perkins; Claudio Sandroni; Jerry P Nolan Journal: Notf Rett Med Date: 2021-06-08 Impact factor: 0.826
Authors: Jasmeet Soar; Katherine M Berg; Lars W Andersen; Bernd W Böttiger; Sofia Cacciola; Clifton W Callaway; Keith Couper; Tobias Cronberg; Sonia D'Arrigo; Charles D Deakin; Michael W Donnino; Ian R Drennan; Asger Granfeldt; Cornelia W E Hoedemaekers; Mathias J Holmberg; Cindy H Hsu; Marlijn Kamps; Szymon Musiol; Kevin J Nation; Robert W Neumar; Tonia Nicholson; Brian J O'Neil; Quentin Otto; Edison Ferreira de Paiva; Michael J A Parr; Joshua C Reynolds; Claudio Sandroni; Barnaby R Scholefield; Markus B Skrifvars; Tzong-Luen Wang; Wolfgang A Wetsch; Joyce Yeung; Peter T Morley; Laurie J Morrison; Michelle Welsford; Mary Fran Hazinski; Jerry P Nolan Journal: Resuscitation Date: 2020-10-21 Impact factor: 5.262
Authors: Mathieu Groulx; Alexandra Nadeau; Marcel Émond; Jessica Harrisson; Pierre-Gilles Blanchard; Douglas Eramian; Eric Mercier Journal: SAGE Open Med Date: 2021-06-30