| Literature DB >> 29216901 |
Konstantinos Mitropoulos1, Eleni Merkouri Papadima2, Georgia Xiromerisiou3, Angeliki Balasopoulou2, Kyriaki Charalampidou2, Vasiliki Galani2, Krystallia-Vassiliki Zafeiri2, Efthymios Dardiotis3, Styliani Ralli3, Georgia Deretzi4, Anne John5, Kyriaki Kydonopoulou6, Elpida Papadopoulou6, Alba di Pardo7, Fulya Akcimen8, Annalisa Loizedda9,10, Valerija Dobričić11, Ivana Novaković11,12, Vladimir S Kostić11, Clint Mizzi2, Brock A Peters13,14, Nazli Basak8, Sandro Orrù9, Evangelos Kiskinis7, David N Cooper15, Spyridon Gerou6, Radoje Drmanac13, Marina Bartsakoulia2, Evangelia-Eirini Tsermpini2, Georgios M Hadjigeorgiou3, Bassam R Ali5, Theodora Katsila2, George P Patrinos16,17.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a devastating disease whose complex pathology has been associated with a strong genetic component in the context of both familial and sporadic disease. Herein, we adopted a next-generation sequencing approach to Greek patients suffering from sporadic ALS (together with their healthy counterparts) in order to explore further the genetic basis of sporadic ALS (sALS).Entities:
Keywords: FTO gene; Founder population; Genomic variants; Sporadic amyotrophic lateral sclerosis; Whole-genome sequencing
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29216901 PMCID: PMC5721583 DOI: 10.1186/s40246-017-0126-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Hum Genomics ISSN: 1473-9542 Impact factor: 4.639
Fig. 1Our three-step strategy towards data reliability. Our three-step strategy involved three patient cohorts: (i) whole-genome sequencing analysis in sALS Greek patients (n = 6) and their healthy counterparts (n = 5), (ii) SNP genotyping (selected variants of interest) in sALS Greek patients (n = 28) and their healthy counterparts (n = 50), and (iii) SNP genotyping (selected variants of interest) in sALS patients of Greek (n = 114), Sardinian (n = 114), and Turkish (n = 148) origin and their healthy counterparts (n = 39, 87, 74, respectively). The first patient cohort served as the discovery dataset, while the second and third patient cohorts were the training datasets
Selected FTO and TBC1D1 gene variants of prime interest
| Gene | SNPs | Alleles | MAF-all | MAF-EUR | Variant type |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| rs2892469 | C>T | 0.31 (T) | 0.49 (T) | Intronic |
| rs1861869 | C>G | 0.38 (G) | 0.54 (G) | ||
| rs17217144 | C>T | 0.31 (T) | 0.49 (T) | ||
| rs7186521 | A>G | 0.37 (G) | 0.49 (G) | ||
|
| rs6850200 | C>A | 0.41 (A) | 0.37 (A) |
Genotyping data of sALS patients and their healthy counterparts
| Population groups | Genotype frequency (%) | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||
| CC | TT | CT |
| CC | GG | CG |
| CC | TT | CT |
| AA | GG | AG |
| AA | CC | CA |
| ||
| Second patient cohort | Greek healthy individuals | 26 | 36 | 38 | 0.005 | 21 | 41 | 38 | 0.003 | 0 | 0 | 100 | PA = 1.55e−12 PB = 7.78e−13 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 1.0 | 18 | 45 | 38 | 0.017 |
| Greek sALS patients | 17 | 22 | 61 | 17 | 22 | 61 | 22 | 13 | 65 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 9 | 35 | 57 | ||||||
| Third patient cohort | Greek healthy individuals | 26 | 36 | 38 | 0.033 | 21 | 41 | 38 | PA = 0.072 | 6 | 2 | 92 | 0.002 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 5.13e | 14 | 43 | 43 | 0.723 |
| Greek sALS patients | 21 | 23 | 56 | 17 | 29 | 54 | 22 | 2 | 76 | 18 | 65 | 18 | 11 | 42 | 48 | ||||||
| Sardinian healthy individuals | 38 | 25 | 38 | 0.63 | 36 | 31 | 33 | 0.61 | 24 | 36 | 40 | 0.67 | 35 | 22 | 42 | 0.64 | 20 | 41 | 39 | 0.53 | |
| Sardinian sALS patients | 31 | 28 | 41 | 29 | 34 | 37 | 27 | 30 | 43 | 29 | 25 | 46 | 15 | 39 | 46 | ||||||
| Turkish healthy individuals | 26 | 26 | 49 | 0.62 | 0 | 100 | 0 | 0.49 | 26 | 26 | 49 | 0.62 | 26 | 26 | 49 | 0.09 | 18 | 45 | 38 | 0.57 | |
| Turkish sALS patients | 24 | 21 | 55 | 0 | 99 | 1 | 26 | 20 | 54 | 21 | 26 | 53 | 13 | 44 | 43 | ||||||
Gene clustering per metabolic or disease network using Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA) to assist decision-making
| Disease or metabolic network | Genes |
|
|---|---|---|
| Neural cell proliferation | ISL1, FTO, ADCYAP1, ΟΤΡ, SPP1 | 6.02 × 10–5 |
| Motor neuron proliferation | ISL1, FTO | 9.53 × 10–5 |
| Motor neuron dysfunction | ISL1, WNT4 | 1.28 × 10–3 |
| Development of neuromuscular junction | PDZRN3 | 1.65 × 10–3 |
| Branching of sensory neurons | PRKG1 | 1.65 × 10–3 |
| ALS | FUS | 1.65 × 10–3 |
| Development of P and M cells of visual nervous system | ΟΤΡ | 1.65 × 10–3 |
| Growth of cerebellar cortex, regulation of upper cervical ganglia | ADCYAP1 | 1.65 × 10–3 |
| Cranial nerve development | ISL1, ERBB4 | 1.9 × 10–3 |
| Brain development | ADCYAP1, ERBB4, FTO, ΟΤΡ, PRKG1 | 2.56 × 10–3 |
| Development of specific nerves of the hand, area of dendritic trees | ISL1 | 3.3 × 10–3 |
| Movement of the cranial neural crest, participation in the formation of the central nervous system, astrocyte attachment | ERBB4 | 3.3 × 10–3 |
| Neural cell number | ADCYAP1, ERBB4, WNT4, SPP1 | 3.75 × 10–3 |
| Nervous system morphology | ERBB4, FTO, WNT4, SPP1, YES1, ISL1 | 6.33 × 10–3 |
| Oligodendrocyte development, excitatory synapse formation | ERBB4 | 6.6 × 10–3 |
| Central nervous system development, dendritic cell development | ERBB4, ADCYAP1 | 7.4 × 10–3 |
| Motor neuron sprouting | FTO | 9.88 × 10–3 |
| v3 spinal cord motor neuron sprouting | FTO | 9.88 × 10–3 |
| Midbrain size | FTO | 9.88 × 10–3 |
| Neuronal withdrawal | WNT4 | 1.32 × 10–2 |
| Brain morphology | ERBB4, FTO, SPP1, YES1 | 1.35 × 10–2 |
| Neuronal branching | ERBB4, ADCYAP1, PRKG1 | 1.58 × 10–2 |
| DNA repair | APTX, FTO, FUS | 1.65 × 10–2 |
Fig. 2Linkage disequilibrium and haplotype block analysis for FTO rs2892469, rs1861869, rs17217144, and rs7186521. Data suggest a haplotype for the FTO genomic variants studied herein. SNAP analysis refers to HapMap datasets, while the HaploView v4.2 analysis corresponds to our Greek cohort. The HaploView 4.2 color scheme denotes the following: white (D′ < 1, LOD < 2) and red (D′ = 1, LOD ≥ 2). rs2892469 and rs1861869 are in perfect LD (D′ = 1, LOD = 23.66, r 2 = 0.884); rs17217144 and rs7186521 exhibit a strong LD (D′ = 0.882, LOD = 10.1, r 2 = 0.738). Block1 is based on confidence intervals, i.e., it was created through 95% of informative comparisons being in “strong LD”
Fig. 3a, b FTO and TBC1D1 expression levels in a range of various human cell types. FTO and TBC1D1 mRNA levels were determined using human-specific primers in various cell types; fibroblasts, embryonic stem cells (ESCs), astrocytes, neural PAX6+ progenitors, stem cell-derived purified motor neurons at three different stages of development (Hb9:GFP on days 0, 16, and 30), and stem cell-derived cortical neurons (NKX21 on days 45 and 50). Human brain and spinal cord RNA served as controls. Normalized RT-qPCR data are expressed as averaged sample replicates. Error bars represent standard deviations