Literature DB >> 29216406

High-Throughput H295R Steroidogenesis Assay: Utility as an Alternative and a Statistical Approach to Characterize Effects on Steroidogenesis.

Derik E Haggard1,2, Agnes L Karmaus1,2, Matthew T Martin2, Richard S Judson2, R Woodrow Setzer2, Katie Paul Friedman2.   

Abstract

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Endocrine Disruptor Screening Program and the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) have used the human adrenocarcinoma (H295R) cell-based assay to predict chemical perturbation of androgen and estrogen production. Recently, a high-throughput H295R (HT-H295R) assay was developed as part of the ToxCast program that includes measurement of 11 hormones, including progestagens, corticosteroids, androgens, and estrogens. To date, 2012 chemicals have been screened at 1 concentration; of these, 656 chemicals have been screened in concentration-response. The objectives of this work were to: (1) develop an integrated analysis of chemical-mediated effects on steroidogenesis in the HT-H295R assay and (2) evaluate whether the HT-H295R assay predicts estrogen and androgen production specifically via comparison with the OECD-validated H295R assay. To support application of HT-H295R assay data to weight-of-evidence and prioritization tasks, a single numeric value based on Mahalanobis distances was computed for 654 chemicals to indicate the magnitude of effects on the synthesis of 11 hormones. The maximum mean Mahalanobis distance (maxmMd) values were high for strong modulators (prochloraz, mifepristone) and lower for moderate modulators (atrazine, molinate). Twenty-five of 28 reference chemicals used for OECD validation were screened in the HT-H295R assay, and produced qualitatively similar results, with accuracies of 0.90/0.75 and 0.81/0.91 for increased/decreased testosterone and estradiol production, respectively. The HT-H295R assay provides robust information regarding estrogen and androgen production, as well as additional hormones. The maxmMd from this integrated analysis may provide a data-driven approach to prioritizing lists of chemicals for putative effects on steroidogenesis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29216406     DOI: 10.1093/toxsci/kfx274

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Toxicol Sci        ISSN: 1096-0929            Impact factor:   4.849


  11 in total

Review 1.  Progress in data interoperability to support computational toxicology and chemical safety evaluation.

Authors:  Sean Watford; Stephen Edwards; Michelle Angrish; Richard S Judson; Katie Paul Friedman
Journal:  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol       Date:  2019-08-09       Impact factor: 4.219

2.  Response to "Comment on 'Application of an in Vitro Assay to Identify Chemicals That Increase Estradiol and Progesterone Synthesis and Are Potential Breast Cancer Risk Factors'".

Authors:  Ruthann A Rudel; Bethsaida Cardona; Alexandre Borrel; Jennifer E Kay
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2022-05-04       Impact factor: 11.035

3.  The Alginate Immobilization of Metabolic Enzymes Platform Retrofits an Estrogen Receptor Transactivation Assay With Metabolic Competence.

Authors:  Chad Deisenroth; Danica E DeGroot; Todd Zurlinden; Andrew Eicher; James McCord; Mi-Young Lee; Paul Carmichael; Russell S Thomas
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2020-12-01       Impact factor: 4.849

4.  Comparison of Approaches for Determining Bioactivity Hits from High-Dimensional Profiling Data.

Authors:  Johanna Nyffeler; Derik E Haggard; Clinton Willis; R Woodrow Setzer; Richard Judson; Katie Paul-Friedman; Logan J Everett; Joshua A Harrill
Journal:  SLAS Discov       Date:  2020-08-29       Impact factor: 3.341

5.  Gestational exposure to an epidemiologically defined mixture of phthalates leads to gonadal dysfunction in mouse offspring of both sexes.

Authors:  Anastasia Repouskou; Emily Panagiotidou; Lydia Panagopoulou; Pernilla Larsdotter Bisting; Astrud R Tuck; Marcus O D Sjödin; Johan Lindberg; Evangelos Bozas; Joëlle Rüegg; Chris Gennings; Carl-Gustaf Bornehag; Pauliina Damdimopoulou; Antonios Stamatakis; Efthymia Kitraki
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-04-23       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Evaluating Chemicals for Thyroid Disruption: Opportunities and Challenges with in Vitro Testing and Adverse Outcome Pathway Approaches.

Authors:  Pamela D Noyes; Katie Paul Friedman; Patience Browne; Jonathan T Haselman; Mary E Gilbert; Michael W Hornung; Stan Barone; Kevin M Crofton; Susan C Laws; Tammy E Stoker; Steven O Simmons; Joseph E Tietge; Sigmund J Degitz
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2019-09-05       Impact factor: 9.031

7.  Comment on "Application of an in Vitro Assay to Identify Chemicals That Increase Estradiol and Progesterone Synthesis and Are Potential Breast Cancer Risk Factors".

Authors:  Lyle D Burgoon; Christopher J Borgert
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2022-05-04       Impact factor: 11.035

8.  Development of a prioritization method for chemical-mediated effects on steroidogenesis using an integrated statistical analysis of high-throughput H295R data.

Authors:  Derik E Haggard; R Woodrow Setzer; Richard S Judson; Katie Paul Friedman
Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol       Date:  2019-10-29       Impact factor: 3.271

9.  Application of an in Vitro Assay to Identify Chemicals That Increase Estradiol and Progesterone Synthesis and Are Potential Breast Cancer Risk Factors.

Authors:  Bethsaida Cardona; Ruthann A Rudel
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2021-07-21       Impact factor: 9.031

10.  Invited Perspective: Prioritizing Chemical Testing and Evaluation Using Validated in Vitro Assays Relevant to Key Characteristics.

Authors:  Kathryn Z Guyton; Mary K Schubauer-Berigan
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2021-07-21       Impact factor: 9.031

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.